The Impact of Anionic Polymers on Gene Delivery: How Composition and Assembly Help Evading the Toxicity-efficiency Dilemma

Overview

Journal J Nanobiotechnology

Publisher Biomed Central

Specialty Biotechnology

Date 2021 Sep 28

PMID 34579715

Citations 13

Authors

Friederike Richter

Katharina Leer

Liam Martin

Prosper Mapfumo

Jana I Solomun

Maren T Kuchenbrod

Stephanie Hoeppener

Johannes C Brendel

Anja Traeger

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Cationic polymers have been widely studied for non-viral gene delivery due to their ability to bind genetic material and to interact with cellular membranes. However, their charged nature carries the risk of increased cytotoxicity and interaction with serum proteins, limiting their potential in vivo application. Therefore, hydrophilic or anionic shielding polymers are applied to counteract these effects. Herein, a series of micelle-forming and micelle-shielding polymers were synthesized via RAFT polymerization. The copolymer poly[(n-butyl acrylate)-b-(2-(dimethyl amino)ethyl acrylamide)] (P(nBA-b-DMAEAm)) was assembled into cationic micelles and different shielding polymers were applied, i.e., poly(acrylic acid) (PAA), poly(4-acryloyl morpholine) (PNAM) or P(NAM-b-AA) block copolymer. These systems were compared to a triblock terpolymer micelle comprising PAA as the middle block. The assemblies were investigated regarding their morphology, interaction with pDNA, cytotoxicity, transfection efficiency, polyplex uptake and endosomal escape. The naked cationic micelle exhibited superior transfection efficiency, but increased cytotoxicity. The addition of shielding polymers led to reduced toxicity. In particular, the triblock terpolymer micelle convinced with high cell viability and no significant loss in efficiency. The highest shielding effect was achieved by layering micelles with P(NAM-b-AA) supporting the colloidal stability at neutral zeta potential and completely restoring cell viability while maintaining moderate transfection efficiencies. The high potential of this micelle-layer-combination for gene delivery was illustrated for the first time.

Citing Articles

Strong Membrane Permeabilization Activity Can Reduce Selectivity of Cyclic Antimicrobial Peptides.

Beck K, Nandy J, Hoernke M J Phys Chem B. 2025; 129(9):2446-2460.

PMID: 39969852 PMC: 11891913. DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcb.4c05019.

Harnessing Guanidinium and Imidazole Functional Groups: A Dual-Charged Polymer Strategy for Enhanced Gene Delivery.

Mapfumo P, Reichel L, Leer K, Egger J, Dzierza A, Peneva K ACS Macro Lett. 2024; 13(8):1000-1007.

PMID: 39052525 PMC: 11340021. DOI: 10.1021/acsmacrolett.4c00321.

Recent Progress in Polyion Complex Nanoparticles with Enhanced Stability for Drug Delivery.

Ma X, Zhao T, Ren X, Lin H, He P Polymers (Basel). 2024; 16(13).

PMID: 39000726 PMC: 11244007. DOI: 10.3390/polym16131871.

Optimizing Biocompatibility and Gene Delivery with DMAEA and DMAEAm: A Niacin-Derived Copolymer Approach.

Mapfumo P, Reichel L, Andre T, Hoeppener S, Rudolph L, Traeger A Biomacromolecules. 2024; 25(8):4749-4761.

PMID: 38963401 PMC: 11323007. DOI: 10.1021/acs.biomac.4c00007.

Amino-Acid-Derived Anionic Polyacrylamides with Tailored Hydrophobicity-Physicochemical Properties and Cellular Interactions.

De Breuck J, Streiber M, Ringleb M, Schroder D, Herzog N, Schubert U ACS Polym Au. 2024; 4(3):222-234.

PMID: 38882030 PMC: 11177303. DOI: 10.1021/acspolymersau.3c00048.

References

Wang H, Ding S, Zhang Z, Wang L, You Y . Cationic micelle: A promising nanocarrier for gene delivery with high transfection efficiency. J Gene Med. 2019; 21(7):e3101. DOI: 10.1002/jgm.3101. View

Oerlemans C, Bult W, Bos M, Storm G, Nijsen J, Hennink W . Polymeric micelles in anticancer therapy: targeting, imaging and triggered release. Pharm Res. 2010; 27(12):2569-89. PMC: 2982955. DOI: 10.1007/s11095-010-0233-4. View

Catrouillet S, Brendel J, Larnaudie S, Barlow T, Jolliffe K, Perrier S . Tunable Length of Cyclic Peptide-Polymer Conjugate Self-Assemblies in Water. ACS Macro Lett. 2022; 5(10):1119-1123. DOI: 10.1021/acsmacrolett.6b00586. View

