» Articles » PMID: 34572950

Prostate Health Index and Multiparametric MRI: Partners in Crime Fighting Overdiagnosis and Overtreatment in Prostate Cancer

Abstract

Widespread use of PSA as the standard tool for prostate cancer (PCa) diagnosis led to a high rate of overdiagnosis and overtreatment. In this study, we evaluated the performance of the prostate health index (PHI) and multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) for the prediction of positive biopsy and of high-grade PCa at radical prostatectomy (RP). To this end, we prospectively enrolled 196 biopsy-naïve patients who underwent mpMRI. A subgroup of 116 subjects with biopsy-proven PCa underwent surgery. We found that PHI significantly outperformed both PI-RADS score (difference in AUC: 0.14; < 0.001) and PHI density (difference in AUC: 0.08; = 0.002) in the ability to predict positive biopsy with a cut-off value of 42.7 as the best threshold. Conversely, comparing the performance in the identification of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) at RP, we found that PHI ≥ 61.68 and PI-RADS score ≥ 4 were able to identify csPCa (Gleason score ≥ 7 (3 + 4)) both alone and added to a base model including age, PSA, fPSA-to-tPSA ratio and prostate volume. In conclusion, PHI had a better ability than PI-RADS score to predict positive biopsy, whereas it had a comparable performance in the identification of pathological csPCa.

Citing Articles

Pathologic characteristics and management strategies for two categories of prostate cancer patients with low prostate-specific antigen undergoing radical prostatectomy.

Sun J, Gao S, Wang X, Yang Z, Xu J, Jiang Z Transl Androl Urol. 2025; 14(1):37-46.

PMID: 39974814 PMC: 11833536. DOI: 10.21037/tau-24-538.


Normalization of tumor vasculature by imiquimod: proposal for a new anticancer therapeutic indication for a TLR7 agonist.

Magdalena J, Justyna C, Joanna C, Ryszard S, Alina D, Dorota S Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2025; 74(3):90.

PMID: 39891776 PMC: 11787066. DOI: 10.1007/s00262-025-03943-2.


The prostate-gland asymmetry affects the 3- and 12-month continence recovery after RARP in patients with small prostate glands: a single center study.

Di Bello F, Morra S, Fraia A, Pezone G, Polverino F, Granata G J Robot Surg. 2024; 18(1):319.

PMID: 39122911 PMC: 11315750. DOI: 10.1007/s11701-024-02024-3.


Advances in multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging combined with biomarkers for the diagnosis of high-grade prostate cancer.

Li S, Zha M, Wang Q, Tang Y Front Surg. 2024; 11:1429831.

PMID: 39081487 PMC: 11286397. DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2024.1429831.


Refining clinically relevant cut-offs of prostate specific antigen density for risk stratification in patients with PI-RADS 3 lesions.

Mjaess G, Haddad L, Jabbour T, Baudewyns A, Bourgeno H, Lefebvre Y Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2024; 28(1):173-179.

PMID: 39048664 DOI: 10.1038/s41391-024-00872-6.


References
1.
Norris J, Carmona Echeverria L, Bott S, Brown L, Burns-Cox N, Dudderidge T . What Type of Prostate Cancer Is Systematically Overlooked by Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging? An Analysis from the PROMIS Cohort. Eur Urol. 2020; 78(2):163-170. PMC: 7397509. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2020.04.029. View

2.
Foj L, Filella X . Development and internal validation of a novel PHI-nomogram to identify aggressive prostate cancer. Clin Chim Acta. 2019; 501:174-178. DOI: 10.1016/j.cca.2019.10.039. View

3.
Rapisarda S, Bada M, Crocetto F, Barone B, Arcaniolo D, Polara A . The role of multiparametric resonance and biopsy in prostate cancer detection: comparison with definitive histological report after laparoscopic/robotic radical prostatectomy. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2020; 45(12):4178-4184. PMC: 7716945. DOI: 10.1007/s00261-020-02798-8. View

4.
Pastor-Navarro B, Rubio-Briones J, Borque-Fernando A, Esteban L, Dominguez-Escrig J, Lopez-Guerrero J . Active Surveillance in Prostate Cancer: Role of Available Biomarkers in Daily Practice. Int J Mol Sci. 2021; 22(12). PMC: 8230496. DOI: 10.3390/ijms22126266. View

5.
Tataru O, Vartolomei M, Rassweiler J, Virgil O, Lucarelli G, Porpiglia F . Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Prostate Cancer Patient Management-Current Trends and Future Perspectives. Diagnostics (Basel). 2021; 11(2). PMC: 7924061. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics11020354. View