» Articles » PMID: 34564361

A Co-Culture Model of the Human Respiratory Tract to Discriminate the Toxicological Profile of Cationic Nanoparticles According to Their Surface Charge Density

Overview
Journal Toxics
Date 2021 Sep 26
PMID 34564361
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

This study aimed at discriminating with sensitivity the toxicological effects of carbon dots (CDs) with various zeta potential (ζ) and charge density (Q) in different cellular models of the human respiratory tract. One anionic and three cationic CDs were synthetized as follows: CD-COOH (ζ = -43.3 mV); CD-PEI600 (Q = 4.70 µmol/mg; ζ = +31.8 mV); CD-PEHA (Q = 3.30 µmol/mg; ζ = +29.2 mV) and CD-DMEDA (Q = 0.01 µmol/mg; ζ = +11.1 mV). Epithelial cells (A549) and macrophages (THP-1) were seeded alone or as co-cultures with different A549:THP-1 ratios. The obtained models were characterized, and multiple biological responses evoked by CDs were assessed in the mono-cultures and the best co-culture model. With 14% macrophages, the 2:1 ratio co-culture best mimicked the in vivo conditions and responded to lipopolysaccharides. The anionic CD did not induce any effect in the mono-cultures nor in the co-culture. Among the cationic CDs, the one with the highest charge density (CD-PEI600) induced the most pronounced responses whatever the culture model. The cationic CDs of low charge density (CD-PEHA and CD-DMEDA) evoked similar responses in the mono-cultures, whereas in the co-culture, the three cationic CDs ranked according to their charge density (CD-PEI600 > CD-PEHA > CD-DMEDA), when taking into account their inflammatory effect. Thus, the co-culture system developed in this study appears to be a sensitive model for finely discriminating the toxicological profile of cationic nanoparticles differing by the density of their surface charges.

Citing Articles

Selective toxicity of a novel antimicrobial peptide Acidocin 4356 against Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter baumannii in human cell-based in vitro infection models.

Talaee M, Modiri S, Rajabi M, Saadati F, Akbari A, Javadi S Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):2450.

PMID: 39828811 PMC: 11743754. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-86115-7.


Fate of engineered nanomaterials at the human epithelial lung tissue barrier after single and repeated exposures.

Lehner R, Zanoni I, Banuscher A, Costa A, Rothen-Rutishauser B Front Toxicol. 2022; 4:918633.

PMID: 36185318 PMC: 9524228. DOI: 10.3389/ftox.2022.918633.

References
1.
Kose O, Tomatis M, Leclerc L, Belblidia N, Hochepied J, Turci F . Impact of the Physicochemical Features of TiO Nanoparticles on Their Toxicity. Chem Res Toxicol. 2020; 33(9):2324-2337. DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemrestox.0c00106. View

2.
Jang J, Seo J, Oh J, Kim J, Kim E, Kim J . and anti-inflammatory activities of mixed fruit and vegetable juice. Food Sci Biotechnol. 2018; 25(3):905-909. PMC: 6049172. DOI: 10.1007/s10068-016-0148-x. View

3.
Clift M, Gehr P, Rothen-Rutishauser B . Nanotoxicology: a perspective and discussion of whether or not in vitro testing is a valid alternative. Arch Toxicol. 2010; 85(7):723-31. DOI: 10.1007/s00204-010-0560-6. View

4.
Huhn D, Kantner K, Geidel C, Brandholt S, De Cock I, Soenen S . Polymer-coated nanoparticles interacting with proteins and cells: focusing on the sign of the net charge. ACS Nano. 2013; 7(4):3253-63. DOI: 10.1021/nn3059295. View

5.
Mahmoudi M, Lynch I, Ejtehadi M, Monopoli M, Bombelli F, Laurent S . Protein-nanoparticle interactions: opportunities and challenges. Chem Rev. 2011; 111(9):5610-37. DOI: 10.1021/cr100440g. View