» Articles » PMID: 12949712

Improvement of Gastroesophageal Reflux Symptoms After Radiofrequency Energy: a Randomized, Sham-controlled Trial

Overview
Specialty Gastroenterology
Date 2003 Sep 2
PMID 12949712
Citations 83
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background & Aims: Gastroesophageal reflux disease is a prevalent disorder that often requires long-term medical therapy or surgery. The United States Food and Drug Administration recently cleared new endoluminal gastroesophageal reflux disease treatments; however, no controlled trials exist.

Methods: We randomly assigned 64 gastroesophageal reflux disease patients to radiofrequency energy delivery to the gastroesophageal junction (35 patients) or to a sham procedure (29 patients). Principal outcomes were reflux symptoms and quality of life. Secondary outcomes were medication use and esophageal acid exposure. After 6 months, interested sham patients crossed over to active treatment.

Results: At 6 months, active treatment significantly and substantially improved patients' heartburn symptoms and quality of life. More active vs. sham patients were without daily heartburn symptoms (n = 19 [61%] vs. n = 7 [33%]; P = 0.05), and more had a >50% improvement in their gastroesophageal reflux disease quality of life score (n = 19 [61%] vs. n = 6 [30%]; P = 0.03). Symptom improvements persisted at 12 months after treatment. At 6 months, there were no differences in daily medication use after a medication withdrawal protocol (n = 17 [55%] vs. n = 14 [61%]; P = 0.67) or in esophageal acid exposure times. There were no perforations or deaths.

Conclusions: Radiofrequency energy delivery significantly improved gastroesophageal reflux disease symptoms and quality of life compared with a sham procedure, but it did not decrease esophageal acid exposure or medication use at 6 months. This procedure represents a new option for selected symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux disease patients who are intolerant of, or desire an alternative to, traditional medical therapies.

Citing Articles

American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy guideline on the diagnosis and management of GERD: methodology and review of evidence.

Desai M, Ruan W, Thosani N, Amaris M, Scott J, Saeed A VideoGIE. 2025; 10(2):81-137.

PMID: 40012897 PMC: 11852708. DOI: 10.1016/j.vgie.2024.10.001.


New Approaches and Old Struggles in Antireflux Endoscopy.

Kumta N Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y). 2025; 21(1):69-71.

PMID: 39897338 PMC: 11784566.


Therapeutic Management of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD)-Is There Something Between PPI and Fundoplication? An Overview.

Rosen H, Sebesta Jr C, Sebesta M, Sebesta C J Clin Med. 2025; 14(2).

PMID: 39860368 PMC: 11766380. DOI: 10.3390/jcm14020362.


Network meta-analysis of the efficacy of endoscopic cardia peripheral tissue scar formation (ECSF) in the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Shi C, Zhou S, Chen X, Shen D, Wang T, ZhuoMa G PLoS One. 2024; 19(12):e0311208.

PMID: 39739987 PMC: 11687871. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0311208.


Endoscopic Advances in the Diagnosis and Management of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease.

Loganathan P, Gajendran M, Perisetti A, Goyal H, Mann R, Wright R Medicina (Kaunas). 2024; 60(7).

PMID: 39064549 PMC: 11278532. DOI: 10.3390/medicina60071120.