» Articles » PMID: 24936181

Missing and Delayed Auditory Responses in Young and Older Children with Autism Spectrum Disorders

Overview
Specialty Neurology
Date 2014 Jun 18
PMID 24936181
Citations 35
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The development of left and right superior temporal gyrus (STG) 50 ms (M50) and 100 ms (M100) auditory responses in typically developing (TD) children and in children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) was examined. Reflecting differential development of primary/secondary auditory areas and supporting previous studies, it was hypothesized that whereas left and right M50 STG responses would be observed equally often in younger and older children, left and right M100 STG responses would more often be absent in younger than older children. In ASD, delayed neurodevelopment would be indicated via the observation of a greater proportion of ASD than TD subjects showing missing M100 but not M50 responses in both age groups. Missing M100 responses would be observed primarily in children with ASD with language impairment (ASD + LI) (and perhaps concomitantly lower general cognitive abilities).

Methods: Thirty-five TD controls, 63 ASD without language impairment (ASD - LI), and 38 ASD + LI were recruited. Binaural tones were presented. The presence or absence of a STG M50 and M100 was scored. Subjects were grouped into younger (6-10 years old) and older groups (11-15 years old).

Results: Although M50 responses were observed equally often in older and younger subjects and equally often in TD and ASD, left and right M50 responses were delayed in ASD - LI and ASD + LI. Group comparisons showed that in younger subjects M100 responses were observed more often in TD than ASD + LI (90 versus 66%, p = 0.04), with no differences between TD and ASD - LI (90 versus 76%, p = 0.14) or between ASD - LI and ASD + LI (76 versus 66%, p = 0.53). In older subjects, whereas no differences were observed between TD and ASD + LI, responses were observed more often in ASD - LI than ASD + LI. Findings were similar when splitting the ASD group into lower- and higher-cognitive functioning groups.

Conclusion: Although present in all groups, M50 responses were delayed in ASD. Examining the TD data, findings indicated that by 11 years, a right M100 should be observed in 100% of subjects and a left M100 in 80% of subjects. Thus, by 11 years, lack of a left and especially right M100 offers neurobiological insight into sensory processing that may underlie language or cognitive impairment.

Citing Articles

Magnetoencephalography in Psychiatry: A Perspective on Translational Research and Applications.

Tavella A, Uhlhaas P Adv Neurobiol. 2024; 40:143-156.

PMID: 39562444 DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-69491-2_6.


From bench to bedside: Overview of magnetoencephalography in basic principle, signal processing, source localization and clinical applications.

Yang Y, Luo S, Wang W, Gao X, Yao X, Wu T Neuroimage Clin. 2024; 42:103608.

PMID: 38653131 PMC: 11059345. DOI: 10.1016/j.nicl.2024.103608.


Global MEG Resting State Functional Connectivity in Children with Autism and Sensory Processing Dysfunction.

Demopoulos C, Jesson X, Gerdes M, Jurigova B, Hinkley L, Ranasinghe K bioRxiv. 2024; .

PMID: 38352614 PMC: 10862722. DOI: 10.1101/2024.01.26.577499.


Associations between rapid auditory processing of speech sounds and specific verbal communication skills in autism.

Demopoulos C, Skiba S, Kopald B, Bangera N, Paulson K, Lewine J Front Psychol. 2023; 14:1223250.

PMID: 37663330 PMC: 10470870. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1223250.


Rapid auditory processing of puretones is associated with basic components of language in individuals with autism spectrum disorders.

Demopoulos C, Kopald B, Bangera N, Paulson K, Lewine J Brain Lang. 2023; 238:105229.

PMID: 36753824 PMC: 10029928. DOI: 10.1016/j.bandl.2023.105229.


References
1.
Roberts T, Khan S, Rey M, Monroe J, Cannon K, Blaskey L . MEG detection of delayed auditory evoked responses in autism spectrum disorders: towards an imaging biomarker for autism. Autism Res. 2010; 3(1):8-18. PMC: 3099241. DOI: 10.1002/aur.111. View

2.
Myles-Worsley M, Coon H, Byerley W, Waldo M, Young D, Freedman R . Developmental and genetic influences on the P50 sensory gating phenotype. Biol Psychiatry. 1996; 39(4):289-95. DOI: 10.1016/0006-3223(95)00134-4. View

3.
Ponton C, Eggermont J, Khosla D, Kwong B, Don M . Maturation of human central auditory system activity: separating auditory evoked potentials by dipole source modeling. Clin Neurophysiol. 2002; 113(3):407-20. DOI: 10.1016/s1388-2457(01)00733-7. View

4.
Yoshimura Y, Kikuchi M, Shitamichi K, Ueno S, Remijn G, Haruta Y . Language performance and auditory evoked fields in 2- to 5-year-old children. Eur J Neurosci. 2012; 35(4):644-50. DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2012.07998.x. View

5.
Bruneau N, Roux S, Guerin P, Barthelemy C, LELORD G . Temporal prominence of auditory evoked potentials (N1 wave) in 4-8-year-old children. Psychophysiology. 1997; 34(1):32-8. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1997.tb02413.x. View