» Articles » PMID: 34640449

Using Deep Neural Networks for Predicting Age and Sex in Healthy Adult Chest Radiographs

Overview
Journal J Clin Med
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2021 Oct 13
PMID 34640449
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The performance of chest radiography-based age and sex prediction has not been well validated. We used a deep learning model to predict the age and sex of healthy adults based on chest radiographs (CXRs).

Methods: In this retrospective study, 66,643 CXRs of 47,060 healthy adults were used for model training and testing. In total, 47,060 individuals (mean age ± standard deviation, 38.7 ± 11.9 years; 22,144 males) were included. By using chronological ages as references, mean absolute error (MAE), root mean square error (RMSE), and Pearson's correlation coefficient were used to assess the model performance. Summarized class activation maps were used to highlight the activated anatomical regions. The area under the curve (AUC) was used to examine the validity for sex prediction.

Results: When model predictions were compared with the chronological ages, the MAE was 2.1 years, RMSE was 2.8 years, and Pearson's correlation coefficient was 0.97 ( < 0.001). Cervical, thoracic spines, first ribs, aortic arch, heart, rib cage, and soft tissue of thorax and flank seemed to be the most crucial activated regions in the age prediction model. The sex prediction model demonstrated an AUC of >0.99.

Conclusion: Deep learning can accurately estimate age and sex based on CXRs.

Citing Articles

Patient Reidentification from Chest Radiographs: An Interpretable Deep Metric Learning Approach and Its Applications.

Macpherson M, Hutchinson C, Horst C, Goh V, Montana G Radiol Artif Intell. 2023; 5(6):e230019.

PMID: 38074779 PMC: 10698609. DOI: 10.1148/ryai.230019.


Overcoming the Challenges in the Development and Implementation of Artificial Intelligence in Radiology: A Comprehensive Review of Solutions Beyond Supervised Learning.

Hong G, Jang M, Kyung S, Cho K, Jeong J, Lee G Korean J Radiol. 2023; 24(11):1061-1080.

PMID: 37724586 PMC: 10613849. DOI: 10.3348/kjr.2023.0393.


Deep learning-based age estimation from chest CT scans.

Azarfar G, Ko S, Adams S, Babyn P Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2023; 19(1):119-127.

PMID: 37418109 DOI: 10.1007/s11548-023-02989-w.


An Artificial Neural Network for Nasogastric Tube Position Decision Support.

Drozdov I, Dixon R, Szubert B, Dunn J, Green D, Hall N Radiol Artif Intell. 2023; 5(2):e220165.

PMID: 37035435 PMC: 10077078. DOI: 10.1148/ryai.220165.


Pediatric age estimation from thoracic and abdominal CT scout views using deep learning.

Demircioglu A, Nassenstein K, Umutlu L Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):2274.

PMID: 36755075 PMC: 9907877. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-29296-3.


References
1.
Franke K, Gaser C, Manor B, Novak V . Advanced BrainAGE in older adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Front Aging Neurosci. 2014; 5:90. PMC: 3865444. DOI: 10.3389/fnagi.2013.00090. View

2.
Barchilon V, Hershkovitz I, Rothschild B, Wish-Baratz S, Latimer B, Jellema L . Factors affecting the rate and pattern of the first costal cartilage ossification. Am J Forensic Med Pathol. 1996; 17(3):239-47. DOI: 10.1097/00000433-199609000-00012. View

3.
Jylhava J, Pedersen N, Hagg S . Biological Age Predictors. EBioMedicine. 2017; 21:29-36. PMC: 5514388. DOI: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2017.03.046. View

4.
MCCORMICK W . Mineralization of the costal cartilages as an indicator of age: preliminary observations. J Forensic Sci. 1980; 25(4):736-41. View

5.
Thodberg H, Kreiborg S, Juul A, Damgaard Pedersen K . The BoneXpert method for automated determination of skeletal maturity. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2009; 28(1):52-66. DOI: 10.1109/TMI.2008.926067. View