» Articles » PMID: 34693400

Attitudes Toward Risk Among Emergency Physicians and Advanced Practice Clinicians in Massachusetts

Overview
Publisher Elsevier
Specialty Emergency Medicine
Date 2021 Oct 25
PMID 34693400
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: Risk aversion is a personality trait influential to decision making in medicine. Little is known about how emergency department (ED) clinicians differ in their attitudes toward risk taking.

Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional survey of practicing ED clinicians (physicians and advanced practice clinicians [APCs]) in Massachusetts using the following 4 existing validated scales: the Risk-Taking Scale (RTS), Stress from Uncertainty Scale (SUS), the Fear of Malpractice Scale (FMS), and the Need for (Cognitive) Closure Scale (NCC). We used Cronbach's α to assess the reliability of each scale and performed multivariable linear regressions to analyze the association between the score for each scale and clinician characteristics.

Results: Of 1458 ED clinicians recruited for participation, 1116 (76.5%) responded from 93% of acute care hospitals in Massachusetts. Each of the 4 scales demonstrated high internal consistency reliability with Cronbach's αs ranging from 0.76 to 0.92. The 4 scales also were moderately correlated with one another (0.08 to 0.54; all  < 0.05). The multivariable results demonstrated differences between physicians and APCs, with physicians showing a greater tolerance for risk or uncertainty (NCC difference, -3.58 [95% confidence interval, CI, -5.26 to -1.90]; SUS difference, -3.14 [95% CI: -4.99 to -1.29]) and a higher concern about malpractice (FMS difference, 1.14 [95% CI, 0.11-2.17]). Differences were also observed based on clinician age (a proxy for years of experience), with greater age associated with greater tolerance of risk or uncertainty (age older than 50 years compared with age 35 years and younger; NCC difference, -2.84 [95% CI, -4.69 to -1.00]; SUS difference, -4.71 [95% CI, -6,74 to -2.68]) and less concern about malpractice (FMS difference, -3.19 [95% CI, -4.31 to -2.06]). There were no appreciable differences based on sex, and there were no consistent associations between scale scores and the practice and payment characteristics assessed.

Conclusion: We found that risk attitudes of ED clinicians were associated with type of training (physician vs APC) and age (experience). These differences suggest one possible explanation for the observed differences in decision making.

Citing Articles

Self-assessment and learning motivation in emergency point-of-care ultrasound: an online pilot investigation in German physicians.

Bansbach J, Bentele M, Bollinger M, Bentele S, Langenhan R, Gerber B BMC Emerg Med. 2024; 24(1):235.

PMID: 39695953 PMC: 11656859. DOI: 10.1186/s12873-024-01154-z.


Exploring communication preferences and risk thresholds of clinicians and parents of febrile infants under 90 days presenting to the emergency department: a qualitative study.

Wilson K, Umana E, McCleary D, Waterfield T, Woolfall K Arch Dis Child. 2024; 109(11):886-893.

PMID: 38986575 PMC: 11503189. DOI: 10.1136/archdischild-2023-326727.


Clinician Risk Tolerance and Rates of Admission From the Emergency Department.

Smulowitz P, Burke R, Ostrovsky D, Novack V, Isbell L, Kan V JAMA Netw Open. 2024; 7(2):e2356189.

PMID: 38363570 PMC: 10873771. DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.56189.


Perspectives of Emergency Clinicians About Medical Errors Resulting in Patient Harm or Malpractice Litigation.

Ostrovsky D, Novack V, Smulowitz P, Burke R, Landon B, Isbell L JAMA Netw Open. 2022; 5(11):e2241461.

PMID: 36355376 PMC: 9650607. DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.41461.


Attitudes toward risk among emergency physicians and advanced practice clinicians in Massachusetts.

Smulowitz P, Burke R, Ostrovsky D, Novack V, Isbell L, Landon B J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open. 2021; 2(5):e12573.

PMID: 34693400 PMC: 8514146. DOI: 10.1002/emp2.12573.

References
1.
Simpkin A, Khan A, West D, Garcia B, Sectish T, Spector N . Stress From Uncertainty and Resilience Among Depressed and Burned Out Residents: A Cross-Sectional Study. Acad Pediatr. 2018; 18(6):698-704. DOI: 10.1016/j.acap.2018.03.002. View

2.
Saposnik G, Redelmeier D, Ruff C, Tobler P . Cognitive biases associated with medical decisions: a systematic review. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2016; 16(1):138. PMC: 5093937. DOI: 10.1186/s12911-016-0377-1. View

3.
Saposnik G, Sempere A, Prefasi D, Selchen D, Ruff C, Maurino J . Decision-making in Multiple Sclerosis: The Role of Aversion to Ambiguity for Therapeutic Inertia among Neurologists (DIScUTIR MS). Front Neurol. 2017; 8:65. PMC: 5331032. DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2017.00065. View

4.
Lawton R, Robinson O, Harrison R, Mason S, Conner M, Wilson B . Are more experienced clinicians better able to tolerate uncertainty and manage risks? A vignette study of doctors in three NHS emergency departments in England. BMJ Qual Saf. 2019; 28(5):382-388. PMC: 6560462. DOI: 10.1136/bmjqs-2018-008390. View

5.
Wu F, Darracq M . Physician assistant utilization in U.S. emergency departments; 2010 to 2017. Am J Emerg Med. 2020; 42:132-136. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2020.02.009. View