» Articles » PMID: 34524944

A MultiCenter Analysis of Factors Associated with Hearing Outcome for 2,735 Adults with Cochlear Implants

Overview
Journal Trends Hear
Date 2021 Sep 15
PMID 34524944
Citations 27
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

While the majority of cochlear implant recipients benefit from the device, it remains difficult to estimate the degree of benefit for a specific patient prior to implantation. Using data from 2,735 cochlear-implant recipients from across three clinics, the largest retrospective study of cochlear-implant outcomes to date, we investigate the association between 21 preoperative factors and speech recognition approximately one year after implantation and explore the consistency of their effects across the three constituent datasets. We provide evidence of 17 statistically significant associations, in either univariate or multivariate analysis, including confirmation of associations for several predictive factors, which have only been examined in prior smaller studies. Despite the large sample size, a multivariate analysis shows that the variance explained by our models remains modest across the datasets (-0.21). Finally, we report a novel statistical interaction indicating that the duration of deafness in the implanted ear has a stronger impact on hearing outcome when considered relative to a candidate's age. Our multicenter study highlights several real-world complexities that impact the clinical translation of predictive factors for cochlear implantation outcome. We suggest several directions to overcome these challenges and further improve our ability to model patient outcomes with increased accuracy.

Citing Articles

Speech outcomes in cochlear implant users depend on visual cross-modal cortical activity measured before or after implantation.

Paul B, Trinh V, Chen J, Le T, Lin V, Dimitrijevic A Brain Commun. 2025; 7(1):fcaf071.

PMID: 40008325 PMC: 11851104. DOI: 10.1093/braincomms/fcaf071.


Utilization of the Spanish Bisyllable Word Recognition Test to Assess Cochlear Implant Performance Trajectory.

Holcomb M, Williams E, Prentiss S, Sanchez C, Smeal M, Stern T J Clin Med. 2025; 14(3).

PMID: 39941445 PMC: 11818614. DOI: 10.3390/jcm14030774.


Determinants of Success in Revision Cochlear Implant Surgeries: A Comprehensive Evaluation of Patient, Surgical, and Radiological Factors.

Alshehri S, Alasmari T Diagnostics (Basel). 2025; 15(2).

PMID: 39857070 PMC: 11765166. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics15020186.


Influence of cochlear coverage on speech perception in single sided deafness, bimodal, and bilateral implanted cochlear implant patients.

Spiegel J, Mueller J, Boehnlein R, Hempel J, Spiro J, Weiss B Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2024; .

PMID: 39681657 DOI: 10.1007/s00405-024-09086-x.


Frequency-to-Place Mismatch and Cochlear Implant Outcomes by Electrode Type.

DeFreese A, Berg K, Noble J, Dawant B, Holder J, Amberg S JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2024; 151(2):135-142.

PMID: 39666319 PMC: 11826361. DOI: 10.1001/jamaoto.2024.4158.


References
1.
Battmer R, Gupta S, Lenarz T . Factors influencing cochlear implant perceptual performance in 132 adults. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl. 1995; 166:185-7. View

2.
Janeschik S, Teschendorf M, Bagus H, Arweiler-Harbeck D . Influence of etiologic factors on speech perception of cochlear-implanted children. Cochlear Implants Int. 2013; 14(4):190-9. DOI: 10.1179/1754762812Y.0000000017. View

3.
Plant K, McDermott H, van Hoesel R, Dawson P, Cowan R . Factors Predicting Postoperative Unilateral and Bilateral Speech Recognition in Adult Cochlear Implant Recipients with Acoustic Hearing. Ear Hear. 2015; 37(2):153-63. DOI: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000233. View

4.
Leigh J, Dettman S, Dowell R . Evidence-based guidelines for recommending cochlear implantation for young children: Audiological criteria and optimizing age at implantation. Int J Audiol. 2016; 55 Suppl 2:S9-S18. DOI: 10.3109/14992027.2016.1157268. View

5.
Medina M, Polo R, Gutierrez A, Muriel A, Vaca M, Perez C . Cochlear Implantation in Postlingual Adult Patients With Long-Term Auditory Deprivation. Otol Neurotol. 2017; 38(8):e248-e252. DOI: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000001257. View