» Articles » PMID: 34562882

Auditory Processing Disorder Test Battery in European Portuguese-Development and Normative Data for Pediatric Population

Overview
Journal Audiol Res
Publisher MDPI
Date 2021 Sep 25
PMID 34562882
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

There is an increasing need for state-of-the-art Central Auditory Processing assessment for Portuguese native speakers, applicable as early as possible. As a contribution to answering this need, this paper presents a new battery for Central Auditory Processing assessment for European Portuguese applicable to children aged 5 and above, named BAPA-PE, providing information regarding test selection and development. The battery consists of six behavioral tests: Staggered Spondaic Words (SSW) for European Portuguese, Filtered Speech, Speech in Noise, Detection Interval in Noise, Duration, and Frequency Pattern. The normative data for children aged 5 to 12 are also reported. A sample was obtained of 217 subjects without ear pathology and with typical development. Each age group was composed of at least 30 children. All children were evaluated using pure tone audiometry, speech audiometry, impedance, and otoacoustic emissions. Normative scores are reported for each of the six auditory processing tests. The assessment is applicable to young children (aged 5 and 6). The statistical analyses showed significant effects in scores of Age for all tests and of Ear for several tests. The main result from the work presented, the Auditory Processing Assessment Battery-European Portuguese (BAPA-PE), is available for clinical use with normative data. This battery is a new tool for behaviorism assessment of European Portuguese speakers with suspected central auditory pathology and for monitoring the results of auditory training.

Citing Articles

Tracking Listening Skill Development in Infants and Children with Hearing Loss: A Normative Dataset for the Functional Listening Index-Paediatric (FLI-P).

Cowan R, Davis A, Watkins P, Neal K, Brookman R, Seeto M Children (Basel). 2024; 11(9).

PMID: 39334586 PMC: 11430661. DOI: 10.3390/children11091052.


Evidence of validity and reliability of the Compressed Speech Test with Figures.

Sanguebuche T, Pagliarin K, Peixe B, Moraes D, Garcia M Codas. 2024; 36(2):e20230065.

PMID: 38537026 PMC: 10984583. DOI: 10.1590/2317-1782/20232023065pt.


Children then, adults now: long-term outcomes-performance at 15, 20, and 25 years of cochlear implant use.

Moura J, Martins J, Alves M, Oliveira G, Ramos D, Alves H Front Rehabil Sci. 2024; 4:1275808.

PMID: 38170021 PMC: 10760633. DOI: 10.3389/fresc.2023.1275808.


Analysis of the auditory processing skills in 1,012 children aged 6-9 confirms the adequacy of APD testing in 6-year-olds.

Guzek A, Iwanicka-Pronicka K PLoS One. 2022; 17(8):e0272723.

PMID: 35980890 PMC: 9387814. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0272723.

References
1.
Neijenhuis K, Snik A, Priester G, van Kordenoordt S, van den Broek P . Age effects and normative data on a Dutch test battery for auditory processing disorders. Int J Audiol. 2002; 41(6):334-46. DOI: 10.3109/14992020209090408. View

2.
Domitz D, Schow R . A new CAPD battery--multiple auditory processing assessment: factor analysis and comparisons with SCAN. Am J Audiol. 2001; 9(2):101-11. DOI: 10.1044/1059-0889(2000/012). View

3.
Pedersen E, Dahl-Hansen B, Christensen-Dalsgaard J, Brandt C . Implementation and evaluation of a Danish test battery for auditory processing disorder in children. Int J Audiol. 2017; 56(8):538-549. DOI: 10.1080/14992027.2017.1309467. View

4.
Iliadou V, Ptok M, Grech H, Pedersen E, Brechmann A, Deggouj N . A European Perspective on Auditory Processing Disorder-Current Knowledge and Future Research Focus. Front Neurol. 2017; 8:622. PMC: 5702335. DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2017.00622. View

5.
Shinn J, Chermak G, Musiek F . GIN (Gaps-In-Noise) performance in the pediatric population. J Am Acad Audiol. 2009; 20(4):229-38. DOI: 10.3766/jaaa.20.4.3. View