Comparison of Two Different Decellularization Methods for Processed Nerve Allograft

The use of processed nerve allografts as an alternative to autologous nerve grafts, the gold standard treatment for peripheral nerve defects, is increasing. However, it is not widely used in Korea due to cost and insurance issues. Moreover, the main detergent used in the conventional Hudson method is unavailable. Therefore, a new nerve allograft decellularization process is needed. We aimed to compare the traditional Hudson method with a novel decellularization process that may remove cellular content more efficiently while preserving the extracellular matrix (ECM) structure using low concentration sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) and nuclease. After each decellularization process, DNA content was measured in nerve tissue. Masson's trichrome staining and scanning electron microscopy were performed to determine the state of preservation of the ECM. A significantly greater amount of DNA content was removed in the novel method, and the ECM structure was preserved in both methods. For the in vivo study, a 15-mm long sciatic nerve defect was created in two groups of Sprague-Dawley rats, and processed nerve allografts decellularized using the Hudson or novel method were transplanted. Functional and histological recovery results were measured 12 weeks post-transplantation. Ankle contracture angle, maximal isometric tetanic force of the tibialis anterior (TA), and the TA mass were compared between the groups, as well as the percent neural tissue (100 × neural area/intrafascicular area). There was no significant difference in functional and histological nerve recovery between the methods. The novel method is appropriate for developing a processed nerve allograft.