» Articles » PMID: 34631787

Feasibility and Short-Term Outcomes of One-Step and Two-Step Sleeve Gastrectomy As Revision Procedures for Failed Adjustable Gastric Banding Compared With Those After Primary Sleeve Gastrectomy

Overview
Journal Front Surg
Specialty General Surgery
Date 2021 Oct 11
PMID 34631787
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The practice of bariatric surgery was studied using the German Bariatric Surgery Registry (GBSR). The focus of the study was to evaluate whether revision surgery One-Step (OS) or Two-Step (TS) sleeve gastrectomy (SG) has a large benefit in terms of perioperative risk in patients after failed Adjustable Gastric Banding (AGB). The data collection includes patients who underwent One-Step SG (OS-SG) or Two-Step SG (TS-SG) as revision surgery after AGB and primary SG (P-SG) between 2005 and 2019. Outcome criteria were perioperative complications, comorbidities, 30-day mortality, and operating time. The study analyzed data from 27,346 patients after P-SG, 320 after OS-SG, and 168 after TS-SG. Regarding the intraoperative complication, there was a significant difference in favor of P-SG and TS-SG compared to OS-SG ( < 0.001). The incidence of pulmonary complications was significantly higher in the OS-SG ( < 0.001). There was also a significant difference in occurrence of staple line stenosis in favor of TS-SG ( = 0.005) and the occurrence of sepsis ( = 0.008). The mean operating time was statistically longer in the TS-SG group than in the OS-SG group ( < 0.001). The 30-day mortality was not significantly different between the three groups ( = 0.727). In general, our study shows that converting a gastric band to a SG is safe and feasible. However, lower complications were obtained with TS-SG compared to OS-SG. Despite acceptable complication and mortality rates of both procedures, we cannot recommend any surgical method as a standard procedure. Proper patient selection is crucial to avoid possible adverse effects.

Citing Articles

Challenges of Revisional Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery: A Comprehensive Guide to Unraveling the Complexities and Solutions of Revisional Bariatric Procedures.

Evans L, Castillo-Larios R, Cornejo J, Elli E J Clin Med. 2024; 13(11).

PMID: 38892813 PMC: 11172990. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13113104.

References
1.
Falk V, Sheppard C, Kanji A, Birch D, Karmali S, de Gara C . The fate of laparoscopic adjustable gastric band removal. Can J Surg. 2019; 62(5):328-333. PMC: 7006354. DOI: 10.1503/cjs.001918. View

2.
Stroh C, Benedix D, Weiner R, Benedix F, Wolff S, Knoll C . Is a one-step sleeve gastrectomy indicated as a revision procedure after gastric banding? Data analysis from a quality assurance study of the surgical treatment of obesity in Germany. Obes Surg. 2013; 24(1):9-14. DOI: 10.1007/s11695-013-1068-y. View

3.
OBrien P, McPhail T, Chaston T, Dixon J . Systematic review of medium-term weight loss after bariatric operations. Obes Surg. 2006; 16(8):1032-40. DOI: 10.1381/096089206778026316. View

4.
Pardela M, Wiewiora M, Sitkiewicz T, Wylezol M . The progress in bariatric surgery. J Physiol Pharmacol. 2005; 56 Suppl 6:35-44. View

5.
Flynn M, McNeil D, Maloff B, Mutasingwa D, Wu M, Ford C . Reducing obesity and related chronic disease risk in children and youth: a synthesis of evidence with 'best practice' recommendations. Obes Rev. 2005; 7 Suppl 1:7-66. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-789X.2006.00242.x. View