Braun S, Pokorna S, Sachl R, Hof M, Heerklotz H, Hoernke M . Biomembrane Permeabilization: Statistics of Individual Leakage Events Harmonize the Interpretation of Vesicle Leakage. ACS Nano. 2017; 12(1):813-819. DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.7b08184. View

Li B, Yuan Z, Hung H, Ma J, Jain P, Tsao C . Revealing the Immunogenic Risk of Polymers. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2018; 57(42):13873-13876. DOI: 10.1002/anie.201808615. View

Kierstead P, Okochi H, Venditto V, Chuong T, Kivimae S, Frechet J . The effect of polymer backbone chemistry on the induction of the accelerated blood clearance in polymer modified liposomes. J Control Release. 2015; 213:1-9. PMC: 4684485. DOI: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2015.06.023. View

Siegwart D, Oh J, Matyjaszewski K . ATRP in the design of functional materials for biomedical applications. Prog Polym Sci. 2013; 37(1):18-37. PMC: 3604987. DOI: 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2011.08.001. View

Richter F, Martin L, Leer K, Moek E, Hausig F, Brendel J . Tuning of endosomal escape and gene expression by functional groups, molecular weight and transfection medium: a structure-activity relationship study. J Mater Chem B. 2020; 8(23):5026-5041. DOI: 10.1039/d0tb00340a. View

Bus T, Traeger A, Schubert U . The great escape: how cationic polyplexes overcome the endosomal barrier. J Mater Chem B. 2020; 6(43):6904-6918. DOI: 10.1039/c8tb00967h. View

10.

Ishihara T, Maeda T, Sakamoto H, Takasaki N, Shigyo M, Ishida T . Evasion of the accelerated blood clearance phenomenon by coating of nanoparticles with various hydrophilic polymers. Biomacromolecules. 2010; 11(10):2700-6. DOI: 10.1021/bm100754e. View

11.

Sanati S, Taghavi S, Abnous K, Taghdisi S, Babaei M, Ramezani M . Fabrication of anionic dextran-coated micelles for aptamer targeted delivery of camptothecin and survivin-shRNA to colon adenocarcinoma. Gene Ther. 2021; 29(1-2):55-68. DOI: 10.1038/s41434-021-00234-0. View

12.

Yousefpour Marzbali M, Khosroushahi A . Polymeric micelles as mighty nanocarriers for cancer gene therapy: a review. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2017; 79(4):637-649. DOI: 10.1007/s00280-017-3273-1. View

13.

Mellman I, Fuchs R, Helenius A . Acidification of the endocytic and exocytic pathways. Annu Rev Biochem. 1986; 55:663-700. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.bi.55.070186.003311. View

14.

Yu L, Lin C, Zheng Z, Li Z, Wang X . Self-assembly of pH-responsive biodegradable mixed micelles based on anionic and cationic polycarbonates for doxorubicin delivery. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. 2016; 145:392-400. DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2016.05.029. View

15.

Richter F, Mapfumo P, Martin L, Solomun J, Hausig F, Frietsch J . Improved gene delivery to K-562 leukemia cells by lipoic acid modified block copolymer micelles. J Nanobiotechnology. 2021; 19(1):70. PMC: 7936509. DOI: 10.1186/s12951-021-00801-y. View

16.

Mishra S, Webster P, Davis M . PEGylation significantly affects cellular uptake and intracellular trafficking of non-viral gene delivery particles. Eur J Cell Biol. 2004; 83(3):97-111. DOI: 10.1078/0171-9335-00363. View

17.

Pergushov D, Muller A, Schacher F . Micellar interpolyelectrolyte complexes. Chem Soc Rev. 2012; 41(21):6888-901. DOI: 10.1039/c2cs35135h. View

18.

Tan Z, Jiang Y, Zhang W, Karls L, Lodge T, Reineke T . Polycation Architecture and Assembly Direct Successful Gene Delivery: Micelleplexes Outperform Polyplexes via Optimal DNA Packaging. J Am Chem Soc. 2019; 141(40):15804-15817. DOI: 10.1021/jacs.9b06218. View

19.

Fang Y, Xue J, Gao S, Lu A, Yang D, Jiang H . Cleavable PEGylation: a strategy for overcoming the "PEG dilemma" in efficient drug delivery. Drug Deliv. 2017; 24(sup1):22-32. PMC: 8812578. DOI: 10.1080/10717544.2017.1388451. View

20.

Cabral H, Miyata K, Osada K, Kataoka K . Block Copolymer Micelles in Nanomedicine Applications. Chem Rev. 2018; 118(14):6844-6892. DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00199. View