» Articles » PMID: 34610766

Mass Extinctions Alter Extinction and Origination Dynamics with Respect to Body Size

Overview
Journal Proc Biol Sci
Specialty Biology
Date 2021 Oct 6
PMID 34610766
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Whether mass extinctions and their associated recoveries represent an intensification of background extinction and origination dynamics versus a separate macroevolutionary regime remains a central debate in evolutionary biology. The previous focus has been on extinction, but origination dynamics may be equally or more important for long-term evolutionary outcomes. The evolution of animal body size is an ideal process to test for differences in macroevolutionary regimes, as body size is easily determined, comparable across distantly related taxa and scales with organismal traits. Here, we test for shifts in selectivity between background intervals and the 'Big Five' mass extinction events using capture-mark-recapture models. Our body-size data cover 10 203 fossil marine animal genera spanning 10 Linnaean classes with occurrences ranging from Early Ordovician to Late Pleistocene (485-1 Ma). Most classes exhibit differences in both origination and extinction selectivity between background intervals and mass extinctions, with the direction of selectivity varying among classes and overall exhibiting stronger selectivity during origination after mass extinction than extinction during the mass extinction. Thus, not only do mass extinction events shift the marine biosphere into a new macroevolutionary regime, the dynamics of recovery from mass extinction also appear to play an underappreciated role in shaping the biosphere in their aftermath.

Citing Articles

Selectivity of mass extinctions: Patterns, processes, and future directions.

Payne J, Al Aswad J, Deutsch C, Monarrez P, Penn J, Singh P Camb Prism Extinct. 2025; 1:e12.

PMID: 40078672 PMC: 11895734. DOI: 10.1017/ext.2023.10.


Body-size evolution in gastropods across the Plio-Pleistocene extinction in the western Atlantic.

Anderson B, Petsios E, Behn J, Betz A, Allmon W, Lieberman B PLoS One. 2024; 19(12):e0313060.

PMID: 39671366 PMC: 11642969. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0313060.


A new tiny fossil penguin from the Late Oligocene of New Zealand and the morphofunctional transition of the penguin wing.

Ando T, Robinson J, Loch C, Nakahara T, Hayashi S, Richards M J R Soc N Z. 2024; 54(5):660-681.

PMID: 39440294 PMC: 11459834. DOI: 10.1080/03036758.2024.2362283.


Cautionary tales on the use of proxies to estimate body size and form of extinct animals.

Gayford J, Engelman R, Sternes P, Itano W, Bazzi M, Collareta A Ecol Evol. 2024; 14(9):e70218.

PMID: 39224151 PMC: 11368419. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.70218.


High extinction risk in large foraminifera during past and future mass extinctions.

Feng Y, Song H, Song H, Wu Y, Li X, Tian L Sci Adv. 2024; 10(32):eadj8223.

PMID: 39110795 PMC: 11305383. DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.adj8223.


References
1.
Payne J, Bush A, Heim N, Knope M, McCauley D . Ecological selectivity of the emerging mass extinction in the oceans. Science. 2016; 353(6305):1284-6. DOI: 10.1126/science.aaf2416. View

2.
Raup D, Sepkoski Jr J . Mass extinctions in the marine fossil record. Science. 1982; 215(4539):1501-3. DOI: 10.1126/science.215.4539.1501. View

3.
Jablonski D . Background and mass extinctions: the alternation of macroevolutionary regimes. Science. 1986; 231(4734):129-33. DOI: 10.1126/science.231.4734.129. View

4.
Peters S . Environmental determinants of extinction selectivity in the fossil record. Nature. 2008; 454(7204):626-9. DOI: 10.1038/nature07032. View

5.
Payne J, Finnegan S . The effect of geographic range on extinction risk during background and mass extinction. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007; 104(25):10506-11. PMC: 1890565. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0701257104. View