» Articles » PMID: 34523306

Adoption of the Concept of Person-centred Care into Discourse in Europe: a Systematic Literature Review

Overview
Specialty Health Services
Date 2021 Sep 15
PMID 34523306
Citations 19
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: This study aims to describe how person-centred care, as a concept, has been adopted into discourse in 23 European countries in relation to their healthcare systems (Beveridge, Bismarck, out of pocket).

Design/methodology/approach: A literature review inspired by the SPICE model, using both scientific studies (CINHAL, Medline, Scopus) and grey literature (Google), was conducted. A total of 1,194 documents from CINHAL ( = 139), Medline ( = 245), Scopus ( = 493) and Google ( = 317) were analysed for content and scope of person-centred care in each country. Countries were grouped based on healthcare systems.

Findings: Results from descriptive statistics (percentage, range) revealed that person-centred care was most common in the United Kingdom ( = 481, 40.3%), Sweden ( = 231, 19.3%), the Netherlands ( = 80, 6.7%), Northern Ireland ( = 79, 6.6%) and Norway ( = 61, 5.1%) compared with Poland (0.6%), Hungary (0.5%), Greece (0.4%), Latvia (0.4%) and Serbia (0%). Based on healthcare systems, seven out of ten countries with the Beveridge model used person-centred care backed by scientific literature ( = 999), as opposed to the Bismarck model, which was mostly supported by grey literature ( = 190).

Practical Implications: Adoption of the concept of person-centred care into discourse requires a systematic approach at the national (politicians), regional (guidelines) and local (specific healthcare settings) levels visualised by decision-making to establish a well-integrated phenomenon in Europe.

Social Implications: Evidence-based knowledge as well as national regulations regarding person-centred care are important tools to motivate the adoption of person-centred care in clinical practice. This could be expressed by decision-making at the macro (law, mission) level, which guides the meso (policies) and micro (routines) levels to adopt the scope and content of person-centred care in clinical practice. However, healthcare systems (Beveridge, Bismarck and out-of-pocket) have different structures and missions owing to ethical approaches. The quality of healthcare supported by evidence-based knowledge enables the establishment of a well-integrated phenomenon in European healthcare.

Originality/value: Our findings clarify those countries using the Beveridge healthcare model rank higher on accepting/adopting the concept of person-centered care in discourse. To adopt the concept of person-centred care in discourse requires a systematic approach at all levels in the organisation-from the national (politicians) and regional (guideline) to the local (specific healthcare settings) levels of healthcare.

Citing Articles

European general practitioners' attitudes towards person-centred care and factors that influence its implementation in everyday practice: The protocol of the cross-sectional PACE GP/FP study in 24 European countries.

Petricek G, Klemenc-Ketis Z, Ozvacic Adzic Z, Cerovecki V, Willems S, Tsimtsiou Z Eur J Gen Pract. 2025; 31(1):2463630.

PMID: 40008619 PMC: 11866646. DOI: 10.1080/13814788.2025.2463630.


Participatory research approaches in long-term care facilities for older adults: a meta-ethnography.

Gaber S, Guerrero M, Rosenberg L Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being. 2024; 19(1):2431449.

PMID: 39580815 PMC: 11587718. DOI: 10.1080/17482631.2024.2431449.


Person-centred care, a core concept of family medicine.

Svab I, Cerovecki V Eur J Gen Pract. 2024; 30(1):2393860.

PMID: 39190294 PMC: 11351358. DOI: 10.1080/13814788.2024.2393860.


Evaluating the implementation of person-centred care and simulation-based learning in a midwifery education programme in the Democratic Republic of Congo: a study protocol.

Temple F, Carlsson Lalloo E, Berg M, Berg U, Munyali Desire A, Nyakio O Glob Health Action. 2024; 17(1):2370097.

PMID: 38916612 PMC: 11207909. DOI: 10.1080/16549716.2024.2370097.


Person-centered care assessment tool with a focus on quality healthcare: a systematic review of psychometric properties.

Bru-Luna L, Marti-Vilar M, Merino-Soto C, Livia-Segovia J, Garduno-Espinosa J, Toledano-Toledano F BMC Psychol. 2024; 12(1):217.

PMID: 38641852 PMC: 11031960. DOI: 10.1186/s40359-024-01716-7.


References
1.
Vassbo T, Kirkevold M, Edvardsson D, Sjogren K, Lood Q, Sandman P . Associations between job satisfaction, person-centredness, and ethically difficult situations in nursing homes-A cross-sectional study. J Adv Nurs. 2018; 75(5):979-988. DOI: 10.1111/jan.13890. View

2.
Harter M, Dirmaier J, Scholl I, Donner-Banzhoff N, Dierks M, Eich W . The long way of implementing patient-centered care and shared decision making in Germany. Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2017; 123-124:46-51. DOI: 10.1016/j.zefq.2017.05.006. View

3.
Wranik D . Healthcare policy tools as determinants of health-system efficiency: evidence from the OECD. Health Econ Policy Law. 2011; 7(2):197-226. DOI: 10.1017/S1744133111000211. View

4.
Moore L, Britten N, Lydahl D, Naldemirci O, Elam M, Wolf A . Barriers and facilitators to the implementation of person-centred care in different healthcare contexts. Scand J Caring Sci. 2016; 31(4):662-673. PMC: 5724704. DOI: 10.1111/scs.12376. View

5.
Edvardsson D, Sandman P, Borell L . Implementing national guidelines for person-centered care of people with dementia in residential aged care: effects on perceived person-centeredness, staff strain, and stress of conscience. Int Psychogeriatr. 2014; 26(7):1171-9. DOI: 10.1017/S1041610214000258. View