» Articles » PMID: 34587999

Increasing the Power of Interpretation for Soil Metaproteomics Data

Overview
Journal Microbiome
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialties Genetics
Microbiology
Date 2021 Sep 30
PMID 34587999
Citations 19
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Soil and sediment microorganisms are highly phylogenetically diverse but are currently largely under-represented in public molecular databases. Their functional characterization by means of metaproteomics is usually performed using metagenomic sequences acquired for the same sample. However, such hugely diverse metagenomic datasets are difficult to assemble; in parallel, theoretical proteomes from isolates available in generic databases are of high quality. Both these factors advocate for the use of theoretical proteomes in metaproteomics interpretation pipelines. Here, we examined a number of database construction strategies with a view to increasing the outputs of metaproteomics studies performed on soil samples.

Results: The number of peptide-spectrum matches was found to be of comparable magnitude when using public or sample-specific metagenomics-derived databases. However, numbers were significantly increased when a combination of both types of information was used in a two-step cascaded search. Our data also indicate that the functional annotation of the metaproteomics dataset can be maximized by using a combination of both types of databases.

Conclusions: A two-step strategy combining sample-specific metagenome database and public databases such as the non-redundant NCBI database and a massive soil gene catalog allows maximizing the metaproteomic interpretation both in terms of ratio of assigned spectra and retrieval of function-derived information. Video abstract.

Citing Articles

The ribosome profiling landscape of yeast reveals a high diversity in pervasive translation.

Papadopoulos C, Arbes H, Cornu D, Chevrollier N, Blanchet S, Roginski P Genome Biol. 2024; 25(1):268.

PMID: 39402662 PMC: 11472626. DOI: 10.1186/s13059-024-03403-7.


[Microbial metaproteomics--From sample processing to data acquisition and analysis].

Wu E, Qiao L Se Pu. 2024; 42(7):658-668.

PMID: 38966974 PMC: 11224941. DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1123.2024.02009.


Metaproteomics for Coinfections in the Upper Respiratory Tract: The Case of COVID-19.

Bihani S, Gupta A, Mehta S, Rajczewski A, Griffin T, Jagtap P Methods Mol Biol. 2024; 2820:165-185.

PMID: 38941023 DOI: 10.1007/978-1-0716-3910-8_15.


Contigs directed gene annotation (ConDiGA) for accurate protein sequence database construction in metaproteomics.

Wu E, Mallawaarachchi V, Zhao J, Yang Y, Liu H, Wang X Microbiome. 2024; 12(1):58.

PMID: 38504332 PMC: 10949615. DOI: 10.1186/s40168-024-01775-3.


Life at the borderlands: microbiomes of interfaces critical to One Health.

Law S, Mathes F, Paten A, Alexandre P, Regmi R, Reid C FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2024; 48(2).

PMID: 38425054 PMC: 10977922. DOI: 10.1093/femsre/fuae008.


References
1.
Seifert J, Muth T . Editorial for Special Issue: Metaproteomics. Proteomes. 2019; 7(1). PMC: 6473379. DOI: 10.3390/proteomes7010009. View

2.
Kleiner M . Metaproteomics: Much More than Measuring Gene Expression in Microbial Communities. mSystems. 2019; 4(3). PMC: 6529545. DOI: 10.1128/mSystems.00115-19. View

3.
Lin W, Wu L, Lin S, Zhang A, Zhou M, Lin R . Metaproteomic analysis of ratoon sugarcane rhizospheric soil. BMC Microbiol. 2013; 13:135. PMC: 3687580. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2180-13-135. View

4.
Meyer F, Paarmann D, DSouza M, Olson R, Glass E, Kubal M . The metagenomics RAST server - a public resource for the automatic phylogenetic and functional analysis of metagenomes. BMC Bioinformatics. 2008; 9:386. PMC: 2563014. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2105-9-386. View

5.
Tanca A, Palomba A, Deligios M, Cubeddu T, Fraumene C, Biosa G . Evaluating the impact of different sequence databases on metaproteome analysis: insights from a lab-assembled microbial mixture. PLoS One. 2013; 8(12):e82981. PMC: 3857319. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0082981. View