» Articles » PMID: 34491999

Altering Product Placement to Create a Healthier Layout in Supermarkets: Outcomes on Store Sales, Customer Purchasing, and Diet in a Prospective Matched Controlled Cluster Study

Overview
Journal PLoS Med
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2021 Sep 7
PMID 34491999
Citations 16
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Previous product placement trials in supermarkets are limited in scope and outcome data collected. This study assessed the effects on store-level sales, household-level purchasing, and dietary behaviours of a healthier supermarket layout.

Methods And Findings: This is a prospective matched controlled cluster trial with 2 intervention components: (i) new fresh fruit and vegetable sections near store entrances (replacing smaller displays at the back) and frozen vegetables repositioned to the entrance aisle, plus (ii) the removal of confectionery from checkouts and aisle ends opposite. In this pilot study, the intervention was implemented for 6 months in 3 discount supermarkets in England. Three control stores were matched on store sales and customer profiles and neighbourhood deprivation. Women customers aged 18 to 45 years, with loyalty cards, were assigned to the intervention (n = 62) or control group (n = 88) of their primary store. The trial registration number is NCT03518151. Interrupted time series analysis showed that increases in store-level sales of fruits and vegetables were greater in intervention stores than predicted at 3 (1.71 standard deviations (SDs) (95% CI 0.45, 2.96), P = 0.01) and 6 months follow-up (2.42 SDs (0.22, 4.62), P = 0.03), equivalent to approximately 6,170 and approximately 9,820 extra portions per store, per week, respectively. The proportion of purchasing fruits and vegetables per week rose among intervention participants at 3 and 6 months compared to control participants (0.2% versus -3.0%, P = 0.22; 1.7% versus -3.5%, P = 0.05, respectively). Store sales of confectionery were lower in intervention stores than predicted at 3 (-1.05 SDs (-1.98, -0.12), P = 0.03) and 6 months (-1.37 SDs (-2.95, 0.22), P = 0.09), equivalent to approximately 1,359 and approximately 1,575 fewer portions per store, per week, respectively; no differences were observed for confectionery purchasing. Changes in dietary variables were predominantly in the expected direction for health benefit. Intervention implementation was not within control of the research team, and stores could not be randomised. It is a pilot study, and, therefore, not powered to detect an effect.

Conclusions: Healthier supermarket layouts can improve the nutrition profile of store sales and likely improve household purchasing and dietary quality. Placing fruits and vegetables near store entrances should be considered alongside policies to limit prominent placement of unhealthy foods.

Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03518151 (pre-results).

Citing Articles

The Influence of Healthy Lifestyle on Willingness to Consume Healthy Food Brands: A Perceived Value Perspective.

Garcia-Salirrosas E, Esponda-Perez J, Millones-Liza D, Haro-Zea K, Moreno-Barrera L, Ezcurra-Zavaleta G Foods. 2025; 14(2).

PMID: 39856880 PMC: 11764545. DOI: 10.3390/foods14020213.


Temporal distribution of schedule-induced behavior depends on the essential value of the reinforcer.

Martinez-Herrada A, Pellon R, Lopez-Tolsa G J Exp Anal Behav. 2025; 123(1):10-29.

PMID: 39760436 PMC: 11757002. DOI: 10.1002/jeab.4235.


Can nudge interventions targeting healthy food purchases in real-world grocery stores reduce diet-related health disparities? A pooled analysis of four controlled trials.

Stuber J, Beulens J, Ayala G, Crozier S, Dijkstra S, Lin S Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2024; 21(1):137.

PMID: 39627771 PMC: 11616344. DOI: 10.1186/s12966-024-01687-3.


Implementation of a UK supermarket intervention to increase purchasing of fresh fruit and vegetables: process evaluation of the WRAPPED natural experiment.

Baird J, Dhuria P, Payne H, Crozier S, Lawrence W, Vogel C Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2024; 21(1):128.

PMID: 39529139 PMC: 11552182. DOI: 10.1186/s12966-024-01679-3.


What does it take for healthy food retail programmes to be successful? Lessons learned in New York City.

Setiono F, Heller S, Leak T Public Health Nutr. 2024; 27(1):e188.

PMID: 39360456 PMC: 11505404. DOI: 10.1017/S1368980024001368.


References
1.
Vogel C, Ntani G, Inskip H, Barker M, Cummins S, Cooper C . Education and the Relationship Between Supermarket Environment and Diet. Am J Prev Med. 2016; 51(2):e27-e34. PMC: 4959574. DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2016.02.030. View

2.
Thorndike A, Bright O, Dimond M, Fishman R, Levy D . Choice architecture to promote fruit and vegetable purchases by families participating in the Special Supplemental Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC): randomized corner store pilot study. Public Health Nutr. 2016; 20(7):1297-1305. PMC: 5407909. DOI: 10.1017/S1368980016003074. View

3.
Albert S, Langellier B, Sharif M, Chan-Golston A, Prelip M, Garcia R . A corner store intervention to improve access to fruits and vegetables in two Latino communities. Public Health Nutr. 2017; 20(12):2249-2259. PMC: 5561521. DOI: 10.1017/S1368980017001008. View

4.
Pechey R, Monsivais P . Supermarket Choice, Shopping Behavior, Socioeconomic Status, and Food Purchases. Am J Prev Med. 2015; 49(6):868-77. PMC: 4651322. DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2015.04.020. View

5.
Winkler L, Christensen U, Glumer C, Bloch P, Mikkelsen B, Wansink B . Substituting sugar confectionery with fruit and healthy snacks at checkout - a win-win strategy for consumers and food stores? a study on consumer attitudes and sales effects of a healthy supermarket intervention. BMC Public Health. 2016; 16(1):1184. PMC: 5120526. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-016-3849-4. View