» Articles » PMID: 34543691

Coping Styles Moderate the Relationship Between Perceived Discrimination and Eating Behaviors During the Transition to College

Overview
Journal Appetite
Date 2021 Sep 20
PMID 34543691
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The transition to college is a critical developmental window during which eating behaviors are susceptible to dysregulation. Changes in exposure to discrimination contribute to alterations in eating behaviors, which may be exacerbated or attenuated by coping styles. The present longitudinal study examines whether increases in perceived discrimination predict increases in overeating and decreases in eating well during the transition to college. We expect that adaptive coping styles will buffer against, while maladaptive coping styles will exacerbate, the effects of increases in perceived discrimination on increases in overeating and decreases in eating well. First year students (n = 804) were assessed at two time points: the spring before freshman year (Time 1) and one year later during the spring semester of freshman year (Time 2). Two distinct coping styles emerged from a factor analysis: adaptive (active coping, planning, emotional support, positive reframing, acceptance, instrumental support) and maladaptive coping (denial, venting, self-blame, self-distraction). Increases in perceived discrimination, lower adaptive coping, and higher maladaptive coping had main effects for predicting more overeating at Time 2. Among students who reported increases in perceived discrimination, higher use of adaptive coping was associated with less overeating at Time 2 while higher use of maladaptive coping was associated with more overeating. While adaptive and maladaptive coping styles had main effects on eating well, change in perceived discrimination did not. Neither adaptive nor maladaptive coping styles interacted with change in perceived discrimination to predict eating well. Findings inform a gap in the literature about the relationship between discrimination and eating behaviors from a developmental perspective by demonstrating that adaptive and maladaptive coping styles influence the effects of changes in perceived discrimination on overeating during the college transition.

Citing Articles

Are the ways women cope with stressors related to their health behaviors over time?.

Trudel-Fitzgerald C, Smith S, Kubzansky L Ann Behav Med. 2025; 59(1).

PMID: 39912382 PMC: 11799860. DOI: 10.1093/abm/kaaf006.


The chain mediation effects of psychological resilience and active coping style between discrimination perceptions and subjective well being among college students with disability.

Zhou N, Chen Z Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):29790.

PMID: 39616282 PMC: 11608263. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-81702-6.


The relationship between body dissatisfaction, lifestyle, and nutritional status among university students in Southern China.

Hao M, Yang J, Xu S, Yan W, Yu H, Wang Q BMC Psychiatry. 2023; 23(1):705.

PMID: 37777718 PMC: 10543264. DOI: 10.1186/s12888-023-05215-8.

References
1.
Hoggard L, Volpe V, Thomas A, Wallace E, Ellis K . The role of emotional eating in the links between racial discrimination and physical and mental health. J Behav Med. 2019; 42(6):1091-1103. DOI: 10.1007/s10865-019-00044-1. View

2.
Cooper M . Toward a person x situation model of sexual risk-taking behaviors: illuminating the conditional effects of traits across sexual situations and relationship contexts. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2010; 98(2):319-41. DOI: 10.1037/a0017785. View

3.
Brondolo E, Brady Ver Halen N, Pencille M, Beatty D, Contrada R . Coping with racism: a selective review of the literature and a theoretical and methodological critique. J Behav Med. 2009; 32(1):64-88. PMC: 3258496. DOI: 10.1007/s10865-008-9193-0. View

4.
Norton M, Sommers S . Whites See Racism as a Zero-Sum Game That They Are Now Losing. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2015; 6(3):215-8. DOI: 10.1177/1745691611406922. View

5.
Baron R, Kenny D . The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1986; 51(6):1173-82. DOI: 10.1037//0022-3514.51.6.1173. View