» Articles » PMID: 24447685

Validation of the Screening Test for Auditory Processing (STAP) on School-aged Children

Overview
Specialty Pediatrics
Date 2014 Jan 23
PMID 24447685
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: The present study focussed on validating the Screening Test for Auditory Processing (STAP) that contains four subsections: speech-in-noise, dichotic consonant vowel, gap detection and auditory memory. The sensitivity and specificity were ascertained by comparing the results of the screening test with that of diagnostic tests for auditory processing.

Methods: The STAP was administered on 500 school going children in the age range of 8-13 years. These consisted of 141 children who were found at-risk on the Screening Checklist for Auditory Processing (SCAP). Diagnostic APD tests (speech-in-noise, dichotic CV, gap detection and auditory memory) were administered on 152 of the children referred and/or passed on the screening procedures.

Results: The results from the STAP indicated that the auditory memory subsection of the STAP was the most affected followed by dichotic CV and speech-in-noise. Gap detection was the least affected among the four subsections. A high and significant correlation was noted between the subsections of the STAP and the APD diagnostic tests. The sensitivity and specificity of the STAP on comparison with the diagnostic tests was found to be 76.6% and 72%, respectively. It was found that when a combination of SCAP and STAP was used for screening, the sensitivity and specificity were higher.

Conclusion: Based on the findings of the study, it is recommended that both SCAP and STAP be administered. Further, there was also a good test-retest reliability of the SCAP, STAP and the APD diagnostic tests.

Citing Articles

Practice Trends in (C)APD Assessment and Management: A Survey of Audiologists in Kerala.

Swetha M, Malik M, Mathews M Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2024; 76(5):4285-4291.

PMID: 39376354 PMC: 11456008. DOI: 10.1007/s12070-024-04838-x.


A Survey on Screening and Diagnostic Criteria of Auditory Processing Disorders in India.

Kumar S, Jain C Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2024; 76(1):288-297.

PMID: 38440523 PMC: 10909056. DOI: 10.1007/s12070-023-04146-w.


Effect of an Auditory Temporal Training Program on Speech Fluency of Children with Developmental Stuttering.

Farazi M, Dastgerdi Z, Lotfi Y, Moossavi A, Bakhshi E Iran J Child Neurol. 2023; 17(1):39-53.

PMID: 36721835 PMC: 9881827. DOI: 10.22037/ijcn.v17i1.35885.


AudBility: test-retest reliability in typically developing children aged 6 to 7 years.

Tanaka T, Carvalho N, Colella-Santos M, Amaral M Codas. 2022; 34(6):e20210219.

PMID: 35894308 PMC: 9886299. DOI: 10.1590/2317-1782/20212021219pt.


Auditory Processing Disorder Test Battery in European Portuguese-Development and Normative Data for Pediatric Population.

Martins J, Alves M, Andrade S, Fale I, Teixeira A Audiol Res. 2021; 11(3):474-490.

PMID: 34562882 PMC: 8482123. DOI: 10.3390/audiolres11030044.