» Articles » PMID: 34668630

Reconciling Validity and Challenges of Patient Comfort and Understanding: Guidelines to Patient-oriented Questionnaires

Abstract

Background: Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are widely recognized as important tools for achieving a patient-centred approach in health research. While PROMs are subject to several stages of validation during development, even questionnaires with robust psychometric properties may challenge patient comfort and understanding.

Aim: Building on the experience of patient engagement in the PriCARE research programme, this paper outlines the team's response to concerns raised by patient partners regarding the administration of the questionnaire.

Methods: Based on a participatory action research design and the patient engagement framework in the Strategy for Patient-Oriented Research of the Canadian Institutes of Health Research, PriCARE team members worked together to discuss concerns, review the questionnaires and come up with solutions. Data were collected through participant observation of team meetings.

Results: This paper demonstrates how patient partners were engaged in PriCARE and integrated into the programme's governance structure, focusing on the challenges that they raised regarding the questionnaires and how these were addressed by PriCARE team members in a six-step approach: (1) Recognizing patient partner concerns, discussing concerns and reframing the challenges; (2) Detailing and sharing evidence of the validity of the questionnaires; (3) Evaluating potential solutions; (4) Searching the literature for guidelines; (5) Creating guidelines; and (6) Sharing and refining guidelines.

Conclusion: This six-step approach demonstrates how research teams can integrate patient partners as equal members, develop meaningful collaboration through recognition of individual experiences and expertise and ensure that the patient perspective is taken into consideration in research and healthcare innovation.

Patient Or Public Contribution: All patient partners from the PriCARE programme were actively involved in the six-step approach. They were also involved in the preparation of the manuscript.

Citing Articles

A Systematic Review of Research on Guided Access Cavity Preparation Endodontic Treatment: Dentin Preservation Perspectives.

Muryani A, Aripin D, Dharsono H, Rajion Z, Wicaksono S Clin Cosmet Investig Dent. 2025; 17:49-63.

PMID: 39872903 PMC: 11771166. DOI: 10.2147/CCIDE.S491632.


Case management in primary healthcare for people with complex needs to improve integrated care: a large-scale implementation study protocol.

Hudon C, Chouinard M, Doucet S, Piccinini-Vallis H, Fairman K, Sampalli T BMJ Open. 2024; 14(8):e083783.

PMID: 39134438 PMC: 11331999. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-083783.


The CONECT-6 case-finding tool to identify patients with complex needs: A few tips to promote understanding.

Angrignon-Girouard E, Schwarz C, Howse D, Aubrey K, Bisson M, Chouinard M J Eval Clin Pract. 2024; 31(1):e14129.

PMID: 39129340 PMC: 11771697. DOI: 10.1111/jep.14129.


Disrupting patterns of exclusion in participatory spaces: Involving people from vulnerable populations.

MacFarlane A, LeMaster J Health Expect. 2022; 25(5):2031-2033.

PMID: 35983897 PMC: 9615074. DOI: 10.1111/hex.13578.


Patient and researcher experiences of patient engagement in primary care health care research: A participatory qualitative study.

Beland S, Lambert M, Delahunty-Pike A, Howse D, Schwarz C, Chouinard M Health Expect. 2022; 25(5):2365-2376.

PMID: 35593113 PMC: 9615076. DOI: 10.1111/hex.13542.


References
1.
Stewart A, Thrasher A, Goldberg J, Shea J . A framework for understanding modifications to measures for diverse populations. J Aging Health. 2012; 24(6):992-1017. PMC: 3768261. DOI: 10.1177/0898264312440321. View

2.
Greenhalgh J . The applications of PROs in clinical practice: what are they, do they work, and why?. Qual Life Res. 2008; 18(1):115-23. DOI: 10.1007/s11136-008-9430-6. View

3.
Juniper E . Validated questionnaires should not be modified. Eur Respir J. 2009; 34(5):1015-7. DOI: 10.1183/09031936.00110209. View

4.
Paterson C . Seeking the patient's perspective: a qualitative assessment of EuroQol, COOP-WONCA charts and MYMOP. Qual Life Res. 2004; 13(5):871-81. DOI: 10.1023/B:QURE.0000025586.51955.78. View

5.
Peeters G, Barker A, Talevski J, Ackerman I, Ayton D, Reid C . Do patients have a say? A narrative review of the development of patient-reported outcome measures used in elective procedures for coronary revascularisation. Qual Life Res. 2018; 27(5):1369-1380. DOI: 10.1007/s11136-018-1795-6. View