Association of the Cervical Microbiota With Pregnancy Outcome in a Subfertile Population Undergoing Fertilization: A Case-Control Study
Overview
Infectious Diseases
Microbiology
Authors
Affiliations
The microorganisms of the reproductive tract have been implicated to affect fertilization (IVF) outcomes. However, studies on the reproductive tract microbiota of infertile women are limited and the correlation between cervical microbiota and IVF outcome remains elusive. This study aimed to characterize the cervical microbiota of IVF patients undergoing embryo transfer (ET) and assess associations between the cervical microbiota and pregnancy outcomes while exploring the underlying contributing factors. We launched a nested case-control study of 100 patients with two fresh or frozen-thawed cleavage embryos transferred per IVF cycle. Cervical swabs were collected on the day of ET and divided into four groups according to clinical pregnancy outcomes. Variable regions 3 and 4 (V3-V4) of the 16S rRNA gene were amplified and sequenced on the Illumina MiSeq platform. In fresh IVF-ET cycles, the clinical pregnancy group (FP, n = 25) demonstrated higher α diversity ( = 0.0078) than the non-pregnancy group (FN, n = 26). Analysis of similarity (ANOSIM) revealed a significant difference in β diversity between the two groups (R = 0.242, = 0.001). In frozen-thawed ET cycles, though not significant, similar higher α diversity was found in the clinical pregnancy group (TP, n = 27) compared to the non-pregnancy group (TN, n = 22) and ANOSIM analysis showed a significant difference between the two groups (R = 0.062, = 0.045). For patients in fresh IVF-ET groups, , , , , and showed differentially abundance between pregnant and non-pregnant women and they accounted for the largest share of all taxa investigated. Among them, was negatively correlated with the other genera and positively correlated with serum estradiol levels. Logistic regression analysis suggested that the composition of the cervical microbiota on the day of ET was associated with the clinical pregnancy in fresh IVF-ET cycles ( = 0.030). Our results indicate that cervical microbiota composition has an impact on the outcome of assisted reproductive therapy.
Uterine Microbiota and Bisphenols: Novel Influencers in Reproductive Health.
Castellanos-Ruiz D, Ojeda-Borbolla J, Ruiz-Garcia O, Pena-Corona S, Martinez-Pena A, Ibarra-Rubio M J Xenobiot. 2025; 15(1).
PMID: 39997369 PMC: 11856463. DOI: 10.3390/jox15010026.
Davidson I, Nikbakht E, Haupt L, Ashton K, Dunn P J Assist Reprod Genet. 2024; 42(1):15-37.
PMID: 39433639 PMC: 11805751. DOI: 10.1007/s10815-024-03292-6.
Souza S, Monteiro P, Moura G, Santos N, Fontanezi C, de Almeida Gomes I JBRA Assist Reprod. 2023; 27(3):496-506.
PMID: 37417853 PMC: 10712827. DOI: 10.5935/1518-0557.20230006.
Age- and endometrial microbiota-related delay in development of endometrial receptivity.
Fujii S, Oguchi T Reprod Med Biol. 2023; 22(1):e12523.
PMID: 37383030 PMC: 10298046. DOI: 10.1002/rmb2.12523.
Guan W, Dong S, Wang Z, Jiao J, Wang X Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2023; 13:1059339.
PMID: 37305412 PMC: 10250658. DOI: 10.3389/fcimb.2023.1059339.