» Articles » PMID: 32970654

COVID-19 Contact Tracing in Two Counties - North Carolina, June-July 2020

Abstract

Contact tracing is a strategy implemented to minimize the spread of communicable diseases (1,2). Prompt contact tracing, testing, and self-quarantine can reduce the transmission of SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) (3,4). Community engagement is important to encourage participation in and cooperation with SARS-CoV-2 contact tracing (5). Substantial investments have been made to scale up contact tracing for COVID-19 in the United States. During June 1-July 12, 2020, the incidence of COVID-19 cases in North Carolina increased 183%, from seven to 19 per 100,000 persons per day* (6). To assess local COVID-19 contact tracing implementation, data from two counties in North Carolina were analyzed during a period of high incidence. Health department staff members investigated 5,514 (77%) persons with COVID-19 in Mecklenburg County and 584 (99%) in Randolph Counties. No contacts were reported for 48% of cases in Mecklenburg and for 35% in Randolph. Among contacts provided, 25% in Mecklenburg and 48% in Randolph could not be reached by telephone and were classified as nonresponsive after at least one attempt on 3 consecutive days of failed attempts. The median interval from specimen collection from the index patient to notification of identified contacts was 6 days in both counties. Despite aggressive efforts by health department staff members to perform case investigations and contact tracing, many persons with COVID-19 did not report contacts, and many contacts were not reached. These findings indicate that improved timeliness of contact tracing, community engagement, and increased use of community-wide mitigation are needed to interrupt SARS-CoV-2 transmission.

Citing Articles

Roles of mobile teams in tracing lost to follow-up clients: evidence from the optimization of COVID-19 vaccination uptake and routine immunization in Ekiti State.

Isiaka S, Awobeku D, Jimoh A, Dauda M, Samuel O, Asaolu S BMC Health Serv Res. 2025; 25(1):151.

PMID: 39871324 PMC: 11771021. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-025-12319-2.


A Retrospective Analysis of Jordan's National COVID-19 Call Center: Operations, Effectiveness, and Lessons Learned.

Alrawashdeh A, Simmons N, Alhawarat M, Maayeh M, Kheirallah K J Multidiscip Healthc. 2024; 17:5079-5089.

PMID: 39534874 PMC: 11556226. DOI: 10.2147/JMDH.S475335.


Evaluation of the New York City COVID-19 case investigation and contact tracing program: a cascade of care analysis.

Conderino S, Thorpe L, Shilpi Islam N, Berry C, Bendik S, Massar R BMC Public Health. 2024; 24(1):2356.

PMID: 39210385 PMC: 11363647. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-024-19838-3.


Representativeness of a national, probability-based panel survey of COVID-19 isolation practices-United States, 2020-2022.

Matulewicz H, Vohra D, Crawford-Crudell W, Oeltmann J, Moonan P, Taylor M Front Epidemiol. 2024; 4:1379256.

PMID: 38737986 PMC: 11082340. DOI: 10.3389/fepid.2024.1379256.


Looking under the lamp-post: quantifying the performance of contact tracing in the United States during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic.

Bayly H, Stoddard M, Van Egeren D, Murray E, Raifman J, Chakravarty A BMC Public Health. 2024; 24(1):595.

PMID: 38395830 PMC: 10893709. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-024-18012-z.


References
1.
Bell B, Damon I, Jernigan D, Kenyon T, Nichol S, OConnor J . Overview, Control Strategies, and Lessons Learned in the CDC Response to the 2014-2016 Ebola Epidemic. MMWR Suppl. 2016; 65(3):4-11. DOI: 10.15585/mmwr.su6503a2. View

2.
Kretzschmar M, Rozhnova G, Bootsma M, van Boven M, van de Wijgert J, Bonten M . Impact of delays on effectiveness of contact tracing strategies for COVID-19: a modelling study. Lancet Public Health. 2020; 5(8):e452-e459. PMC: 7365652. DOI: 10.1016/S2468-2667(20)30157-2. View

3.
Altman D . Understanding the US failure on coronavirus-an essay by Drew Altman. BMJ. 2020; 370:m3417. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.m3417. View

4.
Rothenberg R, McElroy P, Wilce M, Muth S . Contact tracing: comparing the approaches for sexually transmitted diseases and tuberculosis. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2003; 7(12 Suppl 3):S342-8. View

5.
Reichler M, Reves R, Bur S, Thompson V, Mangura B, Ford J . Evaluation of investigations conducted to detect and prevent transmission of tuberculosis. JAMA. 2002; 287(8):991-5. DOI: 10.1001/jama.287.8.991. View