» Articles » PMID: 34626526

Exposure-safety Analysis of QTc Interval and Transaminase Levels Following Bedaquiline Administration in Patients with Drug-resistant Tuberculosis

Overview
Publisher Wiley
Specialty Pharmacology
Date 2021 Oct 9
PMID 34626526
Citations 14
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Bedaquiline (BDQ) has shown great value in the treatment of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) in recent years. However, exposure-safety relationships must be explored to extend the use of BDQ. Two reported safety findings for BDQ are prolongation of the QTc interval and elevation of transaminase levels. In this study, we investigated the potential relationships between BDQ and/or its main metabolite (M2) pharmacokinetic (PK) metrics and QTcF interval or transaminase levels in patients with MDR-TB using the approved dose regimen. Data from 429 patients with MDR-TB from two phase IIb studies were analyzed via nonlinear mixed-effects modeling. Individual model-predicted concentrations and summary PK metrics were evaluated, respectively, in the QTcF interval and transaminase level exposure-response models. Investigation of further covariate effects was performed in both models. M2 concentrations were found to be responsible for the drug-related QTcF increase in a model accounting for circadian rhythm patterns, time on study, effect of concomitant medication with QT liability, and patient demographics. Simulations with the final model suggested that doses higher than the approved dose (leading to increased M2 concentrations) are not expected to lead to a critical QTcF interval increase. No exposure-safety relationship could be described with transaminase levels despite previous reports of higher levels in patients treated with BDQ. The developed longitudinal models characterized the role of M2 concentrations in QTc interval prolongation and found no concentration dependency for transaminase level elevation, together suggesting that BDQ exposure at the high end of the observed range may not be associated with a higher risk of safety events.

Citing Articles

HIV and body mass index are associated with prolonged corrected QT interval among people with drug-resistant tuberculosis on bedaquiline-containing regimen in Uganda.

Jackson Dumo Lodiong L, Izudi J, Amos T, Twinomugisha B, Kulaba N, Amanee Elias Lumori B IJID Reg. 2024; 13:100438.

PMID: 39403274 PMC: 11472635. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijregi.2024.100438.


The effect of anti-tuberculosis drug pharmacokinetics on QTc prolongation.

Jin Y, Benkeser D, Kipiani M, Maranchick N, Mikiashvili L, Barbakadze K Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2023; 62(4):106939.

PMID: 37517627 PMC: 10538394. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2023.106939.


Population pharmacokinetics and model-based dosing evaluation of bedaquiline in multidrug-resistant tuberculosis patients.

Shao G, Bao Z, Forsman L, Paues J, Werngren J, Niward K Front Pharmacol. 2023; 14:1022090.

PMID: 37050904 PMC: 10083270. DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1022090.


Predictions of Bedaquiline and Pretomanid Target Attainment in Lung Lesions of Tuberculosis Patients using Translational Minimal Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Modeling.

Mehta K, Guo T, van der Graaf P, van Hasselt J Clin Pharmacokinet. 2023; 62(3):519-532.

PMID: 36802057 PMC: 10042768. DOI: 10.1007/s40262-023-01217-7.


Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of anti-tuberculosis drugs: An evaluation of , methodologies and human studies.

Alffenaar J, de Steenwinkel J, Diacon A, Simonsson U, Srivastava S, Wicha S Front Pharmacol. 2022; 13:1063453.

PMID: 36569287 PMC: 9780293. DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2022.1063453.


References
1.
Maartens G, Brill M, Pandie M, Svensson E . Pharmacokinetic interaction between bedaquiline and clofazimine in patients with drug-resistant tuberculosis. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2017; 22(1):26-29. DOI: 10.5588/ijtld.17.0615. View

2.
Svensson E, Dosne A, Karlsson M . Population Pharmacokinetics of Bedaquiline and Metabolite M2 in Patients With Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis: The Effect of Time-Varying Weight and Albumin. CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol. 2016; 5(12):682-691. PMC: 5192973. DOI: 10.1002/psp4.12147. View

3.
Luo S, Michler K, Johnston P, Macfarlane P . A comparison of commonly used QT correction formulae: the effect of heart rate on the QTc of normal ECGs. J Electrocardiol. 2004; 37 Suppl:81-90. DOI: 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2004.08.030. View

4.
Minocha M, Li H, Chiu Y, Carter D, Othman A . Models of Variability and Circadian Rhythm in Heart Rate, Blood Pressure, and QT Interval for Healthy Subjects Who Received Placebo in Phase I Trials. Clin Transl Sci. 2019; 12(5):470-480. PMC: 6742942. DOI: 10.1111/cts.12640. View

5.
Andrsova I, Hnatkova K, Sisakova M, Toman O, Smetana P, Huster K . Influence of heart rate correction formulas on QTc interval stability. Sci Rep. 2021; 11(1):14269. PMC: 8275798. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-93774-9. View