» Articles » PMID: 25443075

Revisional Surgery After Failed Gastric Banding: Results of One-stage Conversion to RYGB in 195 Patients

Overview
Publisher Elsevier
Specialty Endocrinology
Date 2014 Dec 3
PMID 25443075
Citations 19
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The most performed restrictive bariatric procedure is the laparoscopic adjustable gastric band (LAGB). With many patients still receiving a LAGB in Europe and the United States, inevitably, the number of complications also increases. For many complications revisional bariatric surgery is necessary. In this study, the outcomes of one-stage LAGB conversion to a Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) at our institution are presented. The objective of this study was to investigate the safety and efficiency of RYGB performed as a one-stage procedure after failed LAGB.

Methods: Patients were retrospectively selected using a prospectively collected database. The gastric band had to be in situ for at least 1 year and minimum postoperative follow-up was 12 months. The revisional RYGB had to be performed as a 1-step procedure.

Results: A total of 195 patients were included while 3 were lost to follow up. Overall, 178 (91%) procedures were performed without perioperative complications, and only 8 (4%) patients required reoperation within 30 days. The mean follow-up was 40 months (±24) after RYGB. Mean excess weight loss (EWL) increased from 25% (±26/-50- 120%) to 60% (±21.2/0- 130), 65% (±23.5/0- 131), 63% (±24.2/2- 132), 60% (±24.1/0- 111) and 53% (±28.7/-39- 109) in the first 5 postoperative years.

Conclusion: Converting a gastric band to a RYGB in a one-stage procedure is safe and feasible, with acceptable complication rates when performed in a specialized institution. The RYGB conversion results in a good EWL of 65% after 2 years. However, proper patient selection is of the utmost importance.

Citing Articles

Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass as Conversion Procedure of Failed Gastric Banding: Short-Term Outcomes of 1295 Patients in One Single Center.

Handojo K, Ismaeil A, Van Huele A, Van Neste C, Debergh I, Dillemans B Obes Surg. 2023; 33(10):2963-2972.

PMID: 37548925 PMC: 10514178. DOI: 10.1007/s11695-023-06746-5.


One-stage versus two-stage Roux-Y gastric bypass as redo surgery of failed adjustable gastric banding.

Thaher O, Driouch J, Hukauf M, Stroh C Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2022; 105(7):614-622.

PMID: 36250224 PMC: 10471435. DOI: 10.1308/rcsann.2022.0085.


Feasibility and Short-Term Outcomes of One-Step and Two-Step Sleeve Gastrectomy as Revision Procedures for Failed Adjustable Gastric Banding Compared With Those After Primary Sleeve Gastrectomy.

Thaher O, Driouch J, Hukauf M, Kockerling F, Stroh C Front Surg. 2021; 8:752319.

PMID: 34631787 PMC: 8493029. DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2021.752319.


Revisional One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass with a 150-cm Biliopancreatic Limb After Failure of Adjustable Gastric Banding: Mid-Term Outcomes and Comparison Between One- and Two-Stage Approaches.

Petrucciani N, Martini F, Benois M, Kassir R, Boudrie H, VAN Haverbeke O Obes Surg. 2021; 31(12):5330-5341.

PMID: 34609712 PMC: 8595146. DOI: 10.1007/s11695-021-05728-9.


Roux-en-Y gastric bypass versus one anastomosis-mini gastric bypass as a rescue procedure following failed restrictive bariatric surgery. A systematic review of literature with metanalysis.

Velotti N, Vitiello A, Berardi G, Di Lauro K, Musella M Updates Surg. 2021; 73(2):639-647.

PMID: 33606148 DOI: 10.1007/s13304-020-00938-9.