» Articles » PMID: 34540549

Feasibility of Resection and Plication "RAP" Technique for Management of Medically Refractory GERD in Patients with Altered Gastric Anatomy

Overview
Journal Endosc Int Open
Specialty Gastroenterology
Date 2021 Sep 20
PMID 34540549
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is common, especially in patients after gastric surgery. Medical management of GERD is ineffective in up to 30 % patients and revisional gastric surgery for management of GERD is associated with higher morbidity. We aimed to assess the safety, feasibility, and efficacy of a novel endoscopic resection and plication (RAP) anti-reflux procedure for management of medically refractory GERD in patients with altered gastric anatomy. The RAP procedure involves endoscopic mucosal resection and full-thickness plication over the right posterior-medial axis extending 15 mm above and 20 to 30 mm below the squamocolumnar junction. Adverse events, technical feasibility, GERD health-related quality-of-life (GERD-HRQL) scores, and medication use were prospectively recorded. Twenty consecutive patients with previous gastric surgery underwent RAP between September 2018 and August 2020 with a median follow-up of 5.7 months. The median procedure duration was 66 minutes (IQR 53.8-89.5). RAP was technically successful in 19 patients. One patient developed gastric hemorrhage from suture dehiscence, which was managed endoscopically, and four patients developed esophageal stricture requiring endoscopic dilation. Following the RAP procedure, significant improvement in GERD-HRQL score was observed (mean 26.9, 95 %CI 23.36-30.55,  < 0.01). Fourteen of 19 patients reported > 50 % improvement in GERD-HRQL scores. Sixteen of 18 patients reported reduction in requirement for or cessation of antacid therapy. Patients with refractory GERD after gastric surgery have limited therapeutic options. We have demonstrated that the RAP procedure is feasible, safe, and clinically effective at short-term follow-up. It provides a potential alternative to revisional surgery in patients with altered gastric anatomy.

Citing Articles

American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy guideline on the diagnosis and management of GERD: methodology and review of evidence.

Desai M, Ruan W, Thosani N, Amaris M, Scott J, Saeed A VideoGIE. 2025; 10(2):81-137.

PMID: 40012897 PMC: 11852708. DOI: 10.1016/j.vgie.2024.10.001.


Bariatric surgery and relevant comorbidities: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Wunker C, Kumar S, Hallowell P, Collings A, Loss L, Bansal V Surg Endosc. 2025; 39(3):1419-1448.

PMID: 39920373 PMC: 11870965. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-025-11528-4.

References
1.
McCarty T, Itidiare M, Njei B, Rustagi T . Efficacy of transoral incisionless fundoplication for refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Endoscopy. 2018; 50(7):708-725. DOI: 10.1055/a-0576-6589. View

2.
Buchwald H, Oien D . Metabolic/bariatric surgery worldwide 2011. Obes Surg. 2013; 23(4):427-36. DOI: 10.1007/s11695-012-0864-0. View

3.
Cotton P, Eisen G, Aabakken L, Baron T, Hutter M, Jacobson B . A lexicon for endoscopic adverse events: report of an ASGE workshop. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010; 71(3):446-54. DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2009.10.027. View

4.
Inoue H, Ito H, Ikeda H, Sato C, Sato H, Phalanusitthepha C . Anti-reflux mucosectomy for gastroesophageal reflux disease in the absence of hiatus hernia: a pilot study. Ann Gastroenterol. 2014; 27(4):346-351. PMC: 4188931. View

5.
Kirchheiner J, Glatt S, Fuhr U, Klotz U, Meineke I, Seufferlein T . Relative potency of proton-pump inhibitors-comparison of effects on intragastric pH. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2008; 65(1):19-31. DOI: 10.1007/s00228-008-0576-5. View