» Articles » PMID: 34516663

Efficacy of Systemic Therapies in Men with Metastatic Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer Harboring Germline ATM Versus BRCA2 Mutations

Abstract

Background: Among men with metastatic prostate cancer, about 10% have germline alterations in DNA damage response genes. Most studies have examined BRCA2 alone or an aggregate of BRCA1/2 and ATM. Emerging data suggest that ATM mutations may have distinct biology and warrant individual evaluation. The objective of this study is to determine whether response to prostate cancer systemic therapies differs between men with germline mutations in ATM (gATM) and BRCA2 (gBRCA2).

Methods: This is an international multicenter retrospective matched cohort study of men with prostate cancer harboring gATM or gBRCA2. PSA response (≥50% decline in prostate-specific antigen) was compared using Fisher's exact test.

Results And Limitations: The study included 45 gATM and 45 gBRCA2 patients, matched on stage and year of germline testing. Patients with gATM and gBRCA2 had similar age, Gleason grade, and PSA at diagnosis. We did not observe differences in PSA responses to abiraterone, enzalutamide, or docetaxel in metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer between the two groups; however, 0/7 with gATM and 12/14 with gBRCA2 achieved PSA response to PARPi (p < .001). Median (95% confidence interval) overall survival from diagnosis to death was 10.9 years (9.5-not reached) versus 9.9 years (7.1-not reached, p = .07) for the gATM and gBRCA2 cohorts, respectively. Limitations include the retrospective design and lack of mutation zygosity data.

Conclusions: Conventional therapies can be effective in gATM carriers and should be considered before PARPi, which shows limited efficacy in this group. Men with gATM mutations warrant prioritization for novel treatment strategies.

Citing Articles

Positive response to niraparib in chemo-refractory patients with metastatic appendiceal mucinous adenocarcinoma harboring ATM mutations: A case report.

Wang J, He H, Xu W, Chen J Front Oncol. 2023; 13:1010871.

PMID: 36860317 PMC: 9969135. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1010871.


Therapeutic sensitivity to standard treatments in BRCA positive metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer patients-a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Fazekas T, Szeles A, Teutsch B, Csizmarik A, Vekony B, Varadi A Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2022; 26(4):665-672.

PMID: 36509931 PMC: 10638083. DOI: 10.1038/s41391-022-00626-2.


Differential responses to taxanes and PARP inhibitors in ATM- versus BRCA2-mutated metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer.

Su C, Nizialek E, Berchuck J, Vlachostergios P, Ashkar R, Sokolova A Prostate. 2022; 83(3):227-236.

PMID: 36382533 PMC: 10099873. DOI: 10.1002/pros.24454.


Prognostic significance of pathogenic variants in BRCA1, BRCA2, ATM and PALB2 genes in men undergoing hormonal therapy for advanced prostate cancer.

Kimura H, Mizuno K, Shiota M, Narita S, Terada N, Fujimoto N Br J Cancer. 2022; 127(9):1680-1690.

PMID: 35986085 PMC: 9596487. DOI: 10.1038/s41416-022-01915-2.

References
1.
Sokolova A, Shirts B, Konnick E, Tsai G, Goulart B, Montgomery B . Complexities of Next-Generation Sequencing in Solid Tumors: Case Studies. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2020; 18(9):1150-1155. DOI: 10.6004/jnccn.2020.7569. View

2.
Hussain M, Mateo J, Fizazi K, Saad F, Shore N, Sandhu S . Survival with Olaparib in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2020; 383(24):2345-2357. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2022485. View

3.
. Prevalence and penetrance of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in a population-based series of breast cancer cases. Anglian Breast Cancer Study Group. Br J Cancer. 2000; 83(10):1301-8. PMC: 2408797. DOI: 10.1054/bjoc.2000.1407. View

4.
Carlson A, Acevedo R, Lim D, Gulati R, Gawne A, Sokolova A . Impact of mutations in homologous recombination repair genes on treatment outcomes for metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer. PLoS One. 2020; 15(9):e0239686. PMC: 7526881. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0239686. View

5.
Sokolova A, Yu E, Cheng H . Honing in on PARPi Response in Prostate Cancer: from HR Pathway to Gene-by-Gene Granularity. Clin Cancer Res. 2020; 26(11):2439-2440. PMC: 7269828. DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-20-0707. View