» Articles » PMID: 34552043

A Review of the Role of the S-Detect Computer-Aided Diagnostic Ultrasound System in the Evaluation of Benign and Malignant Breast and Thyroid Masses

Overview
Journal Med Sci Monit
Date 2021 Sep 23
PMID 34552043
Citations 14
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) systems have attracted extensive attention owing to their performance in the field of image diagnosis and are rapidly becoming a promising auxiliary tool in medical imaging tasks. These systems can quantitatively evaluate complex medical imaging features and achieve efficient and high-diagnostic accuracy. Deep learning is a representation learning method. As a major branch of artificial intelligence technology, it can directly process original image data by simulating the structure of the human brain neural network, thus independently completing the task of image recognition. S-Detect is a novel and interactive CAD system based on a deep learning algorithm, which has been integrated into ultrasound equipment and can help radiologists identify benign and malignant nodules, reduce physician workload, and optimize the ultrasound clinical workflow. S-Detect is becoming one of the most commonly used CAD systems for ultrasound evaluation of breast and thyroid nodules. In this review, we describe the S-Detect workflow and outline its application in breast and thyroid nodule detection. Finally, we discuss the difficulties and challenges faced by S-Detect as a precision medical tool in clinical practice and its prospects.

Citing Articles

Application of an artificial intelligence-assisted diagnostic system for breast ultrasound: a prospective study.

Jin Z, Li J, Niu R, Fu N, Jiang Y, Li S Gland Surg. 2025; 13(12):2221-2231.

PMID: 39822361 PMC: 11733640. DOI: 10.21037/gs-24-213.


Artificial Intelligence in Diagnostic Breast Ultrasound: A Comparative Analysis of Decision Support Among Radiologists With Various Levels of Expertise.

Celebi F, Tuncer O, Oral M, Duymaz T, Orhan T, Ertas G Eur J Breast Health. 2025; 21(1):33-39.

PMID: 39744891 PMC: 11706116. DOI: 10.4274/ejbh.galenos.2024.2024-9-7.


Application of computer-aided diagnosis to predict malignancy in BI-RADS 3 breast lesions.

He P, Chen W, Bai M, Li J, Wang Q, Fan L Heliyon. 2024; 10(2):e24560.

PMID: 38304808 PMC: 10831749. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e24560.


Comparison of artificial intelligence, elastic imaging, and the thyroid imaging reporting and data system in the differential diagnosis of suspicious nodules.

Cong P, Wang X, Zhang Y Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2024; 14(1):711-721.

PMID: 38223033 PMC: 10784040. DOI: 10.21037/qims-23-788.


Artificial intelligence in breast ultrasound: application in clinical practice.

Fruchtman Brot H, Mango V Ultrasonography. 2023; 43(1):3-14.

PMID: 38109894 PMC: 10766882. DOI: 10.14366/usg.23116.


References
1.
Shen J, Zhang C, Jiang B, Chen J, Song J, Liu Z . Artificial Intelligence Versus Clinicians in Disease Diagnosis: Systematic Review. JMIR Med Inform. 2019; 7(3):e10010. PMC: 6716335. DOI: 10.2196/10010. View

2.
Ko S, Kim E, Sung J, Moon H, Kwak J . Diagnostic performance of ultrasound and ultrasound elastography with respect to physician experience. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2013; 40(5):854-63. DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2013.10.005. View

3.
Yoon J, Kim M, Moon H, Kwak J, Kim E . Subcategorization of ultrasonographic BI-RADS category 4: positive predictive value and clinical factors affecting it. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2011; 37(5):693-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2011.02.009. View

4.
Wu G, Zhou L, Xu J, Wang J, Wei Q, Deng Y . Artificial intelligence in breast ultrasound. World J Radiol. 2019; 11(2):19-26. PMC: 6403465. DOI: 10.4329/wjr.v11.i2.19. View

5.
Cheng J, Chou Y, Huang C, Chang Y, Tiu C, Chen K . Computer-aided US diagnosis of breast lesions by using cell-based contour grouping. Radiology. 2010; 255(3):746-54. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.09090001. View