» Articles » PMID: 18314000

A Mechanical Evaluation of Three Decellularization Methods in the Design of a Xenogeneic Scaffold for Tissue Engineering the Temporomandibular Joint Disc

Overview
Journal Acta Biomater
Publisher Elsevier
Date 2008 Mar 4
PMID 18314000
Citations 48
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Tissue-engineered temporomandibular joint (TMJ) discs offer a viable treatment option for patients with severe joint internal derangement. To date, only a handful of TMJ tissue engineering studies have been carried out and all have incorporated the use of synthetic scaffold materials. These current scaffolds have shown limited success in recapitulating morphological and functional aspects of the native disc tissue. The present study is the first to investigate the potential of a xenogeneic scaffold for use in tissue engineering the TMJ disc. The effects of decellularization agents on the disc's mechanical properties were assessed using three common decellularization protocols: Triton X-100, sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) and an acetone/ethanol solution. Decellularized scaffolds were subsequently characterized through cyclic mechanical testing at physiologically relevant frequencies to determine which chemical agent most accurately preserved the native tissue properties. Results have shown that porcine discs treated with SDS most closely matched the energy dissipation capabilities and resistance to deformation of the native tissue. Treatments using Triton X-100 caused the resultant tissue to become relatively softer with inferior energy dissipation capabilities, while treatment using acetone/ethanol led to a significantly stiffer and dehydrated material. These findings support the potential of a porcine-derived scaffold decellularized by SDS as a xenograft for TMJ disc reconstruction.

Citing Articles

Investigation of scaffold manufacturing conditions for 3-dimensional culture of myogenic cell line derived from black sea bream ().

Lee Y, Jeong E, Kim Y, Gong S Cytotechnology. 2024; 77(1):18.

PMID: 39676766 PMC: 11635079. DOI: 10.1007/s10616-024-00676-5.


Decellularization and Their Significance for Tissue Regeneration in the Era of 3D Bioprinting.

Gadre M, Kasturi M, Agarwal P, Vasanthan K ACS Omega. 2024; 9(7):7375-7392.

PMID: 38405516 PMC: 10883024. DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.3c08930.


Extracellular matrix-derived materials for tissue engineering and regenerative medicine: A journey from isolation to characterization and application.

Noro J, Vilaca-Faria H, Reis R, Pirraco R Bioact Mater. 2024; 34:494-519.

PMID: 38298755 PMC: 10827697. DOI: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2024.01.004.


Soft Biomimetic Approach for the Development of Calcinosis-Resistant Glutaraldehyde-Fixed Biomaterials for Cardiovascular Surgery.

Zvyagina A, Minaychev V, Kobyakova M, Lomovskaya Y, Senotov A, Pyatina K Biomimetics (Basel). 2023; 8(4).

PMID: 37622962 PMC: 10452421. DOI: 10.3390/biomimetics8040357.


Quality Comparison of Decellularized Omentum Prepared by Different Protocols for Tissue Engineering Applications.

Fazelian-Dehkordi K, Mesbah Ardekani S, Talaei-Khozani T Cell J. 2022; 24(5):267-276.

PMID: 35717569 PMC: 9445523. DOI: 10.22074/cellj.2022.7968.