» Articles » PMID: 34657617

Extended Parallel Process Model (EPPM) in Evaluating Lung Cancer Risk Perception Among Older Smokers

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Public Health
Date 2021 Oct 18
PMID 34657617
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: There is a lack of scientific literature on the application of fear appeals theories to evaluate lung cancer risk perception among smokers. The aim of the present study is to apply the Extended Parallel Process Model (EPPM) to discover the perception of the smokers about their lifetime risk of developing lung cancer (perceived susceptibility), their perception of lung cancer survival (perceived severity), response efficacy, self-efficacy, and readiness to quit.

Methods: In this cross-sectional study, 215 eligible smokers (aged 45 years and over who have smoked at least 1 pack per day in the last 5 years) were recruited. The data collection tool was designed using validate self-report questionnaires and it was contained items on the perceived risk of a smoker contracting lung cancer and perceived lung cancer survival rate. It also had questions to measure the main constructs of the EPPM and Readiness to quit ("Low_Readiness", and "High_Readiness"). To test how the data support conceptual EPPM to data, Generalized Structural Equation Modeling (GSEM) was used.

Results: Findings showed a significant relationship between Perceived_Susceptibility and Perceived_Response Efficacy; (B = 1.16, P < 0.001); between Perceived_Susceptibility and Perceived_Self Efficacy, (B = -0.93, P < 0.001), Perceived_Severity, and Perceived_Response Efficacy (B = 1.07, P < 0.001). There was also a significant relationship between Perceived_Threat and Perceived_Response Efficacy; between Perceived_Threat and Perceived_Self Efficacy. The relationship between High_Readiness and Perceived_Self Efficacy, and between High_Readiness and Perceived_Severity also were significant. However, the relationships between High_Readiness and Perceived_Threat were not significant (P > 0.05).

Conclusion: Perceived_threat and Perceived_efficacy were important for smokers with low readiness to quit, while Perceived_efficacy was most important for smokers with high readiness to quit. These findings could be used in promoting lung cancer awareness and designing smoking cessation programs based on smokers' stages of change.

Citing Articles

Smoking Avoidance, Physical Activity and Diet as Preventative Behaviours for Lung, Prostate and Colorectal Cancer - A Comparison of the Extended Parallel Process Model Groups.

Domoslawska-Zylinska K, Wlodarczyk D Int J Public Health. 2025; 70:1607278.

PMID: 39968234 PMC: 11832310. DOI: 10.3389/ijph.2025.1607278.


Cigarette smoking and perceived risk of cardiovascular disease in Iran.

Zarghami F, Rajabi A, Abed-Tazehabadi R, Charkazi A, Shahryari A BMC Public Health. 2025; 25(1):198.

PMID: 39833765 PMC: 11744808. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-025-21444-w.


Unrealistic risk perceptions of Iranian current cigarette smokers on developing lung cancer and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD): a cross-sectional study.

Zarghami F, Rajabi A, Abed-Tazehabadi R, Charkazi A, Shahryari A Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):25667.

PMID: 39463424 PMC: 11514160. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-77323-8.


Determining the perceived risk of lung cancer and chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases (COPD) among hookah users in Iran.

Rajabi A, Cheperli A, Shahryari A, Charkazi A, Zarghami F BMC Pulm Med. 2024; 24(1):493.

PMID: 39379886 PMC: 11462696. DOI: 10.1186/s12890-024-03310-4.


Boil water notices as health-risk communication: risk perceptions, efficacy, and compliance during winter storm Uri.

Day A, OShay S, Islam K, Seeger M, Sperone F, McElmurry S Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):850.

PMID: 38191773 PMC: 10774435. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-50286-y.


References
1.
Chen L, Yang X . Using EPPM to Evaluate the Effectiveness of Fear Appeal Messages Across Different Media Outlets to Increase the Intention of Breast Self-Examination Among Chinese Women. Health Commun. 2018; 34(11):1369-1376. DOI: 10.1080/10410236.2018.1493416. View

2.
Ghasemian A, Rezaei N, Moghaddam S, Mansouri A, Parsaeian M, Delavari A . Tobacco Smoking Status and the Contribution to Burden of Diseases in Iran, 1990-2010: findings from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Arch Iran Med. 2015; 18(8):493-501. DOI: 015188/AIM.006. View

3.
Fotuhi O, Fong G, Zanna M, Borland R, Yong H, Cummings K . Patterns of cognitive dissonance-reducing beliefs among smokers: a longitudinal analysis from the International Tobacco Control (ITC) Four Country Survey. Tob Control. 2012; 22(1):52-8. PMC: 4009366. DOI: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050139. View

4.
Termeh Zonouzy V, Niknami S, Ghofranipour F, Montazeri A . An educational intervention based on the extended parallel process model to improve attitude, behavioral intention, and early breast cancer diagnosis: a randomized trial. Int J Womens Health. 2018; 11:1-10. PMC: 6302829. DOI: 10.2147/IJWH.S182146. View

5.
Alberg A, Nonemaker J . Who is at high risk for lung cancer? Population-level and individual-level perspectives. Semin Respir Crit Care Med. 2008; 29(3):223-32. PMC: 3399915. DOI: 10.1055/s-2008-1076742. View