» Articles » PMID: 34607945

Eighteen-month-old Infants Represent Nonlocal Syntactic Dependencies

Overview
Specialty Science
Date 2021 Oct 5
PMID 34607945
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The human ability to produce and understand an indefinite number of sentences is driven by syntax, a cognitive system that can combine a finite number of primitive linguistic elements to build arbitrarily complex expressions. The expressive power of syntax comes in part from its ability to encode potentially unbounded dependencies over abstract structural configurations. How does such a system develop in human minds? We show that 18-mo-old infants are capable of representing abstract nonlocal dependencies, suggesting that a core property of syntax emerges early in development. Our test case is English -questions, in which a fronted -phrase can act as the argument of a verb at a distance (e.g., ). Whereas prior work has focused on infants' interpretations of these questions, we introduce a test to probe their underlying syntactic representations, independent of meaning. We ask when infants know that an object -phrase and a local object of a verb cannot co-occur because they both express the same argument relation (e.g., * ). We find that 1) 18 mo olds demonstrate awareness of this complementary distribution pattern and thus represent the nonlocal grammatical dependency between the -phrase and the verb, but 2) younger infants do not. These results suggest that the second year of life is a period of active syntactic development, during which the computational capacities for representing nonlocal syntactic dependencies become evident.

Citing Articles

Testing AI on language comprehension tasks reveals insensitivity to underlying meaning.

Dentella V, Gunther F, Murphy E, Marcus G, Leivada E Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):28083.

PMID: 39543236 PMC: 11564762. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-79531-8.


The gradual coevolution of syntactic combinatorics and categorization under the effects of human self-domestication: a proposal.

Benitez-Burraco A, Hoshi K, Progovac L Cogn Process. 2023; 24(3):425-439.

PMID: 37306792 PMC: 10359229. DOI: 10.1007/s10339-023-01140-6.


A model for learning strings is not a model of language.

Murphy E, Leivada E Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022; 119(23):e2201651119.

PMID: 35648823 PMC: 9191669. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2201651119.


The newborn brain is sensitive to the communicative function of language.

Forgacs B, Tauzin T, Gergely G, Gervain J Sci Rep. 2022; 12(1):1220.

PMID: 35075193 PMC: 8786876. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-05122-0.


Eighteen-month-old infants represent nonlocal syntactic dependencies.

Perkins L, Lidz J Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021; 118(41).

PMID: 34607945 PMC: 8521675. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2026469118.

References
1.
Maye J, Werker J, Gerken L . Infant sensitivity to distributional information can affect phonetic discrimination. Cognition. 2001; 82(3):B101-11. DOI: 10.1016/s0010-0277(01)00157-3. View

2.
Kouider S, Long B, Le Stanc L, Charron S, Fievet A, Barbosa L . Neural dynamics of prediction and surprise in infants. Nat Commun. 2015; 6:8537. PMC: 4633815. DOI: 10.1038/ncomms9537. View

3.
van Heugten M, Shi R . Infants' sensitivity to non-adjacent dependencies across phonological phrase boundaries. J Acoust Soc Am. 2010; 128(5):EL223-8. DOI: 10.1121/1.3486197. View

4.
Frank M, Braginsky M, Yurovsky D, Marchman V . Wordbank: an open repository for developmental vocabulary data. J Child Lang. 2016; 44(3):677-694. DOI: 10.1017/S0305000916000209. View

5.
Roder B, Bushneil E, Sasseville A . Infants' Preferences for Familiarity and Novelty During the Course of Visual Processing. Infancy. 2020; 1(4):491-507. DOI: 10.1207/S15327078IN0104_9. View