» Articles » PMID: 34572384

Modelling Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis In Vivo-A Close Transcriptomic Similarity Supports the Guinea Pig Disease Model

Overview
Journal Biomedicines
Date 2021 Sep 28
PMID 34572384
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The successful development of effective treatments against nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) is significantly set back by the limited availability of predictive preclinical models, thereby delaying and reducing patient recovery. Uniquely, the guinea pig NASH model develops hepatic histopathology and fibrosis resembling that of human patients, supported by similarities in selected cellular pathways. The high-throughput sequencing of guinea pig livers with fibrotic NASH ( = 6) and matched controls ( = 6) showed a clear separation of the transcriptomic profile between NASH and control animals. A comparison to NASH patients with mild disease (GSE126848) revealed a 45.2% overlap in differentially expressed genes, while pathway analysis showed a 34% match between the top 50 enriched pathways in patients with advanced NASH (GSE49541) and guinea pigs. Gene set enrichment analysis highlighted the similarity to human patients (GSE49541), also when compared to three murine models (GSE52748, GSE38141, GSE67680), and leading edge genes and were highly expressed in both guinea pigs and NASH patients. Nine candidate genes were identified as highly correlated with hepatic fibrosis (correlation coefficient > 0.8), and showed a similar expression pattern in NASH patients. Of these, two candidate genes ( and ) encode secreted factors, warranting further investigations as potential biomarkers of human NASH progression. This study demonstrates key similarities in guinea pig and human NASH, supporting increased predictability when translating research findings to human patients.

Citing Articles

A Guinea Pig Model of Pediatric Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatohepatitis: Poor Vitamin C Status May Advance Disease.

Pedersen K, Poojari A, Colberg S, Mechernsee S, Iversen J, Barres R Nutrients. 2025; 17(2).

PMID: 39861421 PMC: 11767659. DOI: 10.3390/nu17020291.


Immunology and treatments of fatty liver disease.

Tang S, Wu S, Zhang W, Ma L, Zuo L, Wang H Arch Toxicol. 2024; 99(1):127-152.

PMID: 39692857 DOI: 10.1007/s00204-024-03920-1.


Rodent model of metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease: a systematic review.

Cui X, Li H, Li L, Xie C, Gao J, Chen Y J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2024; 40(1):48-66.

PMID: 39322221 PMC: 11771679. DOI: 10.1111/jgh.16749.


The biological function of Serpinb9 and Serpinb9-based therapy.

Huang H, Mu Y, Li S Front Immunol. 2024; 15:1422113.

PMID: 38966643 PMC: 11222584. DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1422113.


Vitamin C Deficiency Exacerbates Dysfunction of Atherosclerotic Coronary Arteries in Guinea Pigs Fed a High-Fat Diet.

Skovsted G, Skat-Rordam J, Frokiaer A, Jensen H, Tveden-Nyborg P, Lykkesfeldt J Antioxidants (Basel). 2022; 11(11).

PMID: 36421412 PMC: 9686655. DOI: 10.3390/antiox11112226.


References
1.
Teufel A, Itzel T, Erhart W, Brosch M, Wang X, Kim Y . Comparison of Gene Expression Patterns Between Mouse Models of Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease and Liver Tissues From Patients. Gastroenterology. 2016; 151(3):513-525.e0. DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2016.05.051. View

2.
McDonald B, Kubes P . Interactions between CD44 and Hyaluronan in Leukocyte Trafficking. Front Immunol. 2015; 6:68. PMC: 4330908. DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2015.00068. View

3.
Kleiner D, Brunt E, Van Natta M, Behling C, Contos M, Cummings O . Design and validation of a histological scoring system for nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Hepatology. 2005; 41(6):1313-21. DOI: 10.1002/hep.20701. View

4.
He Y, Hwang S, Cai Y, Kim S, Xu M, Yang D . MicroRNA-223 Ameliorates Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis and Cancer by Targeting Multiple Inflammatory and Oncogenic Genes in Hepatocytes. Hepatology. 2019; 70(4):1150-1167. PMC: 6783322. DOI: 10.1002/hep.30645. View

5.
Marra F, Tacke F . Roles for chemokines in liver disease. Gastroenterology. 2014; 147(3):577-594.e1. DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2014.06.043. View