» Articles » PMID: 28546055

The Long Way of Implementing Patient-centered Care and Shared Decision Making in Germany

Overview
Date 2017 May 27
PMID 28546055
Citations 32
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The main focus of the paper is on the description of the development and current state of research and implementation of patient-centered care (PCC) and shared decision making (SDM) after fifteen years of substantial advances in health policy and health services research. What is the current state of SDM in health policy? The "Patients' Rights Act" from 2013 standardizes all rights and responsibilities within the framework of medical treatment for German citizens and legal residents. This comprises the right to informed decisions, comprehensive and comprehensible information for patients, and decisions based on a clinician-patient-partnership. What is the current state of SDM interventions and patient decision support tools? SDM training programs for healthcare professionals have been developed. Their implementation in medical schools has been successful. Several decision support tools - primarily with support from health insurance funds and other public agencies - are to be implemented in routine care, specifically for national cancer screening programs. What is the current state of research and routine implementation? The German government and other public institutions are constantly funding research programs in which patient-centered care and shared decision-making are important topics. The development and implementation of decision tools for patients and professionals as well as the implementation of CME trainings for healthcare professionals require future efforts. What does the future look like? With the support of health policy and scientific evidence, transfer of PCC and SDM to practice is regarded as meaningful. Research can help to assess barriers, facilitators, and needs, and subsequently to develop and evaluate corresponding strategies to successfully implement PCC and SDM in routine care, which remains challenging.

Citing Articles

[Professional health literacy. Professional and gender-specific aspects].

Griese L, Schaeffer D Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2025; 68(3):282-292.

PMID: 39964442 PMC: 11868220. DOI: 10.1007/s00103-025-04014-8.


Mixed Comparative Evaluation of a Training Program Dedicated to Cystic Fibrosis Reference Centers: Protocol for the Pilot Implementation of Shared Decision-Making in the Treatment of Diabetes in Adult Patients With Cystic Fibrosis.

Moumjid N, Gotte C, Hommey S, Poupon Bourdy S, Haesebaert J, Durieu I JMIR Res Protoc. 2025; 14:e62931.

PMID: 39874570 PMC: 11815300. DOI: 10.2196/62931.


[Dimensions of person-centeredness in abortion services-selected results of the CarePreg study].

Zill J, Lindig A Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2024; 68(1):19-27.

PMID: 39656246 PMC: 11732932. DOI: 10.1007/s00103-024-03990-7.


Patient experiences and needs in cancer care- results from a nationwide cross-sectional study in Germany.

Ziegler E, Klein J, Kofahl C BMC Health Serv Res. 2024; 24(1):572.

PMID: 38698426 PMC: 11067160. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-024-10951-y.


Assessment of relevance and actual implementation of person-centeredness in healthcare and social support services for women with unintended pregnancy in Germany (CarePreg): results of expert workshops.

Lindig A, Heger S, Zill J BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2024; 24(1):247.

PMID: 38582864 PMC: 10998354. DOI: 10.1186/s12884-024-06453-8.