Evaluation of the Clinical Performance of a Magnetic Force-assisted Electrochemical Immunoassay for the Detection of SARS-CoV-2 Antigens
Overview
Affiliations
Rapid antigen (Ag) tests for the detection of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) provide quick results, do not require specialized technical skills or infrastructure, and can be used as a point-of-care method to prevent the spread of coronavirus disease (COVID-19). The performance of a magnetic force-assisted electrochemical immunoassay-based test, namely the MARK-B COVID-19 Ag test (BBB, Sungnam, Republic of Korea), was evaluated using 170 nasopharyngeal swab specimens and compared to that of RT-PCR and commercial rapid Ag test (STANDARD Q COVID-19 Ag Test, SD Biosensor, Suwon-si, Republic of Korea). The overall sensitivity and specificity of the MARK-B test were 90.0% (95% CI 79.4%-96.2%) and 99.0% (95% CI 95.0%-99.9%), respectively, with a kappa coefficient of 0.908. The correlations between the electrical current values of MARK-B and the Ct values of RT-PCR were -0.898 (E gene, 95% CI -0.938 to -0.834) and -0.914 (RdRp gene, 95% CI -0.948 to -0.860), respectively. The limit of detection of the MARK-B was measured using the viral culture reference samples and found to be 1 x 102 pfu/mL. The magnetic force-assisted electrochemical immunoassay-based Ag test can be used to rapidly detect SARS-CoV-2 infections, and the corresponding fully automated portable device can provide easy readability and semi-quantitative results.
Yang Y, Jiesisibieke Z, Tung T Int J Public Health. 2023; 68:1605452.
PMID: 37588042 PMC: 10425602. DOI: 10.3389/ijph.2023.1605452.
Ashagre W, Atnafu A, Wassie L, Tschopp R, Fentahun D, Assefa G PLoS One. 2022; 17(11):e0277779.
PMID: 36413550 PMC: 9681070. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0277779.
Mao S, Fu L, Yin C, Liu X, Karimi-Maleh H RSC Adv. 2022; 12(35):22592-22607.
PMID: 36105989 PMC: 9372877. DOI: 10.1039/d2ra04162f.
Hwang B, Kim E, Kim S, Hwang H Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2022; 9:798079.
PMID: 35071206 PMC: 8767762. DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2021.798079.