» Articles » PMID: 34616237

Look Who's Talking: Teaching and Discourse Practices Across Discipline, Position, Experience, and Class Size in STEM College Classrooms

Overview
Journal Bioscience
Date 2021 Oct 7
PMID 34616237
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Students are more likely to learn in college science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM) classrooms when instructors use teacher discourse moves (TDMs) that encourage student engagement and learning. However, although teaching practices are well studied, TDMs are not well understood in college STEM classrooms. In STEM courses at a minority-serving institution (MSI; n = 74), we used two classroom observation protocols to investigate teaching practices and TDMs across disciplines, instructor types, years of teaching experience, and class size. We found that instructors guide students in active learning activities, but they use authoritative discourse approaches. In addition, chemistry instructors presented more than biology instructors. Also, teaching faculty had relatively high dialogic, interactive discourse, and neither years of faculty teaching experience nor class size had an impact on teaching practices or TDMs. Our results have implications for targeted teaching professional development efforts across instructor and course characteristics to improve STEM education at MSIs.

Citing Articles

An exploration of the relationship between active learning and student motivation in STEM: a mixed methods study.

Stieha V, Earl B, Hagens H, Haynes M, Ulappa A, Bond L Adv Physiol Educ. 2024; 48(3):621-638.

PMID: 38932697 PMC: 11427012. DOI: 10.1152/advan.00247.2022.


"What's Your Thinking behind That?" Exploring Why Biology Instructors Use Classroom Discourse.

Donham C, Andrews T J Microbiol Biol Educ. 2023; 24(2).

PMID: 37614872 PMC: 10443393. DOI: 10.1128/jmbe.00132-22.


The Metamorphosing Professor: Adapting Teaching to Fulfill the Promise of Biology Education.

Garcia-Ojeda M, Nishiguchi M Integr Comp Biol. 2022; 62(6):1519-1527.

PMID: 36175168 PMC: 9801978. DOI: 10.1093/icb/icac149.


Collaborative Teaching plus (CT+): A Timely, Flexible, and Dynamic Course Design Implemented during Emergency Remote Teaching in an Introductory Biology Course.

Dulai K, Kranzfelder P, Signorini A, Pusey T, Valencia A, Urbina C CBE Life Sci Educ. 2022; 21(4):ar61.

PMID: 36112617 PMC: 9727617. DOI: 10.1187/cbe.21-08-0199.


Predicting implementation of active learning by tenure-track teaching faculty using robust cluster analysis.

Denaro K, Kranzfelder P, Owens M, Sato B, Zuckerman A, Hardesty R Int J STEM Educ. 2022; 9(1):49.

PMID: 35915654 PMC: 9334417. DOI: 10.1186/s40594-022-00365-9.

References
1.
Anderson W, Banerjee U, Drennan C, Elgin S, Epstein I, Handelsman J . Science education. Changing the culture of science education at research universities. Science. 2011; 331(6014):152-3. DOI: 10.1126/science.1198280. View

2.
Meaders C, Toth E, Lane A, Shuman J, Couch B, Stains M . "What Will I Experience in My College STEM Courses?" An Investigation of Student Predictions about Instructional Practices in Introductory Courses. CBE Life Sci Educ. 2019; 18(4):ar60. PMC: 8727061. DOI: 10.1187/cbe.19-05-0084. View

3.
Shadle S, Marker A, Earl B . Faculty drivers and barriers: laying the groundwork for undergraduate STEM education reform in academic departments. Int J STEM Educ. 2019; 4(1):8. PMC: 6310369. DOI: 10.1186/s40594-017-0062-7. View

4.
Knight J, Wood W . Teaching more by lecturing less. Cell Biol Educ. 2005; 4(4):298-310. PMC: 1305892. DOI: 10.1187/05-06-0082. View

5.
Denaro K, Sato B, Harlow A, Aebersold A, Verma M . Comparison of Cluster Analysis Methodologies for Characterization of Classroom Observation Protocol for Undergraduate STEM (COPUS) Data. CBE Life Sci Educ. 2021; 20(1):ar3. PMC: 8108488. DOI: 10.1187/cbe.20-04-0077. View