» Articles » PMID: 34671633

Can Cultured Meat Be an Alternative to Farm Animal Production for a Sustainable and Healthier Lifestyle?

Overview
Journal Front Nutr
Date 2021 Oct 21
PMID 34671633
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Producing animal proteins requires large areas of agricultural land and is a major source of greenhouse gases. Cellular agriculture, especially cultured meat, could be a potential alternative for the environment and human health. It enables meat and other agricultural products to be grown from cells in a bioreactor without being taken from farm animals. This paper aims at an interdisciplinary review of literature focusing on potential benefits and risks associated with cultured meat. To achieve this goal, several international databases and governmental projects were thoroughly analyzed using keywords and phrases with specialty terms. This is a growing scientific domain, which has generated a series of debates regarding its potential effects. On the one hand the potential of beneficial effects is the reduction of agricultural land usage, pollution and the improvement of human health. Other authors question if cultured meat could be a sustainable alternative for reducing gas emissions. Interestingly, the energy used for cultured meat could be higher, due to the replacement of some biological functions, by technological processes. For potential effects to turn into results, a realistic understanding of the technology involved and more experimental studies are required.

Citing Articles

Environmental Impact of Meat Protein Substitutes: A Mini-Review.

Lee D, Mariano Jr E, Choi Y, Park J, Han D, Kim J Food Sci Anim Resour. 2025; 45(1):62-80.

PMID: 39840250 PMC: 11743834. DOI: 10.5851/kosfa.2024.e109.


Cell-Based Meat Safety and Regulatory Approaches: A Comprehensive Review.

Bakhsh A, Kim B, Ishamri I, Choi S, Li X, Li Q Food Sci Anim Resour. 2025; 45(1):145-164.

PMID: 39840246 PMC: 11743846. DOI: 10.5851/kosfa.2024.e122.


Exploring Sustainable Future Protein Sources.

Oh Y, Kim H Food Sci Anim Resour. 2025; 45(1):81-108.

PMID: 39840240 PMC: 11743843. DOI: 10.5851/kosfa.2024.e111.


Derivation and Characterization of Novel Cytocompatible Decellularized Tissue Scaffold for Myoblast Growth and Differentiation.

Singh A, Singh S, Kumar V, Gupta J, Kumar M, Sarma D Cells. 2024; 13(1).

PMID: 38201245 PMC: 10778107. DOI: 10.3390/cells13010041.


An Overview of Recent Progress in Engineering Three-Dimensional Scaffolds for Cultured Meat Production.

Wang Y, Zou L, Liu W, Chen X Foods. 2023; 12(13).

PMID: 37444351 PMC: 10340413. DOI: 10.3390/foods12132614.


References
1.
Grossi G, Goglio P, Vitali A, Williams A . Livestock and climate change: impact of livestock on climate and mitigation strategies. Anim Front. 2020; 9(1):69-76. PMC: 7015462. DOI: 10.1093/af/vfy034. View

2.
Hocquette J . Is in vitro meat the solution for the future?. Meat Sci. 2016; 120:167-176. DOI: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2016.04.036. View

3.
Lynch J, Pierrehumbert R . Climate impacts of cultured meat and beef cattle. Front Sustain Food Syst. 2019; 3. PMC: 6751088. DOI: 10.3389/fsufs.2019.00005. View

4.
Cantas L, Shah S, Cavaco L, Manaia C, Walsh F, Popowska M . A brief multi-disciplinary review on antimicrobial resistance in medicine and its linkage to the global environmental microbiota. Front Microbiol. 2013; 4:96. PMC: 3653125. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2013.00096. View

5.
Holy C, Shoichet M, Davies J . Engineering three-dimensional bone tissue in vitro using biodegradable scaffolds: investigating initial cell-seeding density and culture period. J Biomed Mater Res. 2000; 51(3):376-82. DOI: 10.1002/1097-4636(20000905)51:3<376::aid-jbm11>3.0.co;2-g. View