» Articles » PMID: 34603501

Domestication-induced Reduction in Eye Size Revealed in Multiple Common Garden Experiments: The Case of Atlantic Salmon ( L.)

Abstract

Domestication leads to changes in traits that are under directional selection in breeding programmes, though unintentional changes in nonproduction traits can also arise. In offspring of escaping fish and any hybrid progeny, such unintentionally altered traits may reduce fitness in the wild. Atlantic salmon breeding programmes were established in the early 1970s, resulting in genetic changes in multiple traits. However, the impact of domestication on eye size has not been studied. We measured body size corrected eye size in 4000 salmon from six common garden experiments conducted under artificial and natural conditions, in freshwater and saltwater environments, in two countries. Within these common gardens, offspring of domesticated and wild parents were crossed to produce 11 strains, with varying genetic backgrounds (wild, domesticated, F1 hybrids, F2 hybrids and backcrosses). Size-adjusted eye size was influenced by both genetic and environmental factors. Domesticated fish reared under artificial conditions had smaller adjusted eye size when compared to wild fish reared under identical conditions, in both the freshwater and marine environments, and in both Irish and Norwegian experiments. However, in parr that had been introduced into a river environment shortly after hatching and sampled at the end of their first summer, differences in adjusted eye size observed among genetic groups were of a reduced magnitude and were nonsignificant in 2-year-old sea migrating smolts sampled in the river immediately prior to sea entry. Collectively, our findings could suggest that where natural selection is present, individuals with reduced eye size are maladapted and consequently have reduced fitness, building on our understanding of the mechanisms that underlie a well-documented reduction in the fitness of the progeny of domesticated salmon, including hybrid progeny, in the wild.

Citing Articles

Consequences of domestication in eastern oyster: Insights from whole genomic analyses.

Zhao H, Guo X, Wang W, Wang Z, Rawson P, Wilbur A Evol Appl. 2024; 17(6):e13710.

PMID: 38817396 PMC: 11134191. DOI: 10.1111/eva.13710.


Investigating the role of genetic variation in and in the domestication of gilthead seabream ( Linnaeus) and European seabass ( Linnaeus).

Moulistanos A, Nikolaou T, Sismanoglou S, Gkagkavouzis K, Karaiskou N, Antonopoulou E Ecol Evol. 2023; 13(11):e10727.

PMID: 38020694 PMC: 10654472. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.10727.


Domestication-induced reduction in eye size revealed in multiple common garden experiments: The case of Atlantic salmon ( L.).

Perry W, Kaufmann J, Solberg M, Brodie C, Coral Medina A, Pillay K Evol Appl. 2021; 14(9):2319-2332.

PMID: 34603501 PMC: 8477603. DOI: 10.1111/eva.13297.

References
1.
Rauw W, Johnson A, Gomez-Raya L, Dekkers J . A Hypothesis and Review of the Relationship between Selection for Improved Production Efficiency, Coping Behavior, and Domestication. Front Genet. 2017; 8:134. PMC: 5624995. DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2017.00134. View

2.
Powers M, Bassi C, Raymond P . Lighting conditions and retinal development in goldfish: absolute visual sensitivity. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1988; 29(1):37-43. View

3.
Solberg M, Zhang Z, Nilsen F, Glover K . Growth reaction norms of domesticated, wild and hybrid Atlantic salmon families in response to differing social and physical environments. BMC Evol Biol. 2013; 13:234. PMC: 4231500. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2148-13-234. View

4.
Harvey A, Solberg M, Glover K, Taylor M, Creer S, Carvalho G . Plasticity in response to feed availability: Does feeding regime influence the relative growth performance of domesticated, wild and hybrid Atlantic salmon Salmo salar parr?. J Fish Biol. 2016; 89(3):1754-68. DOI: 10.1111/jfb.13076. View

5.
Meuthen D, Ferrari M, Lane T, Chivers D . Predation risk induces age- and sex-specific morphological plastic responses in the fathead minnow Pimephales promelas. Sci Rep. 2019; 9(1):15378. PMC: 6814781. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-51591-1. View