» Articles » PMID: 34521666

Assessing the Safety of Home Oximetry for COVID-19: a Multisite Retrospective Observational Study

Overview
Journal BMJ Open
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2021 Sep 15
PMID 34521666
Citations 19
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: To determine the safety and effectiveness of home oximetry monitoring pathways for patients with COVID-19 in the English National Health Service.

Design: Retrospective, multisite, observational study of home oximetry monitoring for patients with suspected or proven COVID-19.

Setting: This study analysed patient data from four COVID-19 home oximetry pilot sites in England across primary and secondary care settings.

Participants: A total of 1338 participants were enrolled in a home oximetry programme across four pilot sites. Participants were excluded if primary care data and oxygen saturations at rest at enrolment were not available. Data from 908 participants were included in the analysis.

Interventions: Home oximetry monitoring was provided to participants with a known or suspected diagnosis of COVID-19. Participants were enrolled following attendance to emergency departments, hospital admission or referral through primary care services.

Results: Of 908 patients enrolled into four different COVID-19 home oximetry programmes in England, 771 (84.9%) had oxygen saturations at rest of 95% or more, and 320 (35.2%) were under 65 years of age and without comorbidities. 52 (5.7%) presented to hospital and 28 (3.1%) died following enrolment, of which 14 (50%) had COVID-19 as a named cause of death. All-cause mortality was significantly higher in patients enrolled after admission to hospital (OR 8.70 (2.53-29.89)), compared with those enrolled in primary care. Patients enrolled after hospital discharge (OR 0.31 (0.15-0.68)) or emergency department presentation (OR 0.42 (0.20-0.89)) were significantly less likely to present to hospital than those enrolled in primary care.

Conclusions: This study finds that home oximetry monitoring can be a safe pathway for patients with COVID-19; and indicates increases in risk to vulnerable groups and patients with oxygen saturations <95% at enrolment, and in those enrolled on discharge from hospital. Findings from this evaluation have contributed to the national implementation of home oximetry across England.

Citing Articles

Remote Patient Monitoring at Home in Patients With COVID-19: Narrative Review.

Cornelis J, Christiaens W, de Meester C, Mistiaen P JMIR Nurs. 2024; 7:e44580.

PMID: 39287362 PMC: 11615560. DOI: 10.2196/44580.


Feasibility and acceptability of remotely monitoring spirometry and pulse oximetry as part of interstitial lung disease clinical care: a single arm observational study.

Barth S, Edwards C, Saini G, Haider Y, Williams N, Storrar W Respir Res. 2024; 25(1):162.

PMID: 38622608 PMC: 11020645. DOI: 10.1186/s12931-024-02787-1.


Evaluating the Impact of the National Health Service Digital Academy on Participants' Perceptions of Their Identity as Leaders of Digital Health Change: Mixed Methods Study.

Acharya A, Black R, Smithies A, Darzi A JMIR Med Educ. 2024; 10:e46740.

PMID: 38381477 PMC: 10918534. DOI: 10.2196/46740.


Patent and Bibliometric Analysis of the Scientific Landscape of the Use of Pulse Oximeters and Their Prospects in the Field of Digital Medicine.

Litvinova O, Hammerle F, Stoyanov J, Ksepka N, Matin M, Lawinski M Healthcare (Basel). 2023; 11(22).

PMID: 37998496 PMC: 10671755. DOI: 10.3390/healthcare11223003.


Patient perspectives on home-spirometry in interstitial lung disease: a qualitative co-designed study.

Mandizha J, Lanario J, Duckworth A, Lines S, Paiva A, Elworthy V BMJ Open Respir Res. 2023; 10(1).

PMID: 37793682 PMC: 10551997. DOI: 10.1136/bmjresp-2023-001837.


References
1.
Watson A, Wah R, Thamman R . The Value of Remote Monitoring for the COVID-19 Pandemic. Telemed J E Health. 2020; 26(9):1110-1112. DOI: 10.1089/tmj.2020.0134. View

2.
Luks A, Swenson E . Pulse Oximetry for Monitoring Patients with COVID-19 at Home. Potential Pitfalls and Practical Guidance. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2020; 17(9):1040-1046. PMC: 7462317. DOI: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.202005-418FR. View

3.
Guise V, Anderson J, Wiig S . Patient safety risks associated with telecare: a systematic review and narrative synthesis of the literature. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014; 14:588. PMC: 4254014. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-014-0588-z. View

4.
Noah B, Keller M, Mosadeghi S, Stein L, Johl S, Delshad S . Impact of remote patient monitoring on clinical outcomes: an updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. NPJ Digit Med. 2019; 1:20172. PMC: 6550143. DOI: 10.1038/s41746-017-0002-4. View

5.
Jouffroy R, Jost D, Prunet B . Prehospital pulse oximetry: a red flag for early detection of silent hypoxemia in COVID-19 patients. Crit Care. 2020; 24(1):313. PMC: 7278215. DOI: 10.1186/s13054-020-03036-9. View