» Articles » PMID: 30612749

Evaluation of Quality of Life After Implantation of a New Trifocal Intraocular lens

Overview
Specialty Ophthalmology
Date 2019 Jan 8
PMID 30612749
Citations 15
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the vision-related quality of life (QOL) after implantation of a new trifocal intraocular lens (IOL), by using the National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire-14 (VF-14 QOL questionnaire).

Setting: Baskent University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Ophthalmology, Ankara, Turkey.

Design: Prospective noncomparative case series.

Methods: Consecutive patients who had a new trifocal IOL (PanOptix) bilaterally implanted were included in the study. The vision-related QOL was assessed 3 months after the surgery in the second eye. The VF-14 QOL questionnaire was used, with a grading scale of 0, no difficulty; 1, a little difficulty; 2, moderate difficulty; 3, quite difficult; 4, impossible to perform. A subgroup of 14 patients, with an interval of at least 3 months between the surgery in the first eye and the surgery in the fellow eye, were also interviewed 3 months after the monocular IOL implantation. In this subgroup, the QOL with monocular and binocular implantation was compared.

Results: The study comprised 48 patients. Reading small print, driving at night, and doing fine handwork were the most difficult tasks to perform, with the mean values of the VF-14 QOL questionnaire being 0.94 ± 0.81 (SD), 0.89 ± 0.68, and 0.64 ± 0.67, respectively. Binocular implantation was associated with improvement in vision-related QOL when compared with monocular implantation, with significant differences in doing fine handwork such as sewing (P = .02) and using a computer (P = .03).

Conclusions: With mean values of 1.00 or lower for each question, the results of the VF-14 QOL questionnaire indicated that patients who have the new trifocal IOL bilaterally implanted have an overall high satisfaction rate and a high vision-related QOL.

Citing Articles

A survey of intraocular lens preferences of UK refractive surgeons for cataract surgery and refractive lens exchange.

Kabbani J, Price L, Patel R, Din N, Bizrah M BMC Ophthalmol. 2024; 24(1):397.

PMID: 39243067 PMC: 11378387. DOI: 10.1186/s12886-024-03639-8.


Visual Function After Implantation of Trifocal and Trifocal Toric Intraocular Lenses Using Intraoperative Aberrometry.

Brissette A, Cole B, Hall B Clin Ophthalmol. 2024; 18:1547-1554.

PMID: 38832075 PMC: 11146617. DOI: 10.2147/OPTH.S450979.


Comparison of visual performance between diffractive bifocal and diffractive trifocal intraocular lenses.

Kawamura J, Tanabe H, Shojo T, Yamauchi T, Takase K, Tabuchi H Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):5292.

PMID: 38438495 PMC: 10912743. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-55926-5.


Outcomes after bilateral implantation of AcrySof IQ PanOptix trifocal intraocular lens: a prospective interventional study.

Sahin V, Unal M, Ayaz Y Med Hypothesis Discov Innov Ophthalmol. 2023; 12(1):36-45.

PMID: 37641668 PMC: 10445311. DOI: 10.51329/mehdiophthal1468.


The Impact of Angle Lambda on Patient Satisfaction after Optiflex Trio Trifocal Intraocular Lens Implantation.

Kaya Unsal S, Sunay E J Ophthalmol. 2023; 2023:7911449.

PMID: 37362312 PMC: 10290561. DOI: 10.1155/2023/7911449.