» Articles » PMID: 34502709

Cross-Modality Interaction Network for Equine Activity Recognition Using Imbalanced Multi-Modal Data

Overview
Journal Sensors (Basel)
Publisher MDPI
Specialty Biotechnology
Date 2021 Sep 10
PMID 34502709
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

With the recent advances in deep learning, wearable sensors have increasingly been used in automated animal activity recognition. However, there are two major challenges in improving recognition performance-multi-modal feature fusion and imbalanced data modeling. In this study, to improve classification performance for equine activities while tackling these two challenges, we developed a cross-modality interaction network (CMI-Net) involving a dual convolution neural network architecture and a cross-modality interaction module (CMIM). The CMIM adaptively recalibrated the temporal- and axis-wise features in each modality by leveraging multi-modal information to achieve deep intermodality interaction. A class-balanced (CB) focal loss was adopted to supervise the training of CMI-Net to alleviate the class imbalance problem. Motion data was acquired from six neck-attached inertial measurement units from six horses. The CMI-Net was trained and verified with leave-one-out cross-validation. The results demonstrated that our CMI-Net outperformed the existing algorithms with high precision (79.74%), recall (79.57%), F1-score (79.02%), and accuracy (93.37%). The adoption of CB focal loss improved the performance of CMI-Net, with increases of 2.76%, 4.16%, and 3.92% in precision, recall, and F1-score, respectively. In conclusion, CMI-Net and CB focal loss effectively enhanced the equine activity classification performance using imbalanced multi-modal sensor data.

Citing Articles

Validation and interdevice reliability of a behavior monitoring collar to measure rumination, feeding activity, and idle time of lactating dairy cows.

Lovatti J, Dijkinga K, Aires J, Garrido L, Costa J, Daros R JDS Commun. 2024; 5(6):602-607.

PMID: 39650024 PMC: 11624420. DOI: 10.3168/jdsc.2023-0467.


Unsupervised Domain Adaptation for Mitigating Sensor Variability and Interspecies Heterogeneity in Animal Activity Recognition.

Ahn S, Kim S, Jeong D Animals (Basel). 2023; 13(20).

PMID: 37894000 PMC: 10603736. DOI: 10.3390/ani13203276.


Machine Learning-Based Sensor Data Fusion for Animal Monitoring: Scoping Review.

Aguilar-Lazcano C, Espinosa-Curiel I, Rios-Martinez J, Madera-Ramirez F, Perez-Espinosa H Sensors (Basel). 2023; 23(12).

PMID: 37420896 PMC: 10305307. DOI: 10.3390/s23125732.


FedAAR: A Novel Federated Learning Framework for Animal Activity Recognition with Wearable Sensors.

Mao A, Huang E, Gan H, Liu K Animals (Basel). 2022; 12(16).

PMID: 36009732 PMC: 9404798. DOI: 10.3390/ani12162142.


Automated identification of chicken distress vocalizations using deep learning models.

Mao A, Giraudet C, Liu K, De Almeida Nolasco I, Xie Z, Xie Z J R Soc Interface. 2022; 19(191):20210921.

PMID: 35765806 PMC: 9240672. DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2021.0921.

References
1.
de Cocq P, van Weeren P, Back W . Effects of girth, saddle and weight on movements of the horse. Equine Vet J. 2005; 36(8):758-63. DOI: 10.2746/0425164044848000. View

2.
LeCun Y, Bengio Y, Hinton G . Deep learning. Nature. 2015; 521(7553):436-44. DOI: 10.1038/nature14539. View

3.
Khan S, Hayat M, Bennamoun M, Sohel F, Togneri R . Cost-Sensitive Learning of Deep Feature Representations From Imbalanced Data. IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst. 2017; 29(8):3573-3587. DOI: 10.1109/TNNLS.2017.2732482. View

4.
Chambers R, Yoder N, Carson A, Junge C, Allen D, Prescott L . Deep Learning Classification of Canine Behavior Using a Single Collar-Mounted Accelerometer: Real-World Validation. Animals (Basel). 2021; 11(6). PMC: 8228965. DOI: 10.3390/ani11061549. View

5.
Parkes R, Weller R, Pfau T, Witte T . The Effect of Training on Stride Duration in a Cohort of Two-Year-Old and Three-Year-Old Thoroughbred Racehorses. Animals (Basel). 2019; 9(7). PMC: 6680649. DOI: 10.3390/ani9070466. View