» Articles » PMID: 34578817

A Feasibility and Pilot Study of a Personalized Nutrition Intervention in Mobile Food Pantry Users in Northeastern Connecticut

Overview
Journal Nutrients
Date 2021 Sep 28
PMID 34578817
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: This pilot study assessed the effectiveness and acceptability of personalized nutrition intervention for mobile food pantry users.

Methods: The 8-week intervention recruited 25 participants in the control ( = 13) and in the treatment ( = 12) groups (60% obese). Personalized nutrition and health reports were generated based on baseline dietary intake and health status. The treatment group received weekly phone counseling and nutrition education, while the control group was only contacted to ensure compliance. The primary outcomes were 8-week changes in weight and diet quality score, assessed by the Healthy Eating Index.

Results: The acceptability of the intervention was assessed by the eligibility rate, recruitment rate (62.5%), and drop-out rate (36%). Following the intervention, there was a significant decrease in weight (mean ± standard deviation, -2.3% ± 2.4%) among all participants ( < 0.05). Diet-quality improved (4.54% in treatment vs. 0.18% in control), but was ultimately non-significant ( = 0.284).

Conclusions And Implications: A personalized nutrition education intervention in mobile food pantry users may be an acceptable and effective intervention to encourage weight loss through dietary improvements.

Citing Articles

Feasibility and acceptability of a cohort study baseline data collection of device-measured physical behaviors and cardiometabolic health in Saudi Arabia: expanding the Prospective Physical Activity, Sitting and Sleep consortium (ProPASS) in the....

Alaqil A, Del Pozo Cruz B, Alothman S, Ahmadi M, Caserotti P, Al-Hazzaa H BMC Public Health. 2024; 24(1):1379.

PMID: 38778331 PMC: 11112840. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-024-18867-2.


Precision Nutrition to Improve Risk Factors of Obesity and Type 2 Diabetes.

Antwi J Curr Nutr Rep. 2023; 12(4):679-694.

PMID: 37610590 PMC: 10766837. DOI: 10.1007/s13668-023-00491-y.


Low-Income Families' Direct Participation in Food-Systems Innovation to Promote Healthy Food Behaviors.

Katre A, Raddatz B Nutrients. 2023; 15(5).

PMID: 36904271 PMC: 10005603. DOI: 10.3390/nu15051271.


Association of human gut microbiota composition and metabolic functions with Ficus hirta Vahl dietary supplementation.

Xiao R, Luo G, Liao W, Chen S, Han S, Liang S NPJ Sci Food. 2022; 6(1):45.

PMID: 36167833 PMC: 9515076. DOI: 10.1038/s41538-022-00161-3.


Increasing Access to Healthy Foods through Improving Food Environment: A Review of Mixed Methods Intervention Studies with Residents of Low-Income Communities.

Ziso D, Chun O, Puglisi M Nutrients. 2022; 14(11).

PMID: 35684077 PMC: 9182982. DOI: 10.3390/nu14112278.

References
1.
Duffy P, Zizza C, Jacoby J, Tayie F . Diet quality is low among female food pantry clients in Eastern Alabama. J Nutr Educ Behav. 2009; 41(6):414-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.jneb.2008.09.002. View

2.
Hiza H, Casavale K, Guenther P, Davis C . Diet quality of Americans differs by age, sex, race/ethnicity, income, and education level. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2012; 113(2):297-306. DOI: 10.1016/j.jand.2012.08.011. View

3.
Neter J, Dijkstra S, Twisk J, Visser M, Brouwer I . Improving the dietary quality of food parcels leads to improved dietary intake in Dutch food bank recipients-effects of a randomized controlled trial. Eur J Nutr. 2020; 59(8):3491-3501. PMC: 7669798. DOI: 10.1007/s00394-020-02182-8. View

4.
Aggarwal A, Monsivais P, Cook A, Drewnowski A . Does diet cost mediate the relation between socioeconomic position and diet quality?. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2011; 65(9):1059-66. PMC: 3157585. DOI: 10.1038/ejcn.2011.72. View

5.
Lo Y, Chang Y, Lee M, Wahlqvist M . Health and nutrition economics: diet costs are associated with diet quality. Asia Pac J Clin Nutr. 2009; 18(4):598-604. View