» Articles » PMID: 34490198

Lessons Learned From COVID-19 Contact Tracing During a Public Health Emergency: A Prospective Implementation Study

Overview
Specialty Public Health
Date 2021 Sep 7
PMID 34490198
Citations 18
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Contact tracing is a core element of the public health response to emerging infectious diseases including COVID-19. Better understanding the implementation context of contact tracing for pandemics, including individual- and systems-level predictors of success, is critical to preparing for future epidemics. We carried out a prospective implementation study of an emergency volunteer contact tracing program established in New Haven, Connecticut between April 4 and May 19, 2020. We assessed the yield and timeliness of case and contact outreach in reference to CDC benchmarks, and identified individual and programmatic predictors of successful implementation using multivariable regression models. We synthesized our findings using the RE-AIM implementation framework. Case investigators interviewed only 826 (48%) of 1,705 cases and were unable to reach 545 (32%) because of incomplete information and 334 (20%) who missed or declined repeated outreach calls. Contact notifiers reached just 687 (28%) of 2,437 reported contacts, and were unable to reach 1,597 (66%) with incomplete information and 153 (6%) who missed or declined repeated outreach calls. The median time-to-case-interview was 5 days and time-to-contact-notification 8 days. However, among notified contacts with complete time data, 457 (71%) were reached within 6 days of exposure. The least likely groups to be interviewed were elderly (adjusted relative risk, aRR 0.74, 95% CI 0.61-0.89, = 0.012, vs. young adult) and Black/African-American cases (aRR 0.88, 95% CI 0.80-0.97, pairwise = 0.01, vs. Hispanic/Latinx). However, ties between cases and their contacts strongly influenced contact notification success (Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) 0.60). Surging caseloads and high volunteer turnover (case investigator = 144, median time from sign-up to retirement from program was 4 weeks) required the program to supplement the volunteer workforce with paid public health nurses. An emergency volunteer-run contact tracing program fell short of CDC benchmarks for time and yield, largely due to difficulty collecting the information required for outreach to cases and contacts. To improve uptake, contact tracing programs must professionalize the workforce; better integrate testing and tracing services; capitalize on positive social influences between cases and contacts; and address racial and age-related disparities through enhanced community engagement.

Citing Articles

A Retrospective Analysis of Jordan's National COVID-19 Call Center: Operations, Effectiveness, and Lessons Learned.

Alrawashdeh A, Simmons N, Alhawarat M, Maayeh M, Kheirallah K J Multidiscip Healthc. 2024; 17:5079-5089.

PMID: 39534874 PMC: 11556226. DOI: 10.2147/JMDH.S475335.


Development of a University-Government Partnership for Public Health Response and Workforce Development in the State of Oregon.

Hall E, Sarwary S, Reynolds A, Przedworski J, Newby-Kew A, Camp K J Community Health. 2024; 49(5):779-784.

PMID: 38491319 DOI: 10.1007/s10900-024-01352-7.


Looking under the lamp-post: quantifying the performance of contact tracing in the United States during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic.

Bayly H, Stoddard M, Van Egeren D, Murray E, Raifman J, Chakravarty A BMC Public Health. 2024; 24(1):595.

PMID: 38395830 PMC: 10893709. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-024-18012-z.


Evaluation of the implementation of a community health worker-led COVID-19 contact tracing intervention in Chiapas, Mexico, from March 2020 to December 2021.

Aranda Z, Vazquez S, Gopaluni A, Martinez L, Ramirez M, Jimenez A BMC Health Serv Res. 2024; 24(1):97.

PMID: 38233915 PMC: 10795220. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-024-10590-3.


Evaluating the impact on health outcomes of an event that resulted in a delay in contact tracing of COVID-19 cases in England, September 2020: an observational study.

Findlater L, Pierotti L, Turner C, Wensley A, Chen C, Seaman S BMJ Open. 2023; 13(10):e064982.

PMID: 37827740 PMC: 10583033. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-064982.


References
1.
Lim P . Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS) in Asia: lessons gleaned from the South Korean outbreak. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2015; 109(9):541-2. PMC: 7107261. DOI: 10.1093/trstmh/trv064. View

2.
Malheiro R, Figueiredo A, Magalhaes J, P Teixeira , Moita I, Moutinho M . Effectiveness of contact tracing and quarantine on reducing COVID-19 transmission: a retrospective cohort study. Public Health. 2020; 189:54-59. PMC: 7522642. DOI: 10.1016/j.puhe.2020.09.012. View

3.
Jian S, Cheng H, Huang X, Liu D . Contact tracing with digital assistance in Taiwan's COVID-19 outbreak response. Int J Infect Dis. 2020; 101:348-352. PMC: 7537669. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijid.2020.09.1483. View

4.
Kahabuka C, Plotkin M, Christensen A, Brown C, Njozi M, Kisendi R . Addressing the First 90: A Highly Effective Partner Notification Approach Reaches Previously Undiagnosed Sexual Partners in Tanzania. AIDS Behav. 2017; 21(8):2551-2560. PMC: 5533821. DOI: 10.1007/s10461-017-1750-5. View

5.
Ferretti L, Wymant C, Kendall M, Zhao L, Nurtay A, Abeler-Dorner L . Quantifying SARS-CoV-2 transmission suggests epidemic control with digital contact tracing. Science. 2020; 368(6491). PMC: 7164555. DOI: 10.1126/science.abb6936. View