» Articles » PMID: 34605187

Comparison of Polynomial Fitting Versus Single Time Point Analysis of ECIS Data for Barrier Assessment

Overview
Journal Physiol Rep
Specialty Physiology
Date 2021 Oct 4
PMID 34605187
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Electrical cell-substrate impedance sensing (ECIS) is an in vitro methodology for measuring the barrier integrity of a variety of cell types, including pulmonary endothelial cells. These experiments are frequently used for in vitro assessment of lung injury. The data derived from ECIS experiments consists of repeated measures of resistance across an endothelial monolayer. As such, these data reflect the dynamic changes in electrical resistance that occur over time. Currently methodologies for assessing ECIS data rely on single point assessments of barrier function, such as the maximal drop in trans-endothelial electrical resistance (TER ). However, this approach ignores the myriad of changes in resistance that occur before and after the TER data point. Herein, we utilize polynomial curve fitting on experimentally generated ECIS data, thus allowing for comparing ECIS experiments by examining the mean polynomial coefficients between groups. We show that polynomial curves accurately fit a variety of ECIS data, and that concordance between TER and coefficient analysis varies by type of stimulus, suggesting that TER differences may not always correlate with a significant difference in the overall shape of the ECIS profile. Lastly, we identify factors that impact coefficient values obtained in our analyses, including the length of time devoted to baseline measurements before addition of stimuli. Polynomial coefficient analysis is another tool that can be used for more comprehensive interrogation of ECIS data to better understand the biological underpinnings that lead to changes in barrier dysfunction in vitro.

Citing Articles

MK2 nonenzymatically promotes nuclear translocation of caspase-3 and resultant apoptosis.

Del Rosario O, Suresh K, Kallem M, Singh G, Shah A, Zheng L Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2023; 324(5):L700-L711.

PMID: 36976920 PMC: 10190840. DOI: 10.1152/ajplung.00340.2022.


Comparison of polynomial fitting versus single time point analysis of ECIS data for barrier assessment.

Suresh K, Servinsky L, Johnston L, Punjabi N, Dudek S, Damarla M Physiol Rep. 2021; 9(19):e14983.

PMID: 34605187 PMC: 8488550. DOI: 10.14814/phy2.14983.

References
1.
Matute-Bello G, Frevert C, Martin T . Animal models of acute lung injury. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2008; 295(3):L379-99. PMC: 2536793. DOI: 10.1152/ajplung.00010.2008. View

2.
Parker J . Acute lung injury and pulmonary vascular permeability: use of transgenic models. Compr Physiol. 2013; 1(2):835-82. DOI: 10.1002/cphy.c100013. View

3.
Michalick L, Weidenfeld S, Grimmer B, Fatykhova D, Solymosi P, Behrens F . Plasma mediators in patients with severe COVID-19 cause lung endothelial barrier failure. Eur Respir J. 2020; 57(3). PMC: 7651836. DOI: 10.1183/13993003.02384-2020. View

4.
Tiruppathi C, Malik A, Del Vecchio P, Keese C, Giaever I . Electrical method for detection of endothelial cell shape change in real time: assessment of endothelial barrier function. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992; 89(17):7919-23. PMC: 49826. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.89.17.7919. View

5.
Ourradi K, Blythe T, Jarrett C, Barratt S, Welsh G, Millar A . VEGF isoforms have differential effects on permeability of human pulmonary microvascular endothelial cells. Respir Res. 2017; 18(1):116. PMC: 5457598. DOI: 10.1186/s12931-017-0602-1. View