» Articles » PMID: 34669696

Understanding Degraded Speech Leads to Perceptual Gating of a Brainstem Reflex in Human Listeners

Overview
Journal PLoS Biol
Specialty Biology
Date 2021 Oct 20
PMID 34669696
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The ability to navigate "cocktail party" situations by focusing on sounds of interest over irrelevant, background sounds is often considered in terms of cortical mechanisms. However, subcortical circuits such as the pathway underlying the medial olivocochlear (MOC) reflex modulate the activity of the inner ear itself, supporting the extraction of salient features from auditory scene prior to any cortical processing. To understand the contribution of auditory subcortical nuclei and the cochlea in complex listening tasks, we made physiological recordings along the auditory pathway while listeners engaged in detecting non(sense) words in lists of words. Both naturally spoken and intrinsically noisy, vocoded speech-filtering that mimics processing by a cochlear implant (CI)-significantly activated the MOC reflex, but this was not the case for speech in background noise, which more engaged midbrain and cortical resources. A model of the initial stages of auditory processing reproduced specific effects of each form of speech degradation, providing a rationale for goal-directed gating of the MOC reflex based on enhancing the representation of the energy envelope of the acoustic waveform. Our data reveal the coexistence of 2 strategies in the auditory system that may facilitate speech understanding in situations where the signal is either intrinsically degraded or masked by extrinsic acoustic energy. Whereas intrinsically degraded streams recruit the MOC reflex to improve representation of speech cues peripherally, extrinsically masked streams rely more on higher auditory centres to denoise signals.

Citing Articles

Noises on-How the Brain Deals with Acoustic Noise.

de Hoz L, McAlpine D Biology (Basel). 2024; 13(7).

PMID: 39056695 PMC: 11274191. DOI: 10.3390/biology13070501.


Intracranial electrophysiology of spectrally degraded speech in the human cortex.

Nourski K, Steinschneider M, Rhone A, Berger J, Dappen E, Kawasaki H Front Hum Neurosci. 2024; 17:1334742.

PMID: 38318272 PMC: 10839784. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2023.1334742.


Auditory brainstem mechanisms likely compensate for self-imposed peripheral inhibition.

Boothalingam S, Peterson A, Powell L, Easwar V Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):12693.

PMID: 37542191 PMC: 10403563. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-39850-8.


Auditory Deprivation during Development Alters Efferent Neural Feedback and Perception.

Mishra S, Moore D J Neurosci. 2023; 43(25):4642-4649.

PMID: 37221095 PMC: 10286938. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2182-22.2023.


Brainstem auditory physiology in children with listening difficulties.

Hunter L, Blankenship C, Shinn-Cunningham B, Hood L, Motlagh Zadeh L, Moore D Hear Res. 2023; 429:108705.

PMID: 36709582 PMC: 10152893. DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2023.108705.


References
1.
Hukin R, Darwin C . Comparison of the effect of onset asynchrony on auditory grouping in pitch matching and vowel identification. Percept Psychophys. 1995; 57(2):191-6. DOI: 10.3758/bf03206505. View

2.
Pichora-Fuller M, Kramer S, Eckert M, Edwards B, Hornsby B, Humes L . Hearing Impairment and Cognitive Energy: The Framework for Understanding Effortful Listening (FUEL). Ear Hear. 2016; 37 Suppl 1:5S-27S. DOI: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000312. View

3.
Winslow R, Sachs M . Effect of electrical stimulation of the crossed olivocochlear bundle on auditory nerve response to tones in noise. J Neurophysiol. 1987; 57(4):1002-21. DOI: 10.1152/jn.1987.57.4.1002. View

4.
Feeney M, Grant I, Marryott L . Wideband energy reflectance measurements in adults with middle-ear disorders. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2003; 46(4):901-11. DOI: 10.1044/1092-4388(2003/070). View

5.
Broadway J, Franklin M, Schooler J . Early event-related brain potentials and hemispheric asymmetries reveal mind-wandering while reading and predict comprehension. Biol Psychol. 2015; 107:31-43. DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2015.02.009. View