» Articles » PMID: 34660765

Investigating the Efficacy of a Canine Rabies Vaccine Following Storage Outside of the Cold-Chain in a Passive Cooling Device

Overview
Journal Front Vet Sci
Date 2021 Oct 18
PMID 34660765
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Thermostable vaccines greatly improved the reach and impact of large-scale programmes to eliminate infectious diseases such as smallpox, polio, and rinderpest. A study from 2015 demonstrated that the potency of the Nobivac Rabies vaccine was not impacted following experimental storage at 30°C for 3 months. Whether the vaccine would remain efficacious following storage under more natural, fluctuating temperature conditions remains unknown. We carried out a randomised controlled non-inferiority trial to compare serological responses in dogs following vaccination with doses stored under cold chain conditions with those stored within a locally made Passive Cooling Device ("Zeepot") under fluctuating temperature conditions. Nobivac Rabies vaccine was stored under either cold-chain conditions or within the Zeepot for 2 months. Daily ambient temperatures and temperatures within the Zeepot were recorded every 3 h. Following storage, 412 domestic dogs were randomly assigned to receive either cold-chain or Zeepot stored Nobivac Rabies vaccine. Baseline and day 28-post vaccination blood samples were collected. Serological analysis using the Fluorescent Antibody Virus Neutralisation assay was carried out with a threshold of 0.5 IU/ml to determine seroconversion. In addition, the impact of dog Body Condition Score, sex, and age on seroconversion was examined. The serological response of dogs vaccinated using Nobivac Rabies vaccine stored within the Zeepot was not inferior to the response of dogs vaccinated using cold-chain stored vaccine (z = 1.1, df = 313, -value = 0.25). Indeed, the 28-day post-vaccination group geometric mean titre was 1.8 and 2.0 IU/ml for cold-chain vs. non-cold-chain storage, respectively. Moreover, the percentage of dogs that seroconverted in each arm was almost identical (85%). There was a positive linear trend between Body Condition Score (O.R. 2.2, 95% CI: 1.1-5.1) and seroconversion, suggesting dogs of poor condition may not respond as expected to vaccination. Our study demonstrated the potency of Nobivac Rabies vaccine is not impacted following storage under elevated fluctuating temperatures within a Zeepot. These results have potentially exciting applications for scaling up mass dog vaccination programmes in low-and-middle income countries, particularly for hard-to-reach populations with limited access to power and cold-chain vaccine storage.

Citing Articles

Infection and Prevention of Rabies Viruses.

Chen S, Rai C, Wang S, Chen Y Microorganisms. 2025; 13(2).

PMID: 40005749 PMC: 11858514. DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms13020380.


Evaluation of an iELISA for detection and quantification of rabies antibodies in domestic dog sera.

Lugelo A, Hampson K, McElhinney L, Lankester F Vaccine. 2023; 41(44):6565-6571.

PMID: 37716829 PMC: 11717753. DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2023.09.004.


Evaluation of the immune response of dogs after a mass vaccination campaign against rabies in Tunisia.

Handous M, Turki I, Ghram A, BenMaiz S, Bensalem J, Basdouri N BMC Vet Res. 2023; 19(1):24.

PMID: 36717812 PMC: 9885660. DOI: 10.1186/s12917-023-03582-8.


Immune Response After Rabies Vaccination in Owned Free-Roaming Domestic Dogs in Flores Island, Indonesia.

Wera E, Warembourg C, Bulu P, Siko M, Durr S Front Vet Sci. 2022; 9:868380.

PMID: 35754536 PMC: 9218352. DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2022.868380.


Risks related to a possible reduction of the waiting period for dogs after rabies antibody titration to 30 days compared with 90 days of the current EU legislative regime.

Alvarez J, Nielsen S, Robardet E, Stegeman A, Van Gucht S, Vuta V EFSA J. 2022; 20(6):e07350.

PMID: 35662806 PMC: 9161159. DOI: 10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7350.

References
1.
Mariner J, House J, Mebus C, Sollod A, Chibeu D, Jones B . Rinderpest eradication: appropriate technology and social innovations. Science. 2012; 337(6100):1309-12. DOI: 10.1126/science.1223805. View

2.
Berndtsson L, Nyman A, Rivera E, Klingeborn B . Factors associated with the success of rabies vaccination of dogs in Sweden. Acta Vet Scand. 2011; 53:22. PMC: 3071328. DOI: 10.1186/1751-0147-53-22. View

3.
Cliquet F, Aubert M, Sagne L . Development of a fluorescent antibody virus neutralisation test (FAVN test) for the quantitation of rabies-neutralising antibody. J Immunol Methods. 1998; 212(1):79-87. DOI: 10.1016/s0022-1759(97)00212-3. View

4.
Davoust B, Normand T, Bourry O, Dang H, Leroy E, Bourdoiseau G . Epidemiological survey on gastro-intestinal and blood-borne helminths of dogs in north-east Gabon. Onderstepoort J Vet Res. 2009; 75(4):359-64. DOI: 10.4102/ojvr.v75i4.112. View

5.
Zipursky S, Djingarey M, Lodjo J, Olodo L, Tiendrebeogo S, Ronveaux O . Benefits of using vaccines out of the cold chain: delivering meningitis A vaccine in a controlled temperature chain during the mass immunization campaign in Benin. Vaccine. 2014; 32(13):1431-5. PMC: 5355207. DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2014.01.038. View