» Articles » PMID: 23044644

The Cochlear Implant: Historical Aspects and Future Prospects

Overview
Date 2012 Oct 10
PMID 23044644
Citations 51
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The cochlear implant (CI) is the first effective treatment for deafness and severe losses in hearing. As such, the CI is now widely regarded as one of the great advances in modern medicine. This article reviews the key events and discoveries that led up to the current CI systems, and we review and present some among the many possibilities for further improvements in device design and performance. The past achievements include: (1) development of reliable devices that can be used over the lifetime of a patient; (2) development of arrays of implanted electrodes that can stimulate more than one site in the cochlea; and (3) progressive and large improvements in sound processing strategies for CIs. In addition, cooperation between research organizations and companies greatly accelerated the widespread availability and use of safe and effective devices. Possibilities for the future include: (1) use of otoprotective drugs; (2) further improvements in electrode designs and placements; (3) further improvements in sound processing strategies; (4) use of stem cells to replace lost sensory hair cells and neural structures in the cochlea; (5) gene therapy; (6) further reductions in the trauma caused by insertions of electrodes and other manipulations during implant surgeries; and (7) optical rather electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve. Each of these possibilities is the subject of active research. Although great progress has been made to date in the development of the CI, including the first substantial restoration of a human sense, much more progress seems likely and certainly would not be a surprise.

Citing Articles

Tympanic Pre-Operative Electrically Evoked Auditory Late Response (TympEALR) as an Alternative to Trans-Tympanic Tests Using Anesthesia in Cochlear Implant Candidacy.

Polterauer D, Neuling M, Simon F J Clin Med. 2025; 13(24.

PMID: 39768495 PMC: 11728447. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13247573.


William F. House: The Father of Neurotology.

Goins J, Mankekar G Cureus. 2024; 16(9):e69724.

PMID: 39429272 PMC: 11490263. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.69724.


Electrocochleography-Based Tonotopic Map: II. Frequency-to-Place Mismatch Impacts Speech-Perception Outcomes in Cochlear Implant Recipients.

Walia A, Shew M, Varghese J, Lefler S, Bhat A, Ortmann A Ear Hear. 2024; 45(6):1406-1417.

PMID: 38880958 PMC: 11493529. DOI: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000001528.


The Chronological Evolution of Cochlear Implant Contraindications: A Comprehensive Review.

Hamed N, Alajmi N, Alkoblan F, Alghtani Y, Abdelsamad Y, Alhussien A J Clin Med. 2024; 13(8).

PMID: 38673610 PMC: 11050773. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13082337.


Balancing Act: A Comprehensive Review of Vestibular Evaluation in Cochlear Implants.

Moreno A, Castillo-Bustamante M, Prieto J Cureus. 2024; 16(2):e55261.

PMID: 38425330 PMC: 10903968. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.55261.


References
1.
Gstoettner W, Helbig S, Settevendemie C, Baumann U, Wagenblast J, Arnoldner C . A new electrode for residual hearing preservation in cochlear implantation: first clinical results. Acta Otolaryngol. 2009; 129(4):372-9. DOI: 10.1080/00016480802552568. View

2.
Roehm P, Hansen M . Strategies to preserve or regenerate spiral ganglion neurons. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2005; 13(5):294-300. DOI: 10.1097/01.moo.0000180919.68812.b9. View

3.
Helbig S, Van de Heyning P, Kiefer J, Baumann U, Kleine-Punte A, Brockmeier H . Combined electric acoustic stimulation with the PULSARCI(100) implant system using the FLEX(EAS) electrode array. Acta Otolaryngol. 2011; 131(6):585-95. DOI: 10.3109/00016489.2010.544327. View

4.
James D, Eastwood H, Richardson R, OLeary S . Effects of round window dexamethasone on residual hearing in a Guinea pig model of cochlear implantation. Audiol Neurootol. 2007; 13(2):86-96. DOI: 10.1159/000111780. View

5.
BILGER R, Black F . Auditory prostheses in perspective. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl. 1977; 86(3 Pt 2 Suppl 38):3-10. DOI: 10.1177/00034894770860s301. View