Applying Mixed-Effects Modeling to Behavioral Economic Demand: An Introduction

Overview

Journal Perspect Behav Sci

Publisher Springer Nature

Specialty Psychiatry

Date 2021 Oct 11

PMID 34632281

Citations 16

Authors

Brent A Kaplan

Christopher T Franck

Kevin McKee

Shawn P Gilroy

Mikhail N Koffarnus

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40614-021-00299-7.

Citing Articles

Examining Demand and Substitutability of Usual Brand Little Cigars/Cigarillos and Cigarettes in Young Adults Who Dual Use.

Mead-Morse E, Cassidy R, Kpormegbey D, Moore T, Oncken C, Tidey J Nicotine Tob Res. 2024; 26(8):1057-1065.

PMID: 38365185 PMC: 11519020. DOI: 10.1093/ntr/ntae025.

E-cigarette Price Impacts legal and Black-Market Cigarette Purchasing Under a Hypothetical Reduced-Nicotine Cigarette Standard.

Dolan S, Bradley M, Johnson M Nicotine Tob Res. 2023; 25(9):1556-1564.

PMID: 37195268 PMC: 10439485. DOI: 10.1093/ntr/ntad067.

Cannabis demand and use among veterans: A prospective examination.

Aston E, Meshesha L, Stevens A, Borsari B, Metrik J Psychol Addict Behav. 2023; 37(8):985-995.

PMID: 37079805 PMC: 10587363. DOI: 10.1037/adb0000916.

A Comprehensive Systematic Review of Procedures and Analyses Used in Basic and Preclinical Studies of Resurgence, 1970-2020.

Podlesnik C, Ritchey C, Waits J, Gilroy S Perspect Behav Sci. 2023; 46(1):137-184.

PMID: 37006602 PMC: 10050505. DOI: 10.1007/s40614-022-00361-y.

The Blinded-Dose Purchase Task: assessing hypothetical demand based on cocaine, methamphetamine, and alcohol administration.

Berry M, Naude G, Johnson P, Johnson M Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2023; 240(4):921-933.

PMID: 36869212 PMC: 10006272. DOI: 10.1007/s00213-023-06334-6.

References

Kaplan B, Koffarnus M, Franck C, Bickel W . Effects of Reduced-Nicotine Cigarettes Across Regulatory Environments in the Experimental Tobacco Marketplace: A Randomized Trial. Nicotine Tob Res. 2020; 23(7):1123-1132. PMC: 8186426. DOI: 10.1093/ntr/ntaa226. View

Strickland J, Campbell E, Lile J, Stoops W . Utilizing the commodity purchase task to evaluate behavioral economic demand for illicit substances: a review and meta-analysis. Addiction. 2019; 115(3):393-406. DOI: 10.1111/add.14792. View

Bentzley B, Fender K, Aston-Jones G . The behavioral economics of drug self-administration: a review and new analytical approach for within-session procedures. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2012; 226(1):113-25. PMC: 3572328. DOI: 10.1007/s00213-012-2899-2. View

Young M . Discounting: A practical guide to multilevel analysis of indifference data. J Exp Anal Behav. 2017; 108(1):97-112. DOI: 10.1002/jeab.265. View

Kaplan B, Reed D . Happy hour drink specials in the Alcohol Purchase Task. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2018; 26(2):156-167. DOI: 10.1037/pha0000174. View

Powell G, Beckmann J, Marusich J, Gipson C . Nicotine reduction does not alter essential value of nicotine or reduce cue-induced reinstatement of nicotine seeking. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2020; 212:108020. PMC: 7293915. DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2020.108020. View

Gilroy S, Kaplan B, Reed D, Hantula D, Hursh S . An exact solution for unit elasticity in the exponential model of operant demand. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2019; 27(6):588-597. DOI: 10.1037/pha0000268. View

DeHart W, Kaplan B . Applying mixed-effects modeling to single-subject designs: An introduction. J Exp Anal Behav. 2019; 111(2):192-206. DOI: 10.1002/jeab.507. View

Gonzalez-Roz A, Jackson J, Murphy C, Rohsenow D, MacKillop J . Behavioral economic tobacco demand in relation to cigarette consumption and nicotine dependence: a meta-analysis of cross-sectional relationships. Addiction. 2019; 114(11):1926-1940. PMC: 7837316. DOI: 10.1111/add.14736. View

10.

Fragale J, Beck K, Pang K . Use of the Exponential and Exponentiated Demand Equations to Assess the Behavioral Economics of Negative Reinforcement. Front Neurosci. 2017; 11:77. PMC: 5318419. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2017.00077. View

11.

Gilroy S, Kaplan B . Furthering Open Science in Behavior Analysis: An Introduction and Tutorial for Using GitHub in Research. Perspect Behav Sci. 2020; 42(3):565-581. PMC: 6768926. DOI: 10.1007/s40614-019-00202-5. View

12.

Gilroy S, Kaplan B . Modeling Treatment-Related Decision-Making Using Applied Behavioral Economics: Caregiver Perspectives in Temporally-Extended Behavioral Treatments. J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2020; 48(5):607-618. DOI: 10.1007/s10802-020-00619-6. View

13.

Hursh S, Silberberg A . Economic demand and essential value. Psychol Rev. 2008; 115(1):186-98. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295X.115.1.186. View

14.

Bickel W, Moody L, Higgins S . Some current dimensions of the behavioral economics of health-related behavior change. Prev Med. 2016; 92:16-23. PMC: 5085840. DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2016.06.002. View

15.

Strickland J, Lacy R . Behavioral economic demand as a unifying language for addiction science: Promoting collaboration and integration of animal and human models. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2020; 28(4):404-416. PMC: 7390687. DOI: 10.1037/pha0000358. View

16.

Hursh S, Roma P . Behavioral economics and empirical public policy. J Exp Anal Behav. 2013; 99(1):98-124. DOI: 10.1002/jeab.7. View

17.

Meza C, Jaffrezic F, Foulley J . REML estimation of variance parameters in nonlinear mixed effects models using the SAEM algorithm. Biom J. 2007; 49(6):876-88. DOI: 10.1002/bimj.200610348. View

18.

Liao W, Luo X, Le C, Chu H, Epstein L, Yu J . Analysis of cigarette purchase task instrument data with a left-censored mixed effects model. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2013; 21(2):124-32. PMC: 4636201. DOI: 10.1037/a0031610. View

19.

Stein J, Koffarnus M, Snider S, Quisenberry A, Bickel W . Identification and management of nonsystematic purchase task data: Toward best practice. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2015; 23(5):377-86. PMC: 4579007. DOI: 10.1037/pha0000020. View

20.

Kaplan B, Foster R, Reed D, Amlung M, Murphy J, MacKillop J . Understanding alcohol motivation using the alcohol purchase task: A methodological systematic review. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2018; 191:117-140. DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2018.06.029. View