» Articles » PMID: 34568725

Significant Reduction in Hemarthrosis in Boys with Severe Hemophilia A: The China Hemophilia Individualized Low-dose Secondary Prophylaxis Study

Abstract

Introduction: In countries with restricted access to clotting factor concentrates, early implementation of low-dose prophylaxis is recommended over episodic treatment.

Objective: The objective of this 1-year prospective secondary prophylaxis study was to evaluate the efficacy of a dose/frequency escalating protocol in young boys with hemophilia A in China.

Methods: Boys were started on a low-dose protocol (minimum 10-15 IU/kg of factor VIII [FVIII] twice weekly). Escalation was based on index joint bleeding, swelling/persistent joint swelling, and serial ultrasound (gray scale and color Doppler) examinations of index joints.

Results: Thirty-three boys, median age 4.8 years (interquartile range, 3.8-6.1) were enrolled in a 3-month observation period that preceded a 1-year prophylaxis phase. A significant reduction in total bleeding events (43.0%, = .001), index joint bleeds (53.2%, = .002), and target index joint bleeds (70.0%, = 0.02) was observed during the prophylaxis phase. During the prophylaxis period, 40% of target joints resolved. The percentage of boys with zero index joint bleeds increased significantly (= .004) from 51.5% during the observation phase to 81.8% in last quarter of the prophylaxis phase (months 10-12). There was no progression of arthropathy based on physical examination (Hemophilia Joint Health Score), X-ray, and ultrasound obtained at entry into the prophylaxis phase and at study exit. The median FVIII consumption over the prophylaxis phase was 1786 IU/kg/y.

Conclusion: A low-dose, individualized prophylaxis protocol, guided by individual bleeding profiles and serial assessment of joint status, enables escalation of treatment intensity in boys with severe hemophilia A, leading to a significant reduction in bleeding events and reduction in target joint bleeding.

Citing Articles

Comparison between natural rubber knee support and sponge knee support on the protection of knee joint: A crossover randomized controlled study among patients with bleeding disorders.

Maneekhiew S, Kovitwanawong N, Raweekul S, Kijkunasathian C, Panuwannakorn M, Uampornvanich P Health Sci Rep. 2024; 7(4):e2003.

PMID: 38567187 PMC: 10985220. DOI: 10.1002/hsr2.2003.


[Analysis of the effects of low/intermediate dose of coagulation factor Ⅷ on 30 adult patients with severe hemophilia A in a single center].

Yuan Y, Xu P, Xu Y, Liu S, Shao X, Zhang W Zhonghua Xue Ye Xue Za Zhi. 2023; 44(1):38-42.

PMID: 36987721 PMC: 10067379. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-2727.2023.01.007.


Thromboelastography and thrombin generation assessments for pediatric severe hemophilia A patients are highly variable and not predictive of clinical phenotypes.

Mathews N, Pluthero F, Rand M, Stain A, Carcao M, Blanchette V Res Pract Thromb Haemost. 2022; 6(6):e12800.

PMID: 36186102 PMC: 9511091. DOI: 10.1002/rth2.12800.


Individualised prophylaxis based on personalised target trough FVIII level optimised clinical outcomes in paediatric patients with severe haemophilia A.

Huang K, Ai D, Li G, Zhen Y, Wang Y, Zhang N Haemophilia. 2022; 28(6):e209-e218.

PMID: 35850182 PMC: 9796890. DOI: 10.1111/hae.14635.


Significant reduction in hemarthrosis in boys with severe hemophilia A: The China hemophilia individualized low-dose secondary prophylaxis study.

Wu R, Li X, Yao W, Zhang Q, Zhou M, Zhang N Res Pract Thromb Haemost. 2021; 5(6):e12552.

PMID: 34568725 PMC: 8449287. DOI: 10.1002/rth2.12552.

References
1.
Kern M, Blanchette V, Stain A, Einarson T, Feldman B . Clinical and cost implications of target joints in Canadian boys with severe hemophilia A. J Pediatr. 2004; 145(5):628-34. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2004.06.082. View

2.
Iannazzo S, Cortesi P, Crea R, Steinitz K, Mantovani L, Gringeri A . Cost-effectiveness analysis of pharmacokinetic-driven prophylaxis vs. standard prophylaxis in patients with severe haemophilia A. Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis. 2016; 28(6):425-430. DOI: 10.1097/MBC.0000000000000610. View

3.
Srivastava A, Santagostino E, Dougall A, Kitchen S, Sutherland M, Pipe S . WFH Guidelines for the Management of Hemophilia, 3rd edition. Haemophilia. 2020; 26 Suppl 6:1-158. DOI: 10.1111/hae.14046. View

4.
Manco-Johnson M, Abshire T, Shapiro A, Riske B, Hacker M, Kilcoyne R . Prophylaxis versus episodic treatment to prevent joint disease in boys with severe hemophilia. N Engl J Med. 2007; 357(6):535-44. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa067659. View

5.
Wu R, Li X, Yao W, Zhang Q, Zhou M, Zhang N . Significant reduction in hemarthrosis in boys with severe hemophilia A: The China hemophilia individualized low-dose secondary prophylaxis study. Res Pract Thromb Haemost. 2021; 5(6):e12552. PMC: 8449287. DOI: 10.1002/rth2.12552. View