» Articles » PMID: 35045071

Behavioral Economic Methods to Inform Infectious Disease Response: Prevention, Testing, and Vaccination in the COVID-19 Pandemic

Abstract

The role of human behavior to thwart transmission of infectious diseases like COVID-19 is evident. Psychological and behavioral science are key areas to understand decision-making processes underlying engagement in preventive health behaviors. Here we adapt well validated methods from behavioral economic discounting and demand frameworks to evaluate variables (e.g., delay, cost, probability) known to impact health behavior engagement. We examine the contribution of these mechanisms within a broader response class of behaviors reflecting adherence to public health recommendations made during the COVID-19 pandemic. Four crowdsourced samples (total N = 1,366) completed individual experiments probing a response class including social (physical) distancing, facemask wearing, COVID-19 testing, and COVID-19 vaccination. We also measure the extent to which choice architecture manipulations (e.g., framing, opt-in/opt-out) may promote (or discourage) behavior engagement. We find that people are more likely to socially distance when specified activities are framed as high risk, that facemask use during social interaction decreases systematically with greater social relationship, that describing delay until testing (rather than delay until results) increases testing likelihood, and that framing vaccine safety in a positive valence improves vaccine acceptance. These findings collectively emphasize the flexibility of methods from diverse areas of behavioral science for informing public health crisis management.

Citing Articles

COVID-19 Testing Behavior as a Predictor of COVID-19 Vaccination in Southeastern Louisiana: A Longitudinal Cohort Study.

Al-Dahir S, Barri S, Heyer K, Taylor A, Khalil A, Belkhouche M Vaccines (Basel). 2025; 12(12).

PMID: 39772000 PMC: 11679823. DOI: 10.3390/vaccines12121338.


Temporal distribution of schedule-induced behavior depends on the essential value of the reinforcer.

Martinez-Herrada A, Pellon R, Lopez-Tolsa G J Exp Anal Behav. 2025; 123(1):10-29.

PMID: 39760436 PMC: 11757002. DOI: 10.1002/jeab.4235.


COVID-19 vaccine refusal is driven by deliberate ignorance and cognitive distortions.

Fulawka K, Hertwig R, Pachur T NPJ Vaccines. 2024; 9(1):167.

PMID: 39271718 PMC: 11399437. DOI: 10.1038/s41541-024-00951-8.


Hyperbolic discounting and exponentiated demand: Modeling demand for cigarettes in three dimensions.

Rzeszutek M, Kaplan B, Traxler H, Franck C, Koffarnus M J Exp Anal Behav. 2022; 119(1):169-191.

PMID: 36562640 PMC: 9872831. DOI: 10.1002/jeab.818.


Probability Discounting in College Students' Willingness to Isolate During COVID-19: Implications for Behavior Analysis and Public Health.

Belisle J, Paliliunas D, Sickman E, Janota T, Lauer T Psychol Rec. 2022; 72(4):713-725.

PMID: 36092128 PMC: 9444125. DOI: 10.1007/s40732-022-00527-9.


References
1.
Peer E, Vosgerau J, Acquisti A . Reputation as a sufficient condition for data quality on Amazon Mechanical Turk. Behav Res Methods. 2013; 46(4):1023-31. DOI: 10.3758/s13428-013-0434-y. View

2.
Kaplan B, Reed D . Happy hour drink specials in the Alcohol Purchase Task. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2018; 26(2):156-167. DOI: 10.1037/pha0000174. View

3.
Zhang R, Li Y, Zhang A, Wang Y, Molina M . Identifying airborne transmission as the dominant route for the spread of COVID-19. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020; 117(26):14857-14863. PMC: 7334447. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2009637117. View

4.
Lawyer S, Schoepflin F . Predicting domain-specific outcomes using delay and probability discounting for sexual versus monetary outcomes. Behav Processes. 2013; 96:71-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.beproc.2013.03.001. View

5.
Amlung M, MacKillop J . Further evidence of close correspondence for alcohol demand decision making for hypothetical and incentivized rewards. Behav Processes. 2015; 113:187-91. PMC: 4362679. DOI: 10.1016/j.beproc.2015.02.012. View