» Articles » PMID: 34540288

Clinical Outcomes of Combined Implantation of an Extended Depth of Focus IOL and a Trifocal IOL in a Korean Population

Overview
Journal J Ophthalmol
Publisher Wiley
Specialty Ophthalmology
Date 2021 Sep 20
PMID 34540288
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate monocular and binocular visual performance and patient-reported outcomes following combined implantation of a diffractive extended depth of focus (EDoF) IOL (Carl Zeiss AT LARA 829MP) and a diffractive trifocal IOL (Carl Zeiss AT LISA tri 839MP).

Methods: This prospective study enrolled consecutive patients undergoing lens phacoemulsification of cataract and combined implantation of an EDoF IOL in the dominant eye and a trifocal IOL in the nondominant eye. Assessment included uncorrected visual acuity at near distances (UNVA), intermediate distances (UIVA), and far distances (UDVA), uncorrected defocus curve, contrast sensitivity (CS), reading speed, and patient satisfaction, evaluated six months after the surgery with the Visual Function Questionnaire (VFQ-25).

Results: A total of 25 patients were enrolled. At six months postoperatively, outcomes of binocular UNVA, UIVA, and UDVA were superior to those of monocular outcomes. The binocular defocus curve showed significantly better results in comparison with the AT LISA tri IOL eyes at defocus levels of -1.0 D and -1.5 D (=0.008 and =0.002, respectively) and compared to the AT LARA IOL eyes at defocus levels of -3.0, -3.5 D, and -4.0 D (=0.019, =0.019, and =0.035, respectively). All of the patients were spectacle-free at far and intermediate distances, while 4% of patients needed spectacles at the near distance. Reading speed showed a rather high and gentle slope curve between 0.1 logMAR and 0.4 logMAR, and optical phenomena were improved after combined implantation of IOLs except halos. There were no significant differences in CS between the binocular and monocular results of each IOL.

Conclusions: The combined implantation of an EDoF IOL and a trifocal IOL seems to be a good option for patients with demands for spectacle independence in their daily life, with minimal photic phenomena.

Citing Articles

Visual performance and patient preference with bilateral implantation of an extended depth of focus or combined implantation of an extended depth of focus/trifocal intraocular lens.

Moore J, Ostergaard J, Kretz F Int Ophthalmol. 2024; 44(1):80.

PMID: 38356027 PMC: 10866775. DOI: 10.1007/s10792-024-03030-y.


Defocus Curve and Satisfaction of Patients with Presbyopia After LASIK Using the Differential Modulation of Binocular Longitudinal Spherical Aberration.

Zhang J, Shao J, Cao X, Zhang Y, Zheng L Clin Ophthalmol. 2023; 17:3531-3542.

PMID: 38026604 PMC: 10676107. DOI: 10.2147/OPTH.S437324.


Clinical prospective intra-individual comparison after mix-and-match implantation of a monofocal EDOF and a diffractive trifocal IOL.

Danzinger V, Schartmuller D, Schwarzenbacher L, Roggla V, Abela-Formanek C, Menapace R Eye (Lond). 2023; 38(2):321-327.

PMID: 37524833 PMC: 10811191. DOI: 10.1038/s41433-023-02682-x.


Clinical outcomes of bilateral implantation of new generation monofocal IOL enhanced for intermediate distance and conventional monofocal IOL in a Korean population.

Choi W, Han H, Son H, Khoramnia R, Auffarth G, Choi C BMC Ophthalmol. 2023; 23(1):157.

PMID: 37069559 PMC: 10108453. DOI: 10.1186/s12886-023-02897-2.


Visual Performance, Satisfaction, and Spectacle Independence after Implantation of a New Hydrophobic Trifocal Intraocular Lens.

Cano-Ortiz A, Sanchez-Ventosa A, Gonzalez-Cruces T, Cerdan-Palacios D, Diaz-Mesa V, Gallego-Ordonez R J Clin Med. 2022; 11(19).

PMID: 36233798 PMC: 9573246. DOI: 10.3390/jcm11195931.

References
1.
Akman A, Asena L, Ozturk C, Gur Gungor S . Evaluation of quality of life after implantation of a new trifocal intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2019; 45(2):130-134. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2018.12.003. View

2.
Radner W, Obermayer W, Richter-Mueksch S, Willinger U, Velikay-Parel M, Eisenwort B . The validity and reliability of short German sentences for measuring reading speed. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2002; 240(6):461-7. DOI: 10.1007/s00417-002-0443-5. View

3.
Black S . A clinical assessment of visual performance of combining the TECNIS Symfony Extended Range of Vision IOL (ZXR00) with the +3.25 D TECNIS Multifocal 1-piece IOL (ZLB00) in subjects undergoing bilateral cataract extraction. Clin Ophthalmol. 2018; 12:2129-2136. PMC: 6205142. DOI: 10.2147/OPTH.S175901. View

4.
Son H, Tandogan T, Liebing S, Merz P, Choi C, Khoramnia R . In vitro optical quality measurements of three intraocular lens models having identical platform. BMC Ophthalmol. 2017; 17(1):108. PMC: 5492950. DOI: 10.1186/s12886-017-0460-0. View

5.
Vilar C, Hida W, de Medeiros A, Magalhaes K, Tzelikis P, Chaves M . Comparison between bilateral implantation of a trifocal intraocular lens and blended implantation of two bifocal intraocular lenses. Clin Ophthalmol. 2017; 11:1393-1397. PMC: 5546829. DOI: 10.2147/OPTH.S139909. View