» Articles » PMID: 34525943

Biomarkers for Autism Spectrum Disorder: Opportunities for Magnetoencephalography (MEG)

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialties Neurology
Psychiatry
Date 2021 Sep 16
PMID 34525943
Citations 15
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

This paper reviews a candidate biomarker for ASD, the M50 auditory evoked response component, detected by magnetoencephalography (MEG) and presents a position on the roles and opportunities for such a biomarker, as well as converging evidence from allied imaging techniques (magnetic resonance imaging, MRI and spectroscopy, MRS). Data is presented on prolonged M50 latencies in ASD as well as extension to include children with ASD with significant language and cognitive impairments in whom M50 latency delays are exacerbated. Modeling of the M50 latency by consideration of the properties of auditory pathway white matter is shown to be successful in typical development but challenged by heterogeneity in ASD; this, however, is capitalized upon to identify a distinct subpopulation of children with ASD whose M50 latencies lie well outside the range of values predictable from the typically developing model. Interestingly, this subpopulation is characterized by low levels of the inhibitory neurotransmitter GABA. Following from this, we discuss a potential use of the M50 latency in indicating "target engagement" acutely with administration of a GABA-B agonist, potentially distinguishing "responders" from "non-responders" with the implication of optimizing inclusion for clinical trials of such agents. Implications for future application, including potential evaluation of infants with genetic risk factors, are discussed. As such, the broad scope of potential of a representative candidate biological marker, the M50 latency, is introduced along with potential future applications.This paper outlines a strategy for understanding brain dysfunction in individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD). It is proposed that a multimodal approach (collection of brain structure, chemistry, and neuronal functional data) will identify IDD subpopulations who share a common disease pathway, and thus identify individuals with IDD who might ultimately benefit from specific treatments. After briefly demonstrating the need and potential for scope, examples from studies examining brain function and structure in children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) illustrate how measures of brain neuronal function (from magnetoencephalography, MEG), brain structure (from magnetic resonance imaging, MRI, especially diffusion MRI), and brain chemistry (MR spectroscopy) can help us better understand the heterogeneity in ASD and form the basis of multivariate biological markers (biomarkers) useable to define clinical subpopulations. Similar approaches can be applied to understand brain dysfunction in neurodevelopmental disorders (NDD) in general. In large part, this paper represents our endeavors as part of the CHOP/Penn NICHD-funded intellectual and developmental disabilities research center (IDDRC) over the past decade.

Citing Articles

Interest paradigm for early identification of autism spectrum disorder: an analysis from electroencephalography combined with eye tracking.

Sun B, Calvert E, Ye A, Mao H, Liu K, Wang R Front Neurosci. 2024; 18:1502045.

PMID: 39664447 PMC: 11631861. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2024.1502045.


Magnetoencephalography in Psychiatry: A Perspective on Translational Research and Applications.

Tavella A, Uhlhaas P Adv Neurobiol. 2024; 40:143-156.

PMID: 39562444 DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-69491-2_6.


Paediatric magnetoencephalography and its role in neurodevelopmental disorders.

Rhodes N, Sato J, Safar K, Amorim K, Taylor M, Brookes M Br J Radiol. 2024; 97(1162):1591-1601.

PMID: 38976633 PMC: 11417392. DOI: 10.1093/bjr/tqae123.


Magnetoencephalography for the pediatric population, indications, acquisition and interpretation for the clinician.

Dmytriw A, Hadjinicolaou A, Ntolkeras G, Tamilia E, Pesce M, Berto L Neuroradiol J. 2024; 38(1):7-20.

PMID: 38864180 PMC: 11571317. DOI: 10.1177/19714009241260801.


From bench to bedside: Overview of magnetoencephalography in basic principle, signal processing, source localization and clinical applications.

Yang Y, Luo S, Wang W, Gao X, Yao X, Wu T Neuroimage Clin. 2024; 42:103608.

PMID: 38653131 PMC: 11059345. DOI: 10.1016/j.nicl.2024.103608.


References
1.
Musacchia G, Choudhury N, Ortiz-Mantilla S, Realpe-Bonilla T, Roesler C, Benasich A . Oscillatory support for rapid frequency change processing in infants. Neuropsychologia. 2013; 51(13):2812-24. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2013.09.006. View

2.
Bloy L, Ku M, Edgar J, Miller J, Blaskey L, Ross J . Auditory evoked response delays in children with 47,XYY syndrome. Neuroreport. 2019; 30(7):504-509. PMC: 6544154. DOI: 10.1097/WNR.0000000000001233. View

3.
Sahin M, Jones S, Sweeney J, Berry-Kravis E, Connors B, Ewen J . Discovering translational biomarkers in neurodevelopmental disorders. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2019; . PMC: 7556736. DOI: 10.1038/d41573-018-00010-7. View

4.
Demopoulos C, Yu N, Tripp J, Mota N, Brandes-Aitken A, Desai S . Magnetoencephalographic Imaging of Auditory and Somatosensory Cortical Responses in Children with Autism and Sensory Processing Dysfunction. Front Hum Neurosci. 2017; 11:259. PMC: 5445128. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2017.00259. View

5.
Jenkins 3rd J, Chow V, Blaskey L, Kuschner E, Qasmieh S, Gaetz L . Auditory Evoked M100 Response Latency is Delayed in Children with 16p11.2 Deletion but not 16p11.2 Duplication. Cereb Cortex. 2015; 26(5):1957-64. PMC: 6276914. DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhv008. View