» Articles » PMID: 34573564

Toward Precise Nutrient Value of Feed in Growing Pigs: Effect of Meal Size, Frequency and Dietary Fibre on Nutrient Utilisation

Overview
Journal Animals (Basel)
Date 2021 Sep 28
PMID 34573564
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Nutritional values of ingredients have been and still are the subject of many studies to reduce security margins of nutrients when formulating diets to reduce feed cost. In most studies, pigs are fed a limited amount of feed in a limited number of meals that do not represent how pigs are fed in commercial farm conditions. With free access to feed, pigs follow their intrinsic feeding behaviour. Feed intake is regulated by satiety and satiation signals. Reducing the feed intake level or feeding frequency can affect digestibility and transit time and induce metabolic changes. To reduce feed costs, alternative ingredients that are frequently rich in dietary fibre are added to diets. Fibre acts on the digestion process and transit time by decreasing energy density and causing viscosity. Various analyses of fibre can be realised, and the measured fibre fraction can vary. Exogenous enzymes can be added to counteract the effect of fibre, but digestive tract conditions, influenced by meal size and frequency, can affect the efficiency of supplemented enzymes. In conclusion, the frequency and size of the meals can affect the digestibility of nutrients by modulating gastrointestinal tract conditions (pH and transit time), metabolites (glucose and short-chain fatty acids) and hormones (glucagon-like peptide 1 and peptide tyrosine tyrosine).

Citing Articles

Nutritional values of soybean meal from different sources in multiparous sows.

Wang K, Huang L, Yang P, Zhuo Y, Che L, Xu S Anim Nutr. 2025; 20:80-87.

PMID: 39967698 PMC: 11833779. DOI: 10.1016/j.aninu.2024.09.004.


Daily feeding frequency impacts muscle characteristics and fat deposition in finishing pigs associated with alterations in microbiota composition and bile acid profile.

Hu L, Tang H, Xie Z, Yi H, Feng L, Zhou P Front Microbiol. 2025; 16:1510354.

PMID: 39935644 PMC: 11813218. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2025.1510354.


Evaluation of multienzyme supplementation and fiber levels on nutrient and energy digestibility of diets fed to gestating sows and growing pigs.

Shipman G, Perez-Palencia J, Rogiewicz A, Patterson R, Levesque C J Anim Sci. 2023; 101.

PMID: 37936246 PMC: 10752346. DOI: 10.1093/jas/skad375.


Wheat bran inclusion level impacts its net energy by shaping gut microbiota and regulating heat production in gestating sows.

Xu S, Yu Z, Li Z, Wang Z, Shi C, Li J Anim Nutr. 2023; 15:45-57.

PMID: 37779510 PMC: 10539868. DOI: 10.1016/j.aninu.2023.06.013.


Nutritional values of cottonseed meal from different sources fed to gestating and non-pregnant sows.

Zhuo Y, Zou X, Wang Y, Jiang X, Sun M, Xu S J Anim Sci. 2023; 101.

PMID: 37085272 PMC: 10199790. DOI: 10.1093/jas/skad118.


References
1.
Vargovic L, Hermesch S, Athorn R, Bunter K . Feed intake and feeding behavior traits for gestating sows recorded using electronic sow feeders. J Anim Sci. 2020; 99(1). PMC: 7799585. DOI: 10.1093/jas/skaa395. View

2.
Tai M, Castillo P, Pi-Sunyer F . Meal size and frequency: effect on the thermic effect of food. Am J Clin Nutr. 1991; 54(5):783-7. DOI: 10.1093/ajcn/54.5.783. View

3.
Beaulieu A, Williams N, Patience J . Response to dietary digestible energy concentration in growing pigs fed cereal grain-based diets. J Anim Sci. 2008; 87(3):965-76. DOI: 10.2527/jas.2007-0834. View

4.
Suriano F, Van Hul M, Cani P . Gut microbiota and regulation of myokine-adipokine function. Curr Opin Pharmacol. 2020; 52:9-17. DOI: 10.1016/j.coph.2020.03.006. View

5.
Owusu-Asiedu A, Patience J, Laarveld B, Van Kessel A, Simmins P, Zijlstra R . Effects of guar gum and cellulose on digesta passage rate, ileal microbial populations, energy and protein digestibility, and performance of grower pigs. J Anim Sci. 2006; 84(4):843-52. DOI: 10.2527/2006.844843x. View