» Articles » PMID: 34478464

Changes in Maternal Risk Factors and Their Association with Changes in Cesarean Sections in Norway Between 1999 and 2016: A Descriptive Population-based Registry Study

Overview
Journal PLoS Med
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2021 Sep 3
PMID 34478464
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Increases in the proportion of the population with increased likelihood of cesarean section (CS) have been postulated as a driving force behind the rise in CS rates worldwide. The aim of the study was to assess if changes in selected maternal risk factors for CS are associated with changes in CS births from 1999 to 2016 in Norway.

Methods And Findings: This national population-based registry study utilizes data from 1,055,006 births registered in the Norwegian Medical Birth Registry from 1999 to 2016. The following maternal risk factors for CS were included: nulliparous/≥35 years, multiparous/≥35 years, pregestational diabetes, gestational diabetes, hypertensive disorders, previous CS, assisted reproductive technology, and multiple births. The proportion of CS births in 1999 was used to predict the number of CS births in 2016. The observed and predicted numbers of CS births were compared to determine the number of excess CS births, before and after considering the selected risk factors, for all births, and for births stratified by 0, 1, or >1 of the selected risk factors. The proportion of CS births increased from 12.9% to 16.1% (+24.8%) during the study period. The proportion of births with 1 selected risk factor increased from 21.3% to 26.3% (+23.5%), while the proportion with >1 risk factor increased from 4.5% to 8.8% (+95.6%). Stratification by the presence of selected risk factors reduced the number of excess CS births observed in 2016 compared to 1999 by 67.9%. Study limitations include lack of access to other important maternal risk factors and only comparing the first and the last year of the study period.

Conclusions: In this study, we observed that after an initial increase, proportions of CS births remained stable from 2005 to 2016. Instead, both the size of the risk population and the mean number of risk factors per birth continued to increase. We observed a possible association between the increase in size of risk population and the additional CS births observed in 2016 compared to 1999. The increase in size of risk population and the stable CS rate from 2005 and onward may indicate consistent adherence to obstetric evidence-based practice in Norway.

Citing Articles

Caesarean section and operative vaginal delivery in Estonia and Finland from 1992 to 2016: registry-based study.

Sildver K, Veerus P, Gissler M, Lang K, Pisarev H Eur J Public Health. 2024; 34(6):1205-1209.

PMID: 39435857 PMC: 11631386. DOI: 10.1093/eurpub/ckae162.


Birthweight trends and their explanatory factors in Hungary between 1999 and 2018: an analysis of the Hungarian Tauffer registry.

Zsirai L, Kun A, Visolyi G, Svebis M, Domjan B, Tabak A Reprod Health. 2024; 21(1):52.

PMID: 38609984 PMC: 11015640. DOI: 10.1186/s12978-024-01787-0.


Caesarean section in women with axial spondyloarthritis and psoriatic arthritis: a population-based study.

Skorpen C, Lydersen S, Salvesen K, Koksvik H, Jakobsen B, Wallenius M RMD Open. 2023; 9(1).

PMID: 36863750 PMC: 9990672. DOI: 10.1136/rmdopen-2022-002760.


Quality of health care around the time of childbirth during the COVID-19 pandemic: Results from the IMAgiNE EURO study in Norway and trends over time.

Nedberg I, Vik E, Kongslien S, Mariani I, Valente E, Covi B Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2022; 159 Suppl 1:85-96.

PMID: 36530008 PMC: 9877678. DOI: 10.1002/ijgo.14460.

References
1.
Boerma T, Ronsmans C, Melesse D, Barros A, Barros F, Juan L . Global epidemiology of use of and disparities in caesarean sections. Lancet. 2018; 392(10155):1341-1348. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31928-7. View

2.
Backe B, Heggestad T, Lie T . [The epidemic of Caesarean section: has it reached Norway?]. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2003; 123(11):1522-4. View

3.
Eide K, Morken N, Baeroe K . Maternal reasons for requesting planned cesarean section in Norway: a qualitative study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019; 19(1):102. PMC: 6440101. DOI: 10.1186/s12884-019-2250-6. View

4.
Healy S, Humphreys E, Kennedy C . Midwives' and obstetricians' perceptions of risk and its impact on clinical practice and decision-making in labour: An integrative review. Women Birth. 2015; 29(2):107-16. DOI: 10.1016/j.wombi.2015.08.010. View

5.
Grobman W, Rice M, Reddy U, Tita A, Silver R, Mallett G . Labor Induction versus Expectant Management in Low-Risk Nulliparous Women. N Engl J Med. 2018; 379(6):513-523. PMC: 6186292. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1800566. View